F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Yes, the CPU can influence FPS even when the GPU is fully utilized.

Yes, the CPU can influence FPS even when the GPU is fully utilized.

Yes, the CPU can influence FPS even when the GPU is fully utilized.

N
nanobot55
Junior Member
3
03-19-2022, 11:28 AM
#1
If you used the 3060 at full capacity on both processors, the i9-13900k would likely provide higher FPS due to its superior performance.
N
nanobot55
03-19-2022, 11:28 AM #1

If you used the 3060 at full capacity on both processors, the i9-13900k would likely provide higher FPS due to its superior performance.

A
applepielow
Junior Member
7
03-21-2022, 02:50 AM
#2
It's likely yes, though it may not be practical or obvious when the GPU is heavily used.
A
applepielow
03-21-2022, 02:50 AM #2

It's likely yes, though it may not be practical or obvious when the GPU is heavily used.

X
Xx_R3TARD3R_xX
Junior Member
10
03-21-2022, 05:09 AM
#3
You may notice a minor adjustment, but if the GPU is fixed, it will likely be the main factor affecting your speed.
X
Xx_R3TARD3R_xX
03-21-2022, 05:09 AM #3

You may notice a minor adjustment, but if the GPU is fixed, it will likely be the main factor affecting your speed.

L
Lorys
Junior Member
5
03-22-2022, 10:18 AM
#4
I was just curious since I thought it might be useful, but it seems like a minor adjustment considering the cost.
L
Lorys
03-22-2022, 10:18 AM #4

I was just curious since I thought it might be useful, but it seems like a minor adjustment considering the cost.

L
LauRaGeDu60
Member
61
03-24-2022, 01:48 AM
#5
I experienced a minimal impact on GPU-intensive titles after upgrading from an i5 9600K to an R9 5900X while retaining the RTX 2060 Super. In gaming scenarios that rely heavily on graphics, the performance gap was almost imperceptible—I didn’t notice any difference when playing Control on both systems, and benchmarks confirmed no significant variation in that title. For CPU-constrained games, things changed—games like PUBG and Fortnite ran smoother with the 5900X, though I still lowered settings to avoid GPU bottlenecks as much as possible.
L
LauRaGeDu60
03-24-2022, 01:48 AM #5

I experienced a minimal impact on GPU-intensive titles after upgrading from an i5 9600K to an R9 5900X while retaining the RTX 2060 Super. In gaming scenarios that rely heavily on graphics, the performance gap was almost imperceptible—I didn’t notice any difference when playing Control on both systems, and benchmarks confirmed no significant variation in that title. For CPU-constrained games, things changed—games like PUBG and Fortnite ran smoother with the 5900X, though I still lowered settings to avoid GPU bottlenecks as much as possible.

T
63
03-28-2022, 01:20 AM
#6
It could actually increase performance beyond expectations since the GPU sometimes struggles to handle the workload even when it's operating at full capacity. Of course, this varies based on the specific game.
T
TheSparklyDuck
03-28-2022, 01:20 AM #6

It could actually increase performance beyond expectations since the GPU sometimes struggles to handle the workload even when it's operating at full capacity. Of course, this varies based on the specific game.

E
epsilondu26
Junior Member
26
03-28-2022, 02:46 AM
#7
It largely depends on the game and the specific situation within it. Consider WoW as an illustration; even with high-end hardware like a 7800x3D/13900k, performance can still be severely affected by CPU limitations in crowded areas. The difference from older CPUs can often be two times the minimum or average frame rate. Eventually, network constraints become noticeable because servers must quickly send player positions to your system, restricting how much your CPU can draw frames and render them.

To grasp this better, playing Warframe provides clearer insight, though it remains somewhat simplified. Warframe falls into the MMO category with diverse settings—single-player and multiplayer environments varying in player and NPC numbers. Over the past decade, I’ve tested a wide range of systems while closely monitoring frame rates.

One notable case shows that both a 4790k and a 7950x3D could hit 500 fps at 4K ultra resolution. This highlights a GPU bottleneck situation. What makes it more intriguing is that the 4790k achieved 500 fps at 1080p ultra, while the 7950x3D reached 1200 fps in the same setup. Clearly, at 1080p, an overclocked RTX 4090 can surpass 500 fps, but the 4790k couldn’t go beyond that threshold.

