Zen 4 vs 4c
Zen 4 vs 4c
Reviewing the content, I understand the main points being discussed. The article suggests that the overall architecture remains consistent from a software standpoint. It mentions potential size reductions due to smaller L3 per core and tighter packing elsewhere, though total L3 remains similar. A possible drawback is that denser layouts might affect clock speeds. The piece also compares AMD cores to Intel's design, noting differences in cache handling and thermal management. It raises questions about whether performance gains come mainly from layout efficiency or from other factors like power density. I’m not familiar with specific rumors yet, but I’m following the trends outlined here.
From what I understand, the key issue isn't the socket itself. They could likely install whatever they want on it, as long as the design supports it. The main reason for the change seems to be power delivery. The important part is the IO die, so as long as the connection can function, they might achieve what you suggest. They’d probably need a minor redesign. I believe the only chance this would happen is if Intel actually poses a threat in multi-threaded scenarios. They’d also have to develop proper workload scheduling similar to Intel’s approach. Right now, they seem satisfied with their current product. Overall revenue from PCs is declining, so keeping costs low is a priority. It seems AMD sticking with their existing design is the most probable path. I’m not aware of any major rumors yet, but next-gen chips could be quite similar. A 32-core Zen 5 chip sounds promising—definitely worth hoping they develop it. If it works smoothly, we’ll likely see it soon.