Yes, a PC handheld can run a flight simulator.
Yes, a PC handheld can run a flight simulator.
Which model offers smoother performance for Microsoft Flight Simulator X at 40fps with minimal graphics? The newer version may struggle on older handheld devices, even with limited power.
A modified 3DS might handle it smoothly at 40 frames per second.
Likely comparable setup: identical iGPU, varying CPU models, different MSFS versions. I don't actually play the game, so I'm unsure if the required specs are stricter or less. I'd suggest reducing the score further, as handheld devices tend to struggle more with heat. I'm not familiar enough with AMD's mobile CPUs, but according to the Cinebench scores—7940HS in the video appears more efficient than 8840U (found in the Zotac zone) https://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-Ryzen-...395.0.html https://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-Ryzen-...980.0.html Also: https://www.techpowerup.com/review/zotac-zone/
This comparison isn't very helpful for MSFS X. It was launched 14 years prior to MSFS 2020. I haven't played them myself, but that suggests the specs will be completely different. The game relies on DirectX 9.0c and needs at least 2 GB of RAM plus a 2 GHz single-core processor.
You should consider a device that supports Windows rather than SteamOS, since MSFSX isn't compatible with it. This immediately disqualifies the SteamDeck. The ROG Ally Extreme can handle MSFS 2020 and 2024 at roughly 40fps based on online benchmarks. The Zotac Zone isn't accessible anywhere; where it exists it's heavily modified. It features an AMOLED display, but the Ally provides a 1080p 120Hz screen with VRR. Users who've tested both report a superior overall Windows experience compared to the Zone. Currently there are more negative reviews about the Zone, while the Ally offers a more polished feel. If you're searching now, I'd recommend the Ally over the Zone or SteamDeck. If you're patient and wait for the Zone to be released at its advertised price, it could be worth considering.