Interestingly, this suggests that even with an overclocked GPU, certain configurations hit a ceiling of 500 fps. If you don’t engage in these demanding games and stick to single-player experiences without network interaction or server communication, upgrading your CPU probably won’t yield noticeable gains. Instead, consider investing in a new graphics card for better performance.
E
epsilondu26
03-28-2022, 02:46 AM #7

It largely depends on the game and the specific situation within it. Consider WoW as an illustration; even with high-end hardware like a 7800x3D/13900k, performance can still be severely affected by CPU limitations in crowded areas. The difference from older CPUs can often be two times the minimum or average frame rate. Eventually, network constraints become noticeable because servers must quickly send player positions to your system, restricting how much your CPU can draw frames and render them.

To grasp this better, playing Warframe provides clearer insight, though it remains somewhat simplified. Warframe falls into the MMO category with diverse settings—single-player and multiplayer environments varying in player and NPC numbers. Over the past decade, I’ve tested a wide range of systems while closely monitoring frame rates.

One notable case shows that both a 4790k and a 7950x3D could hit 500 fps at 4K ultra resolution. This highlights a GPU bottleneck situation. What makes it more intriguing is that the 4790k achieved 500 fps at 1080p ultra, while the 7950x3D reached 1200 fps in the same setup. Clearly, at 1080p, an overclocked RTX 4090 can surpass 500 fps, but the 4790k couldn’t go beyond that threshold.

Interestingly, this suggests that even with an overclocked GPU, certain configurations hit a ceiling of 500 fps. If you don’t engage in these demanding games and stick to single-player experiences without network interaction or server communication, upgrading your CPU probably won’t yield noticeable gains. Instead, consider investing in a new graphics card for better performance.

F
F3M4
Junior Member
10
04-03-2022, 07:51 PM
#8
Yes but not always. Sometimes, full utilization doesn’t reflect real performance gains. For instance, if a task runs continuously with no idle time, but the system has unused resources like cache or memory, the numbers might not tell the whole story. Ideally, the GPU should finish a frame and immediately start the next without delay, while the CPU handles each job smoothly. However, issues like extra driver load on the CPU (especially with Ampere and Lovelace) can distort these metrics. In short, unless you have specific data, it’s better to test the software directly rather than relying on percentages.
F
F3M4
04-03-2022, 07:51 PM #8

Yes but not always. Sometimes, full utilization doesn’t reflect real performance gains. For instance, if a task runs continuously with no idle time, but the system has unused resources like cache or memory, the numbers might not tell the whole story. Ideally, the GPU should finish a frame and immediately start the next without delay, while the CPU handles each job smoothly. However, issues like extra driver load on the CPU (especially with Ampere and Lovelace) can distort these metrics. In short, unless you have specific data, it’s better to test the software directly rather than relying on percentages.

M
MyNameIsNoOne
Member
109
04-03-2022, 09:00 PM
#9
It varies based on the setup, game, and situation, so it really can differ. Strong examples include CPU-intensive titles—such as online MMOs like WoW—where players gather in busy areas with high graphics demands. Even with a powerful GPU, the CPU might become the bottleneck, particularly during intense combat. Those low frame rates often stem from CPU limitations.
M
MyNameIsNoOne
04-03-2022, 09:00 PM #9

It varies based on the setup, game, and situation, so it really can differ. Strong examples include CPU-intensive titles—such as online MMOs like WoW—where players gather in busy areas with high graphics demands. Even with a powerful GPU, the CPU might become the bottleneck, particularly during intense combat. Those low frame rates often stem from CPU limitations.

S
Sjittham
Member
62
04-03-2022, 09:29 PM
#10
Yes, but it doesn't matter much. The impact varies depending on which component is being limited. A GPU isn't just for 3D rendering; it involves multiple stages, and using Vulkan can slightly improve performance through thread count and speed, though the gains are usually small. The CPU part remains the bottleneck. Games like DX9 or older titles with limited threads won't benefit much, while newer titles may see minor improvements. Upgrading the CPU is rarely worth it compared to boosting the GPU.
S
Sjittham
04-03-2022, 09:29 PM #10

Yes, but it doesn't matter much. The impact varies depending on which component is being limited. A GPU isn't just for 3D rendering; it involves multiple stages, and using Vulkan can slightly improve performance through thread count and speed, though the gains are usually small. The CPU part remains the bottleneck. Games like DX9 or older titles with limited threads won't benefit much, while newer titles may see minor improvements. Upgrading the CPU is rarely worth it compared to boosting the GPU.