F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking 6600k Safe Overclock?

6600k Safe Overclock?

6600k Safe Overclock?

K
Killa_Dx
Senior Member
645
09-03-2016, 12:49 PM
#1
I have a 6600k cooled by a Cryorig H7 on an Asus Z170 AR.
I'm achieving a stable 4.7 Ghz when I set the vcore to 1.375, but Hardware Monitor shows the vcore as 1.392 (my BIOS vcore is adaptive with "+").
I ran x264 (from overclock.net) overnight:
At idle it's in the mid 35 range, at load it's mid to high 70s, reaching a peak of 82.
Is this a safe daily overclock?
K
Killa_Dx
09-03-2016, 12:49 PM #1

I have a 6600k cooled by a Cryorig H7 on an Asus Z170 AR.
I'm achieving a stable 4.7 Ghz when I set the vcore to 1.375, but Hardware Monitor shows the vcore as 1.392 (my BIOS vcore is adaptive with "+").
I ran x264 (from overclock.net) overnight:
At idle it's in the mid 35 range, at load it's mid to high 70s, reaching a peak of 82.
Is this a safe daily overclock?

B
Back2Blaze
Member
204
09-15-2016, 04:06 PM
#2
If your core temperatures are between 70-80, it's acceptable.
The adaptive voltage suggests your BIOS might configure higher settings than you intended.
That's why we manually adjust the value during benchmarking and stress tests, aiming for a stable overclock. Since gaming or other tasks demand significantly less power than benchmarks, this approach works well.
B
Back2Blaze
09-15-2016, 04:06 PM #2

If your core temperatures are between 70-80, it's acceptable.
The adaptive voltage suggests your BIOS might configure higher settings than you intended.
That's why we manually adjust the value during benchmarking and stress tests, aiming for a stable overclock. Since gaming or other tasks demand significantly less power than benchmarks, this approach works well.

E
Ensk__Mafia
Junior Member
39
09-15-2016, 05:19 PM
#3
If your core temperatures are between 70-80, it's acceptable.
The adaptive voltage indicates your MB might be configured higher than your settings.
That's why we manually adjust the value during benchmarking and stress tests, aiming for a stable overclock. Since gaming or other tasks demand less power than benchmarks, we switch to adaptive mode.
E
Ensk__Mafia
09-15-2016, 05:19 PM #3

If your core temperatures are between 70-80, it's acceptable.
The adaptive voltage indicates your MB might be configured higher than your settings.
That's why we manually adjust the value during benchmarking and stress tests, aiming for a stable overclock. Since gaming or other tasks demand less power than benchmarks, we switch to adaptive mode.

C
Carsland123
Senior Member
398
09-20-2016, 02:12 AM
#4
If your core temperatures are between 70-80, it's acceptable. The adaptive voltage means your MB might set higher than you intended. That's why we manually set the value during benchmarking and stress tests, find a stable overclock, and switch to adaptive since gaming or similar tasks use significantly less power than benchmarks. After establishing a stable manual vcore, you should change it to adaptive instead of plus.
C
Carsland123
09-20-2016, 02:12 AM #4

If your core temperatures are between 70-80, it's acceptable. The adaptive voltage means your MB might set higher than you intended. That's why we manually set the value during benchmarking and stress tests, find a stable overclock, and switch to adaptive since gaming or similar tasks use significantly less power than benchmarks. After establishing a stable manual vcore, you should change it to adaptive instead of plus.

T
TheDarkTiger74
Junior Member
43
09-20-2016, 03:41 AM
#5
I have no idea what are those + - options. I'm familiar with "adaptive".
Since you already gave the overclock and your temperatures are fine, just leave it as is for now
T
TheDarkTiger74
09-20-2016, 03:41 AM #5

I have no idea what are those + - options. I'm familiar with "adaptive".
Since you already gave the overclock and your temperatures are fine, just leave it as is for now

H
144
10-01-2016, 08:20 AM
#6
I took the safer path and simply lowered back to 4.6 Ghz with a vcore of 1.30.
Temperatures stay below 70, so the jump from 4.7 Ghz at 1.39 seems reasonable for an initial overclock.
H
Hearth_PvP_God
10-01-2016, 08:20 AM #6

I took the safer path and simply lowered back to 4.6 Ghz with a vcore of 1.30.
Temperatures stay below 70, so the jump from 4.7 Ghz at 1.39 seems reasonable for an initial overclock.

L
lerconl
Member
58
10-01-2016, 08:44 AM
#7
Absolutely, the difference in performance is minimal.
L
lerconl
10-01-2016, 08:44 AM #7

Absolutely, the difference in performance is minimal.