F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Yes, there are video players available for Ubuntu.

Yes, there are video players available for Ubuntu.

Yes, there are video players available for Ubuntu.

B
Bigking
Member
154
05-09-2016, 12:59 PM
#1
VLC isn't running smoothly on your system. Are there other reliable apps available for Linux?
B
Bigking
05-09-2016, 12:59 PM #1

VLC isn't running smoothly on your system. Are there other reliable apps available for Linux?

O
ozmonster12
Member
75
05-09-2016, 07:48 PM
#2
SMPlayer is also commonly used. Even if VLC feels slow, the issue might be elsewhere.
O
ozmonster12
05-09-2016, 07:48 PM #2

SMPlayer is also commonly used. Even if VLC feels slow, the issue might be elsewhere.

B
bigjpw
Junior Member
3
05-09-2016, 09:09 PM
#3
If VLC isn't working smoothly, it likely affects other applications too. You might be referring to its slow performance. You could try alternatives like mpc-qt or smplayer. For more options, see the List of Common Linux Video Players here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Lis...raphical_4
B
bigjpw
05-09-2016, 09:09 PM #3

If VLC isn't working smoothly, it likely affects other applications too. You might be referring to its slow performance. You could try alternatives like mpc-qt or smplayer. For more options, see the List of Common Linux Video Players here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Lis...raphical_4

B
Bayan9
Member
158
05-10-2016, 12:24 AM
#4
This seems like a hardware issue. Please share your specifications. You can test with mpv or mplayer.
B
Bayan9
05-10-2016, 12:24 AM #4

This seems like a hardware issue. Please share your specifications. You can test with mpv or mplayer.

M
Msweez560
Junior Member
2
05-10-2016, 07:19 AM
#5
Video plays well in VLC, yet the program runs slower on Windows.
M
Msweez560
05-10-2016, 07:19 AM #5

Video plays well in VLC, yet the program runs slower on Windows.

L
102
05-12-2016, 01:42 AM
#6
Celluloid serves as an effective, lightweight video player.
L
lookatmyskill2
05-12-2016, 01:42 AM #6

Celluloid serves as an effective, lightweight video player.

T
TdmFan92
Senior Member
602
05-16-2016, 10:20 PM
#7
When I'm not using a browser, I rely on mpv. I prefer a command-line experience and don’t need any graphical interface except for the OSD feature in mpv. I assume SMplayer, which already has some suggestions, should match mpv’s speed and responsiveness. While VLC is widely available in free software video players, my opinion is that mpv performs better overall. It handles almost any format, though VLC might be slightly faster in some situations—especially if you encounter optical media. I’m not sure why VLC feels sluggish in your case; I’ve noticed it can be quite snappy when I try it recently. In fact, it sometimes pauses briefly while searching for optical files, but that’s usually only when you navigate those menus. Since I haven’t used Windows in nearly twenty years, I can’t compare performance directly, but I suspect it runs noticeably faster than VLC.
T
TdmFan92
05-16-2016, 10:20 PM #7

When I'm not using a browser, I rely on mpv. I prefer a command-line experience and don’t need any graphical interface except for the OSD feature in mpv. I assume SMplayer, which already has some suggestions, should match mpv’s speed and responsiveness. While VLC is widely available in free software video players, my opinion is that mpv performs better overall. It handles almost any format, though VLC might be slightly faster in some situations—especially if you encounter optical media. I’m not sure why VLC feels sluggish in your case; I’ve noticed it can be quite snappy when I try it recently. In fact, it sometimes pauses briefly while searching for optical files, but that’s usually only when you navigate those menus. Since I haven’t used Windows in nearly twenty years, I can’t compare performance directly, but I suspect it runs noticeably faster than VLC.