F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Zen 3 RAM OC is stuck after the first day. Planning to attempt again.

Zen 3 RAM OC is stuck after the first day. Planning to attempt again.

Zen 3 RAM OC is stuck after the first day. Planning to attempt again.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
M
MirzaMRJ
Junior Member
4
08-22-2022, 12:25 PM
#11
I'm focusing on creating a profile that's sustainable over time rather than relying on short-term spikes. The TFAW formula could be useful here, along with adjusting command rates and BGAs. Also, note that 4400C22 and 3200C16 share the same initial latency.
M
MirzaMRJ
08-22-2022, 12:25 PM #11

I'm focusing on creating a profile that's sustainable over time rather than relying on short-term spikes. The TFAW formula could be useful here, along with adjusting command rates and BGAs. Also, note that 4400C22 and 3200C16 share the same initial latency.

K
KlayDog1
Senior Member
685
08-23-2022, 08:25 AM
#12
Latency shlatency is often disappointing, and theory doesn’t always match real-world results. You need to examine actual performance data through proper testing, rather than relying solely on concepts. Using theory to control everything leads to pitfalls like PSU tierlists and overpriced builds that offer little real advantage over cheaper options. The 3600c18 performs better than the 3200c16 in this regard. A 1.5V supply is a perfectly reasonable daily voltage; if you’re overly cautious, there’s no point investing time. Focus on achieving meaningful improvements instead of chasing marginal gains for trivial benefits. My approach skips arbitrary safety thresholds and prioritizes performance goals, ensuring I invest effort where it matters most. This means I don’t waste hours chasing small increases when a 1% gain versus a 7% gain is better because I reduced my voltage to 1.65V rather than 2V on DDR3 or lowered it to 1.5V compared to 1.7V on DDR4. Tighten the TRDRs and set everything to 1, then go. No need for extra stability tweaks or time-consuming adjustments—just set it and forget it. Five minutes can yield around a 3% improvement, which makes total sense. Time isn’t wasted if you’re not rushing through it. Only when you waste effort like a clumsy knee does I disagree. I’ve never seen significant RAM degradation; sticking to 2.4V+ is safe for now, or lower voltages (even 2.2V) will still hold up for a while. Just test some reliable chips like CJ-R or similar, and you’ll see what works.
K
KlayDog1
08-23-2022, 08:25 AM #12

Latency shlatency is often disappointing, and theory doesn’t always match real-world results. You need to examine actual performance data through proper testing, rather than relying solely on concepts. Using theory to control everything leads to pitfalls like PSU tierlists and overpriced builds that offer little real advantage over cheaper options. The 3600c18 performs better than the 3200c16 in this regard. A 1.5V supply is a perfectly reasonable daily voltage; if you’re overly cautious, there’s no point investing time. Focus on achieving meaningful improvements instead of chasing marginal gains for trivial benefits. My approach skips arbitrary safety thresholds and prioritizes performance goals, ensuring I invest effort where it matters most. This means I don’t waste hours chasing small increases when a 1% gain versus a 7% gain is better because I reduced my voltage to 1.65V rather than 2V on DDR3 or lowered it to 1.5V compared to 1.7V on DDR4. Tighten the TRDRs and set everything to 1, then go. No need for extra stability tweaks or time-consuming adjustments—just set it and forget it. Five minutes can yield around a 3% improvement, which makes total sense. Time isn’t wasted if you’re not rushing through it. Only when you waste effort like a clumsy knee does I disagree. I’ve never seen significant RAM degradation; sticking to 2.4V+ is safe for now, or lower voltages (even 2.2V) will still hold up for a while. Just test some reliable chips like CJ-R or similar, and you’ll see what works.

