F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Your machine can handle shaders in Minecraft 1.17, yet it only achieves 100 frames per second.

Your machine can handle shaders in Minecraft 1.17, yet it only achieves 100 frames per second.

Your machine can handle shaders in Minecraft 1.17, yet it only achieves 100 frames per second.

A
Auztn
Member
Find
163
02-09-2020, 10:05 PM
#1
Has anyone encountered this problem before? It seems to be a one-off issue with version 1.17 for me. Even on the standard build, my system can't maintain a stable 144fps. Back in 1.16.5 it ran smoothly at about 1200fps, but now it's lagging. The game isn't making the most of my hardware. When I enable Sildur's Vibrant Shaders at high settings, the GPU usage hits 45%, CPU is only 7%, and RAM usage jumps to 8GB of the 32GB available. I'm using 10GB out of the total. Frames vary from 100 to 120, and I really want a consistent 144fps at 1080p. What's happening? I've never seen a game underperform this way—it looks like it's not utilizing my computer effectively. Full specs: Core i9-10900K, 32GB DDR4-3600, GeForce GTX 980 Ti, ASRock B460M, Steel Legend.
Reply
Reply
A
Auztn
02-09-2020, 10:05 PM #1

Has anyone encountered this problem before? It seems to be a one-off issue with version 1.17 for me. Even on the standard build, my system can't maintain a stable 144fps. Back in 1.16.5 it ran smoothly at about 1200fps, but now it's lagging. The game isn't making the most of my hardware. When I enable Sildur's Vibrant Shaders at high settings, the GPU usage hits 45%, CPU is only 7%, and RAM usage jumps to 8GB of the 32GB available. I'm using 10GB out of the total. Frames vary from 100 to 120, and I really want a consistent 144fps at 1080p. What's happening? I've never seen a game underperform this way—it looks like it's not utilizing my computer effectively. Full specs: Core i9-10900K, 32GB DDR4-3600, GeForce GTX 980 Ti, ASRock B460M, Steel Legend.

Reply
Reply
V
Vungard
Junior Member
Find
13
02-10-2020, 01:34 AM
#2
The game's issue is probably the cause, not your device. Did you look up any additional details about the updated main character version in FPS?
Reply
Reply
V
Vungard
02-10-2020, 01:34 AM #2

The game's issue is probably the cause, not your device. Did you look up any additional details about the updated main character version in FPS?

Reply
Reply
K
Kynedee
Posting Freak
Find
784
02-10-2020, 08:28 AM
#3
Switching back to 1.16 typically restores the original settings, so it should return to 1200 FPS. However, if you're seeing a different frame rate, it might be stuck at 120 on all versions due to other configurations.
Reply
Reply
K
Kynedee
02-10-2020, 08:28 AM #3

Switching back to 1.16 typically restores the original settings, so it should return to 1200 FPS. However, if you're seeing a different frame rate, it might be stuck at 120 on all versions due to other configurations.

Reply
Reply
A
azagale
Junior Member
Find
38
02-16-2020, 10:52 AM
#4
With shaders enabled, performance is about 230fps; without them it drops to around 1,600 frames per second.
Reply
Reply
A
azagale
02-16-2020, 10:52 AM #4

With shaders enabled, performance is about 230fps; without them it drops to around 1,600 frames per second.

Reply
Reply
X
xoArtz
Member
Find
112
02-16-2020, 12:59 PM
#5
In version 1.17 the Java version was updated from 8 to JDK 16. This might be leading to problems. The launcher should let you choose Java 8.
Reply
Reply
X
xoArtz
02-16-2020, 12:59 PM #5

In version 1.17 the Java version was updated from 8 to JDK 16. This might be leading to problems. The launcher should let you choose Java 8.

Reply
Reply
A
AA_Esser
Member
Find
181
02-16-2020, 10:19 PM
#6
You can choose the Java version settings directly within the launcher interface, not just through the "Settings" menu.
Reply
Reply
A
AA_Esser
02-16-2020, 10:19 PM #6

You can choose the Java version settings directly within the launcher interface, not just through the "Settings" menu.

Reply
Reply