You can achieve more advanced tasks or higher performance settings with a Ryzen 7 2700 compared to a Ryzen 5 3600.
You can achieve more advanced tasks or higher performance settings with a Ryzen 7 2700 compared to a Ryzen 5 3600.
Photoshop remains the primary tool, making the R5 3600 a better choice because most of its features run on a single-core architecture.
I don't understand why people think current CPUs can't do something, like photo or video. That's simply not the case at all. It just takes longer. And, really, since he's not doing it in any great capacity, I wouldn't worry about it. Go with the 3600. It'll game better, and that's what he's doing the most.
video editing benefits from 8 cores, even if the basic Adobe suite uses fewer. If budget allows, the 3600 works well for those with limited resources. Consider the R7 4700 next year—it will surpass both mentioned CPUs. Invest in a solid motherboard that supports it later, and look for the most affordable option now. Avoid Intel; rumors suggest I9 10 cores with 20 threads will appear soon, making current Intel chips nearly outdated. They’ll regain competitiveness with Ryzen in terms of core count and threads, not price. Intel is usually very costly.
Yeah, I wasn't really saying it wouldn't be possible at all, I was basically saying at which point it's better to take a R7 2700 but yeah I understand you didn't get it. Also, he just showed me his current build and I think every CPU will beat his, he currently has a Pentium so yeah I don't think he'll get picky about it lmao