Yes, if Linux embraced every game and software available.
Yes, if Linux embraced every game and software available.
Finding OS at a lower cost with faster updates? Avoiding payments that feel exploitative? Right now, Microsoft Word works best on Windows, while most alternatives are nearly native Linux tools. Programs like GIMP, VLC, Firefox, Opera, and QGIS are available for free.
I rely on Arch Linux for professional use—it really performs well. If it could handle all the software and games Windows offers, I’d switch completely. The problem with Windows is that it often feels confusing; it doesn’t inspire deep interest in understanding computers or how they function. Most of the time it works, but when it fails, it’s frustrating. I believe people should at least grasp some basics, since computers are a significant part of daily life. Knowing how your machine operates and what it can do helps you use it more effectively and efficiently. That’s why I really appreciate ArchLinux. KISS. P.S. Macs work too, but wait for Apple to show real expertise before buying one—they’re getting into a tough spot right now.
It seems the new CEO of Microsoft faces additional responsibilities to achieve their vision of transforming Windows into a preferred platform.
If Linux could run everything I rely on, I’d change my mind immediately. Right now, it doesn’t.
Linux supports most games, though setup can be slow. 1. Linux handles all my programs. 2. Games don’t perform well on Linux. I recently tried Ubuntu Studio and SteamOS (brewmaster) about a week ago to explore an alternative. SteamOS impressed me for gaming, but I struggled to make it stick. Ubuntu Studio excelled in apps and simplicity, letting me install Steam directly and play games by downloading them. SteamOS simplified the process, though it has some issues. The main challenge is managing resources effectively. I prefer Ubuntu Studio because it works smoothly for everything, while SteamOS feels less stable for applications. My top choice would be Ubuntu Studio, as it offers a better balance of performance and usability. I’ve already used 12.2 TB on my SSD, but I’m unsure if pushing further is worth it. I might need a regular hard drive eventually and experiment with it over time. Overall, I enjoy Ubuntu Studio for its reliability, but games remain a bit of a hurdle. Once resource handling improves in Linux, I’ll consider switching permanently. Switching from Windows 10 is usually quick—getting everything optimized takes hours, and taking breaks helps avoid crashes.
My mobile or workstation already uses Linux, and roughly half of my games function natively (though most are third-party ports) while a growing number run smoothly in WINE. Recently I installed Doom 2016 and multiplay works perfectly, but single-player does not. I use Antergos, an Arch Linux distribution with a straightforward installer. If all my games ran—or at least worked in WINE—I’d switch Windows completely off my main gaming machine in a short while. For various reasons, here are some key points: 1. Windows launches, and suddenly every app wants to update itself, hogging resources and making the system slow for minutes. On Linux, just let one package manager check for updates and most apps will handle it smoothly. 2. Windows updates now come in bundles, but a recent patch broke my system too—uninstalling fixes isn’t enough because security updates also need removing. It’s frustrating on Linux. 3. And the biggest hassle: in Windows you must restart after updating, which can disrupt critical servers. I rebooted for about 20 minutes to apply all changes without interrupting operations. On Linux, I could just run a simple command or use an update interface and keep using the machine, with updates applied quietly in the background.
If Adobe CC and Serato were supported on Linux, I'd be using it all the time. I don't dislike Windows (minus the whole telemetry, data-mining, etc. with W10) but Linux is great. I've been using Fedora after Ubuntu started doing all of the social integration junk a few years back. I need to setup dual boot on my main rig, but waiting for a new m.2 drive first.
There are numerous guides available, but the top recommendation is the Lvl1Tech article from TechSyndicate. I attempted it but couldn’t achieve the necessary pass-through in my older system. Perhaps the challenge lies with integrated graphics rather than using a second card. I personally rely solely on Linux for my laptop, which I carry with me and use professionally. My PC Rig is reserved for entertainment, gaming, and some programming tasks—especially since I’m having issues with Rstudio. Outside of that, the wiki and AUR offer great support, making Arch quite capable for most needs. For me, gaming remains the primary reason I stick with Windows. My take on this? Absolutely yes, without a doubt.