You'd need to pay a significant amount each month to gain access to a wide variety of games.
You'd need to pay a significant amount each month to gain access to a wide variety of games.
HeroBrin0123
10-13-2016, 06:43 AM #1We want to know how much people are ready to spend on high-quality games without extra charges such as internet plans or recurring fees. Your feedback is valuable—thank you!
IkBenHetBram
10-22-2016, 07:23 PM #4It seems the triple A matches were the reason for your silence or lack of gameplay.
MissNerdyGirl
10-24-2016, 06:55 PM #7Torrenting remains popular, though a service like this would be expensive—over $100 because of licensing fees. Many individuals don’t play multiple games; they usually buy one or two and enjoy them slowly until finished. These are people who have moved past their teenage or childhood years and simply don’t have time to waste on gaming.
I see you're thinking about alternative ways to access games. Instead of streaming or paying per title, having a monthly subscription could let you play a few select games at once. Would that encourage you to explore more options and enjoy a broader selection?
) If I decide to play, I’d prefer to own the game myself. The cheapest option is $50. During Steam sales, I could purchase 6–10 games over three months. There aren’t enough titles I truly want to enjoy to justify the service. Also, my friend has a large collection on Steam and wouldn’t use such a platform.
I support the idea of having an alternative for those who aren’t interested in signing up. (But I don’t agree with the notion that older people lack time for gaming ) If I decide to play, I’d prefer to own the game myself. The cheapest option is $50. During Steam sales, I could purchase 6–10 games over three months. There aren’t enough titles I truly want to enjoy to justify the service. Also, my friend has a large collection on Steam and wouldn’t use such a platform.