F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Yes, your PC can run Battlefield 4 if it meets the system requirements.

Yes, your PC can run Battlefield 4 if it meets the system requirements.

Yes, your PC can run Battlefield 4 if it meets the system requirements.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
L
lizzard89
Senior Member
707
06-11-2016, 02:06 AM
#11
Consider switching to a GTX 960 soon, if you're interested.
L
lizzard89
06-11-2016, 02:06 AM #11

Consider switching to a GTX 960 soon, if you're interested.

S
Shankit
Junior Member
49
06-11-2016, 03:17 AM
#12
Consider an R9 280X or similar model instead of the GTX 960.
S
Shankit
06-11-2016, 03:17 AM #12

Consider an R9 280X or similar model instead of the GTX 960.

F
FramezTheBest
Member
222
07-02-2016, 10:18 AM
#13
Well, that depends on what you mean by "OK settings." Could you clarify?
F
FramezTheBest
07-02-2016, 10:18 AM #13

Well, that depends on what you mean by "OK settings." Could you clarify?

P
PewTie
Member
74
07-04-2016, 03:34 AM
#14
AMD receives a lot more attention than NVIDIA gets; they deliver a 280X performance compared to a 960, particularly excelling on battlefield.
P
PewTie
07-04-2016, 03:34 AM #14

AMD receives a lot more attention than NVIDIA gets; they deliver a 280X performance compared to a 960, particularly excelling on battlefield.

B
bxrfa
Junior Member
9
07-24-2016, 09:29 PM
#15
Settings at 1080p with 60fps average on a 280x resolution are quite good.
B
bxrfa
07-24-2016, 09:29 PM #15

Settings at 1080p with 60fps average on a 280x resolution are quite good.

R
RepoRizer
Posting Freak
872
07-29-2016, 12:46 AM
#16
He has a low WEI score, but that doesn’t capture the real issue. WEI is just a weak computer rating method. Also, his storage capacity seems very poor—likely just an HDD.
R
RepoRizer
07-29-2016, 12:46 AM #16

He has a low WEI score, but that doesn’t capture the real issue. WEI is just a weak computer rating method. Also, his storage capacity seems very poor—likely just an HDD.

D
DatBoii
Member
144
07-29-2016, 01:59 PM
#17
If that can't play it at all I would be really surprised considering iGPU can run it at 1080p low stable 30-36 FPS. Yea, get a 280/x, they work great in BF4. I bought my brother a Sapphire 280, runs BF4 Ultra @ 60 FPS on 1080p. Amazing card! 280 280x
D
DatBoii
07-29-2016, 01:59 PM #17

If that can't play it at all I would be really surprised considering iGPU can run it at 1080p low stable 30-36 FPS. Yea, get a 280/x, they work great in BF4. I bought my brother a Sapphire 280, runs BF4 Ultra @ 60 FPS on 1080p. Amazing card! 280 280x

P
PascaMouse
Member
105
08-04-2016, 03:44 PM
#18
Check the listings, search for a Raydon 7950, it’s a R9 280, or a 7970 GHz version—it’s a 280X. You might get them for around $100 used.
P
PascaMouse
08-04-2016, 03:44 PM #18

Check the listings, search for a Raydon 7950, it’s a R9 280, or a 7970 GHz version—it’s a 280X. You might get them for around $100 used.

F
Fumii_
Member
58
08-04-2016, 08:51 PM
#19
For reference, my GTX 960 handles BF4 well at high to ultra settings. On high without anti-aliasing I maintain over 80 FPS, while ultra keeps me around 50+ FPS. In Battlefield 4, it's best to keep most settings low for a competitive advantage—like minimizing landscape details and hiding spots. As a shooter, the terrain should serve strategy, not aesthetics.

Additionally, even The Witcher 3 looks fine on my GTX 960, though some developers claim it’s not feasible to run the game smoothly. The listed minimum specs seem more about showcasing developer pride than actual performance.
F
Fumii_
08-04-2016, 08:51 PM #19

For reference, my GTX 960 handles BF4 well at high to ultra settings. On high without anti-aliasing I maintain over 80 FPS, while ultra keeps me around 50+ FPS. In Battlefield 4, it's best to keep most settings low for a competitive advantage—like minimizing landscape details and hiding spots. As a shooter, the terrain should serve strategy, not aesthetics.

Additionally, even The Witcher 3 looks fine on my GTX 960, though some developers claim it’s not feasible to run the game smoothly. The listed minimum specs seem more about showcasing developer pride than actual performance.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2