F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming You're still having trouble playing Crysis 1.

You're still having trouble playing Crysis 1.

You're still having trouble playing Crysis 1.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
W
Weetigo
Junior Member
3
06-28-2016, 09:01 PM
#11
It seems there might be an issue with the game version. I recall playing it on a quad775 and an MSI GTX260 with maximum settings.
W
Weetigo
06-28-2016, 09:01 PM #11

It seems there might be an issue with the game version. I recall playing it on a quad775 and an MSI GTX260 with maximum settings.

I
IronHammer12
Member
50
06-28-2016, 09:23 PM
#12
Crysis runs poorly due to optimization issues, though it should work smoothly at 1080p on a GTX 970. Expect occasional stutters in the 30s, but overall performance varies. The game operates in windowed or fullscreen mode depending on settings.
I
IronHammer12
06-28-2016, 09:23 PM #12

Crysis runs poorly due to optimization issues, though it should work smoothly at 1080p on a GTX 970. Expect occasional stutters in the 30s, but overall performance varies. The game operates in windowed or fullscreen mode depending on settings.

D
dniznemac
Senior Member
555
07-12-2016, 06:55 AM
#13
I use fullscreen mode, and the average comes out to about 47 frames per second. It mostly stays around 60fps when not in intense action or gameplay, except on empty desert paths where it drops to 27. It doesn’t spike during explosions—just seems like the system can’t keep up.
D
dniznemac
07-12-2016, 06:55 AM #13

I use fullscreen mode, and the average comes out to about 47 frames per second. It mostly stays around 60fps when not in intense action or gameplay, except on empty desert paths where it drops to 27. It doesn’t spike during explosions—just seems like the system can’t keep up.

S
Seby777
Member
58
07-12-2016, 03:15 PM
#14
The problem mainly occurs in the first half, especially after reaching the Snowy level area, and it performs well at 60fps.
S
Seby777
07-12-2016, 03:15 PM #14

The problem mainly occurs in the first half, especially after reaching the Snowy level area, and it performs well at 60fps.

X
xDandy
Junior Member
13
07-12-2016, 04:42 PM
#15
Crysis 1 runs poorly on my Xeon E3-1231v3. It forces one core to full capacity, another to half, while the remaining threads struggle. I often experience dips in the high 40s during the second mission. The GPU isn’t the main issue—it’s the CPU that’s causing the problem.
X
xDandy
07-12-2016, 04:42 PM #15

Crysis 1 runs poorly on my Xeon E3-1231v3. It forces one core to full capacity, another to half, while the remaining threads struggle. I often experience dips in the high 40s during the second mission. The GPU isn’t the main issue—it’s the CPU that’s causing the problem.

B
bear7001
Senior Member
448
07-21-2016, 05:10 PM
#16
So to clarify things here, Crysis 1 isn’t extremely optimized. The game is ten years old and was really fine with just one core, then improved for dual cores. You shouldn’t assume they’d keep improving it when more cores become available. That’s just not realistic, but it reflects EA’s approach. The game even advertises great performance on the Intel Extreme edition for single cores. In fact, it performs better on an AMD FX single core CPU than on the older Intel Extreme edition. That’s just how outdated this title is! Now I’ve actually played it on both an FX 8350 and my current I7 5960x. It didn’t run smoothly on the 8350, though I don’t remember it stalling for long. However, it did run well on the 2,7970s in Xfire—maybe that helped. I’m sure my 5960x boosted my FPS by about double. So the 8350 isn’t the ideal CPU for Crysis 1. But it was still playable, especially since I recorded the whole game with Frap. The video looks smooth and doesn’t show any stuttering. I also find it odd you mention playing in fullscreen while the screenshot is windowed. Are you taking a fullscreen capture, or are you referring to playing in windowed mode? For old games like Crysis 1, playing windowed usually makes them run worse, at least according to my experience. I just wanted to share some extra details in case they’re useful.
B
bear7001
07-21-2016, 05:10 PM #16

So to clarify things here, Crysis 1 isn’t extremely optimized. The game is ten years old and was really fine with just one core, then improved for dual cores. You shouldn’t assume they’d keep improving it when more cores become available. That’s just not realistic, but it reflects EA’s approach. The game even advertises great performance on the Intel Extreme edition for single cores. In fact, it performs better on an AMD FX single core CPU than on the older Intel Extreme edition. That’s just how outdated this title is! Now I’ve actually played it on both an FX 8350 and my current I7 5960x. It didn’t run smoothly on the 8350, though I don’t remember it stalling for long. However, it did run well on the 2,7970s in Xfire—maybe that helped. I’m sure my 5960x boosted my FPS by about double. So the 8350 isn’t the ideal CPU for Crysis 1. But it was still playable, especially since I recorded the whole game with Frap. The video looks smooth and doesn’t show any stuttering. I also find it odd you mention playing in fullscreen while the screenshot is windowed. Are you taking a fullscreen capture, or are you referring to playing in windowed mode? For old games like Crysis 1, playing windowed usually makes them run worse, at least according to my experience. I just wanted to share some extra details in case they’re useful.

R
Ricardo_
Junior Member
43
07-22-2016, 10:32 AM
#17
You're referring to the belief that Intel released a single-core Extreme Edition processor in 2007, specifically the Core 2 Quad QX line. The game you mention is indeed outdated, but it doesn't involve the Pentium 4 era.
R
Ricardo_
07-22-2016, 10:32 AM #17

You're referring to the belief that Intel released a single-core Extreme Edition processor in 2007, specifically the Core 2 Quad QX line. The game you mention is indeed outdated, but it doesn't involve the Pentium 4 era.

M
MrLegal
Member
170
07-22-2016, 10:38 AM
#18
Taking a screenshot in fullscreen shows a black screen, yet the frame rate remains consistent and it behaves identically whether it's windowed or fullscreen.
M
MrLegal
07-22-2016, 10:38 AM #18

Taking a screenshot in fullscreen shows a black screen, yet the frame rate remains consistent and it behaves identically whether it's windowed or fullscreen.

B
Bluebird16
Junior Member
28
07-29-2016, 03:53 PM
#19
Apologies, we were mistaken—actually it's the Core 2 Extreme. This is the dual-core Extreme version, not the quad-core. The quad-core model was released later (Q1 2008). This game wasn't designed for more than a dual-core processor. The graphics card I recall thinking performed better with the AMD FX chip at that time.
B
Bluebird16
07-29-2016, 03:53 PM #19

Apologies, we were mistaken—actually it's the Core 2 Extreme. This is the dual-core Extreme version, not the quad-core. The quad-core model was released later (Q1 2008). This game wasn't designed for more than a dual-core processor. The graphics card I recall thinking performed better with the AMD FX chip at that time.

K
KablooieKablam
Posting Freak
908
08-15-2016, 08:14 PM
#20
You're still mistaken. There were Core 2 Quad Extreme editions since 2006 for the Q6XXX series.
K
KablooieKablam
08-15-2016, 08:14 PM #20

You're still mistaken. There were Core 2 Quad Extreme editions since 2006 for the Q6XXX series.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next