F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop 3300x, 3500 or 3600?

3300x, 3500 or 3600?

3300x, 3500 or 3600?

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
S
Spaceface16518
Senior Member
564
08-22-2019, 09:32 PM
#11
My device is a Dell Inspiron 5570 with dual-core Intel HD 620 graphics. Previously, I played D2 at 30 fps with 720p resolution. With a GTX 470, performance should roughly double, allowing up to 60 frames in a game that runs smoothly even with higher settings. Intel is advancing quickly, and future chips could rival today's Pentium in power. Newer titles like Red Dead Redemption 2 will likely require more demanding hardware, such as a GTX 770.
S
Spaceface16518
08-22-2019, 09:32 PM #11

My device is a Dell Inspiron 5570 with dual-core Intel HD 620 graphics. Previously, I played D2 at 30 fps with 720p resolution. With a GTX 470, performance should roughly double, allowing up to 60 frames in a game that runs smoothly even with higher settings. Intel is advancing quickly, and future chips could rival today's Pentium in power. Newer titles like Red Dead Redemption 2 will likely require more demanding hardware, such as a GTX 770.

A
AGamersHero
Member
65
08-24-2019, 01:59 AM
#12
the original specifications are no longer accurate. i had to upgrade to 32gb ram since cod was consuming up to 13.5gb while gaming, leaving little space for other tasks when you only had 16gb.
A
AGamersHero
08-24-2019, 01:59 AM #12

the original specifications are no longer accurate. i had to upgrade to 32gb ram since cod was consuming up to 13.5gb while gaming, leaving little space for other tasks when you only had 16gb.

L
Lykeson
Member
53
08-24-2019, 06:14 AM
#13
It appears you're questioning the point of extra RAM in a game where you're mainly focused on playing. That makes sense—unless you're optimizing for performance or specific features.
L
Lykeson
08-24-2019, 06:14 AM #13

It appears you're questioning the point of extra RAM in a game where you're mainly focused on playing. That makes sense—unless you're optimizing for performance or specific features.

L
levo14
Member
247
08-28-2019, 02:39 PM
#14
I've experienced similar struggles before. My system was an AMD Athlon II from 2019 with just integrated graphics and 2 GB RAM. I played COD MW1, MW2, and other titles at 800x600 resolution and 20 FPS or lower. Playing games now at those settings feels fine, but unless the CPU is powerful enough to handle it after a few years, I’d go for the 3300X because of my budget constraints. What do you think? Do you mean something else by "out of date"?
L
levo14
08-28-2019, 02:39 PM #14

I've experienced similar struggles before. My system was an AMD Athlon II from 2019 with just integrated graphics and 2 GB RAM. I played COD MW1, MW2, and other titles at 800x600 resolution and 20 FPS or lower. Playing games now at those settings feels fine, but unless the CPU is powerful enough to handle it after a few years, I’d go for the 3300X because of my budget constraints. What do you think? Do you mean something else by "out of date"?

Y
Yoshman2000
Member
180
08-28-2019, 11:39 PM
#15
The issue lies in comparing the 3600-hour window to a 3300-hour one, especially with limited funds—opt for a 3300-hour plan instead.
Y
Yoshman2000
08-28-2019, 11:39 PM #15

The issue lies in comparing the 3600-hour window to a 3300-hour one, especially with limited funds—opt for a 3300-hour plan instead.

S
Sweefiz
Junior Member
13
09-03-2019, 08:19 AM
#16
Sure thing! Thanks a lot!
S
Sweefiz
09-03-2019, 08:19 AM #16

Sure thing! Thanks a lot!

K
Kqsmotic
Member
63
09-03-2019, 08:26 AM
#17
Consider the 3300X for gaming if you're playing, as it offers performance close to or better than a 3600 with simpler overclocking. For tasks like streaming or video editing, opt for the 3600. Also, clarify which design software you plan to use—some applications handle more threads well than others.
K
Kqsmotic
09-03-2019, 08:26 AM #17

Consider the 3300X for gaming if you're playing, as it offers performance close to or better than a 3600 with simpler overclocking. For tasks like streaming or video editing, opt for the 3600. Also, clarify which design software you plan to use—some applications handle more threads well than others.

_
_zLuckasPvP
Junior Member
5
09-13-2019, 12:34 AM
#18
the minimum requirements are set to cover basic needs right away. when games are released with larger updates, the specifications often shift. at first, my ram usage was about 6gb, but after upgrading to 13.5gb and applying the latest patches, i now use a 13.5gb system while still running the same specs. the game performance has improved significantly, allowing me to upgrade from an asrock b450 pro 4 to an asrock x570 phantom gaming 4 without any issues.
_
_zLuckasPvP
09-13-2019, 12:34 AM #18

the minimum requirements are set to cover basic needs right away. when games are released with larger updates, the specifications often shift. at first, my ram usage was about 6gb, but after upgrading to 13.5gb and applying the latest patches, i now use a 13.5gb system while still running the same specs. the game performance has improved significantly, allowing me to upgrade from an asrock b450 pro 4 to an asrock x570 phantom gaming 4 without any issues.

S
superphilly123
Junior Member
23
09-13-2019, 08:24 PM
#19
photoshop and I’m interested in diving into video editing, especially for sports clips and memes, though the main focus is on gaming builds.
S
superphilly123
09-13-2019, 08:24 PM #19

photoshop and I’m interested in diving into video editing, especially for sports clips and memes, though the main focus is on gaming builds.

K
KARLEISHAK
Member
197
09-15-2019, 07:57 AM
#20
Yes, that increase in RAM use is often caused by inefficient setup or outdated software. I intended to limit the system to 16 gigabytes, but I won’t be streaming at all.
K
KARLEISHAK
09-15-2019, 07:57 AM #20

Yes, that increase in RAM use is often caused by inefficient setup or outdated software. I intended to limit the system to 16 gigabytes, but I won’t be streaming at all.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next