Yes, it is feasible to construct your own internet infrastructure.
Yes, it is feasible to construct your own internet infrastructure.
I don't feel confident about it, particularly since the security concerns are significant and the routing would be extremely complex.
This means we're eliminating ISPs entirely and instead having a team of individuals handle the network setup, install connections, manage caching, and oversee routing and interconnections on a paid basis.
The mesh technology will manage all the issues, and the network will be wireless. You'll still have access to high-speed routes, which are the ISP connections we currently offer because they're best suited for this service. These won't be required by law—meaning if you can't afford it, it won't cost you. Most likely, you'll subscribe to a service like Netflix, and they'll cover the fast lanes or guide you to nearby caches or mirrors for quicker access. There will also be bigger mesh nodes with high-speed links, reducing travel distance. In short, technically it's still the internet, but ISPs won't look like they used to. Essentially, right now you must pay for any internet connection unless you choose otherwise.
I tried to keep the meaning but changed the wording. It sounds like you're saying the current internet service provider structure won't work anymore.
I completely grasp your point—yet such a situation remains unlikely as long as capitalism continues to shape society. There’s essentially no basis for the situation you’re describing. ISPs (and backbone providers) offer more than just basic connectivity; they deliver essential services and technical support. Maintaining infrastructure demands financial investment, while ongoing support requires time and skilled personnel. Repairs involve parts and expertise. While localized cooperative models might emerge—like a building managing its own network or a homeowners’ association using fixed wireless—they usually integrate with larger networks or rely on existing ISPs. A major shift in global economics would be necessary for this to become widespread.
The only thing you should remember is that beyond the rx/TX antennas, there’s minimal infrastructure needed. This keeps costs low. You’re correct about capitalism prevailing. Someone will provide a piece of hardware with free access, marking the start of a shift from wired, controlled networks to wireless, organic systems.
When issues begin to arise—like missetups, faulty components, or mismatched communication rules—individuals quickly understand the problem isn’t resolved. Surely the maker can offer help, but then they become more like an internet service provider.
The issue is clear though—mesh networking could work for simple internet use, but it won’t deliver strong speeds. Wireless connections are usually outcompeted by bandwidth limits versus fiber, and who will cover the costs of sending data back to the main networks? I believe soon we’ll stop relying on cloud hosting because our local broadband can handle everything on its own; most people won’t want that. Datacenters will remain, but how do you connect to them?
I've mentioned before that those links to high-speed lanes and data centers will come from the services you purchase. If you're an ISP and a large portion of your customers suddenly leave, where will you get the funds to replace them? It seems when you subscribe to Netflix, you automatically receive fast lane access. By now, most likely your home connection is free or at least paid for, but controlled—your Netflix subscription acting as the key. If that doesn't work, it's possible someone could earn money through a cache server or an uplink node in your network. Mesh networking is extremely fast, just like regular Wi-Fi, but its main issues are latency and routing. The bigger the mesh, the less impact these problems have, and routing has improved significantly over the past few years.