J
JonoGaimz
Member
63
09-07-2022, 06:13 PM
#13
I’d prefer focusing on performance targets, but I also value personal objectives and the time spent troubleshooting my computer. Balancing reliability with growth in gaming, writing, and tech is important. It’s easy to lean too far in one direction if you’re not careful. Thanks for the guidance!
J
JonoGaimz
09-07-2022, 06:13 PM #13

I’d prefer focusing on performance targets, but I also value personal objectives and the time spent troubleshooting my computer. Balancing reliability with growth in gaming, writing, and tech is important. It’s easy to lean too far in one direction if you’re not careful. Thanks for the guidance!

W
WomboDzn
Member
130
09-09-2022, 02:48 AM
#14
Use the 5-minute routine from @WereCat. It offers solid results without major drawbacks. Save effort if you're not committed to doing it well or going into detail.
W
WomboDzn
09-09-2022, 02:48 AM #14

Use the 5-minute routine from @WereCat. It offers solid results without major drawbacks. Save effort if you're not committed to doing it well or going into detail.

J
JDM23
Junior Member
17
09-09-2022, 09:53 AM
#15
You're just swamped right now. Perhaps one day I'll tackle a similar challenge.
J
JDM23
09-09-2022, 09:53 AM #15

You're just swamped right now. Perhaps one day I'll tackle a similar challenge.

D
Dam1yo
Member
145
09-15-2022, 03:31 AM
#16
Even though my idea of a glory run matches what you call a daily OC, it’s mainly because I’m an obsessed OC fan. Most people who share this interest only do it alongside me or others who think the same. If you want a bit more speed, tightening the TRFC might help—though I’m not sure if it works with higher voltages on the chip. It should be straightforward since it’s just one timing test.
D
Dam1yo
09-15-2022, 03:31 AM #16

Even though my idea of a glory run matches what you call a daily OC, it’s mainly because I’m an obsessed OC fan. Most people who share this interest only do it alongside me or others who think the same. If you want a bit more speed, tightening the TRFC might help—though I’m not sure if it works with higher voltages on the chip. It should be straightforward since it’s just one timing test.

A
AlexZBeast
Member
119
09-16-2022, 07:30 AM
#17
Update from @WereCat – everything ran super smoothly! .1 climbed high and I’m consistently landing at 120 on 1% lows. It’s making high SBMM in Fortnite much easier to track. Thanks a ton!
A
AlexZBeast
09-16-2022, 07:30 AM #17

Update from @WereCat – everything ran super smoothly! .1 climbed high and I’m consistently landing at 120 on 1% lows. It’s making high SBMM in Fortnite much easier to track. Thanks a ton!

V
VIPfighter
Member
62
09-16-2022, 04:03 PM
#18
That's great! You're welcome.
V
VIPfighter
09-16-2022, 04:03 PM #18

That's great! You're welcome.

D
228
09-19-2022, 01:58 PM
#19
I attempted to upgrade Teamgroup RAM using the same specifications as 3200 CL16 20-20-40-60. Successfully ran 3600 CL18 at 1.4V, but encountered issues during the AIDA64 memory stability test and occasionally with OCCT. After several attempts—including trying 3400—I found that running everything at 3200CL16 was the only stable option. SorryClaire, I recommend testing those two programs to check for errors. My assessment was that Teamgroup 3200CL16 isn’t reliable for OC. I ended up purchasing a 3600 RAM module and installing it in another system.
D
Danieltowersxd
09-19-2022, 01:58 PM #19

I attempted to upgrade Teamgroup RAM using the same specifications as 3200 CL16 20-20-40-60. Successfully ran 3600 CL18 at 1.4V, but encountered issues during the AIDA64 memory stability test and occasionally with OCCT. After several attempts—including trying 3400—I found that running everything at 3200CL16 was the only stable option. SorryClaire, I recommend testing those two programs to check for errors. My assessment was that Teamgroup 3200CL16 isn’t reliable for OC. I ended up purchasing a 3600 RAM module and installing it in another system.

K
Krydino
Member
54
09-19-2022, 09:41 PM
#20
B ist überall im Gleichgewicht.
K
Krydino
09-19-2022, 09:41 PM #20

B ist überall im Gleichgewicht.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next