You need guidance.
You need guidance.
I purchased the TP-Link AX50 aftermarket router with ISP A. After switching to ISP B, I got a 2-in-1 modem & router, giving me two routers and four Wi-Fi networks (each with 2.4GHz and 5GHz bands). Both routers are placed close together, so I’m concerned about interference. I’m considering moving the AX50 to a central area between two rooms that don’t receive signal from the living room. My question is: should I adjust the placement of my networking gear? The modem/router is a Huawei HG8145V5, and the aftermarket model is the TP-Link AX50. Should I disable Wi-Fi on the modem/router or keep it active but separate the devices to avoid conflicts?
I have a comparable configuration to handle the lower and upper levels, using a FIOS 2in1 followed by a Netgear nighthawk upstairs. They’re connected with a 75 ft CAT6 cable in a Langley house style, and all the upper area powers from the nighthawk while the lower area connects directly to it. It works perfectly.
It sounds like you're considering a comparable installation, but only half the apartment has coverage. You'll need to determine the cable length required and locate the best spot for the router. For guidance on calculating cable needs, you might look into typical distances and signal strength requirements.
I would calculate the distance first and then include an extra 15-20% for cable organization. I allocated roughly 70 feet of the 75-foot length going up the wall, with several turns. It's wiser to have a bit more than what you need. The price change between the 50 and 75-foot sizes was approximately $5, so I recommend choosing the larger size if it will be near. Another advantage is that the device automatically assigned a static IP to the nighthawk and set itself as an access point.
The router's setup guide for configuring it as an access point is clear. Regarding QOS, it prioritizes selected devices, which could affect performance if you're the only one using that router.
In reality, unless you're overwhelming the link with numerous minor details and dealing with limited bandwidth and slow transfer rates, the impact won't be significant. For me, the primary motivation was ensuring stable connectivity and strong signal strength. My home has thick plaster and metal lath, which weakens Wi-Fi performance. I typically experience under 10 ms latency wirelessly and around 7 ms wired. Regarding QoS concerns, I usually distribute the number of connected devices evenly and balance the load. I tend to allocate the 2.4ghz channel for non-latency-sensitive or low-priority devices, reserving the 5ghz band for latency-sensitive tasks and higher priority connections. In short: I find ping duration more noticeable than enabling QoS settings.