9.9 GHz processor paired with 4GB RAM delivers the same frame rate as the 3070 model.
9.9 GHz processor paired with 4GB RAM delivers the same frame rate as the 3070 model.
I recently acquired an ASUS OC edition 4070ti and noticed my FPS remains consistent with the 3070 in COD MW2. I play at ultra settings on 1440p using an i9 9900k with 32GB RAM, ASUS Z390E, Kraken AIO, and a Corsair 1k watt PS.
MW2 offers a solid benchmarking utility. I can execute it on both GPUs and provide the output you receive. Expect a chart similar to the one shown.
Unless you're capping your frame rate, it's likely a CPU issue. This issue is often overlooked because most CPU benchmarks use a set of 12 games that demonstrate solid improvements in performance. MMOs and titles with large player bases tend to be CPU-bound, even at 144fps—something I experienced firsthand after switching from a 3950x to a 5800x3D.
Honestly, unlikely (the cpu comment) like yes the CPU might be binding at points, but not enough to get exact same FPS. Notice what I posted is a run with the 9700k rendering the game at 2224x1248 resolution (less then 1440p of OP) and there is NO cpu bind.
I share the same view as @Agall—it’ll be a full CPU bottleneck, which explains why my 10900k struggles in MW2 too.
Hey, the game is running at 1024x576, not even HD. But your CPU seems way too slow for the situation. The scores should match what I shared earlier, so you're facing two issues at once.
The interface keeps updating, but the settings show 100% rendering. I’ll verify and recheck to understand what’s happening.