F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Yes, a RAM bottleneck can affect a GPU's performance.

Yes, a RAM bottleneck can affect a GPU's performance.

Yes, a RAM bottleneck can affect a GPU's performance.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3
S
SedentarySauS
Senior Member
411
02-03-2017, 12:12 PM
#21
Dual channel setup... DDR3 1600 offers about 25.6GB/sec in dual mode, roughly doubling the rate or you can run manual tests and see around 51GB/sec. Note: I've observed similar speeds (though much higher latency) with my single 4GB DDR3 1333 stick compared to the 4GB dual channel DDR2 1066 5-6-6-18 configuration.
S
SedentarySauS
02-03-2017, 12:12 PM #21

Dual channel setup... DDR3 1600 offers about 25.6GB/sec in dual mode, roughly doubling the rate or you can run manual tests and see around 51GB/sec. Note: I've observed similar speeds (though much higher latency) with my single 4GB DDR3 1333 stick compared to the 4GB dual channel DDR2 1066 5-6-6-18 configuration.

P
perrinoid
Member
137
02-04-2017, 08:06 AM
#22
It delivers approximately 25GB/s with dual channels, while single channel provides only half of that speed.
P
perrinoid
02-04-2017, 08:06 AM #22

It delivers approximately 25GB/s with dual channels, while single channel provides only half of that speed.

M
Mikayuu_
Member
182
02-05-2017, 07:34 AM
#23
I just mentioned what I said. DDR3 1600 with dual channels delivers about 25.6GB per second, which is double the frequency (DDR3 3200-my next goal) or you can run the manual calculations (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_bandwidth) and reach around 51GB per second. Yes, DDR3 can achieve that speed as long as the IMC can support it.
M
Mikayuu_
02-05-2017, 07:34 AM #23

I just mentioned what I said. DDR3 1600 with dual channels delivers about 25.6GB per second, which is double the frequency (DDR3 3200-my next goal) or you can run the manual calculations (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_bandwidth) and reach around 51GB per second. Yes, DDR3 can achieve that speed as long as the IMC can support it.

E
Eliazz
Junior Member
36
02-05-2017, 04:31 PM
#24
However, the higher frequency signals also show increased latency. It isn't straightforward. Since I mentioned earlier, my 2400 memory performance is nowhere near 38GB/s. Please see the attached documents.
E
Eliazz
02-05-2017, 04:31 PM #24

However, the higher frequency signals also show increased latency. It isn't straightforward. Since I mentioned earlier, my 2400 memory performance is nowhere near 38GB/s. Please see the attached documents.

G
Gustavgurra03
Posting Freak
815
02-09-2017, 12:25 PM
#25
Only when you find a kit with poor timing will you see the difference. For instance, dual channel DDR2 800 4-4-4-12 performs worse than DDR2 1066 5-6-6-18 in terms of latency. You can locate low-latency options for all types of RAM. I mentioned that bandwidth is influenced by the IMC, which will be categorized differently between the CPU and North Bridge. Even if my 4790K ends up with a bad IMC (though it might actually run at 4.8GHz safely with stable voltages), the heat output could still be a problem.
G
Gustavgurra03
02-09-2017, 12:25 PM #25

Only when you find a kit with poor timing will you see the difference. For instance, dual channel DDR2 800 4-4-4-12 performs worse than DDR2 1066 5-6-6-18 in terms of latency. You can locate low-latency options for all types of RAM. I mentioned that bandwidth is influenced by the IMC, which will be categorized differently between the CPU and North Bridge. Even if my 4790K ends up with a bad IMC (though it might actually run at 4.8GHz safely with stable voltages), the heat output could still be a problem.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3