F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop X58性能提升技巧

X58性能提升技巧

X58性能提升技巧

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
B
BTorres_Gamer
Junior Member
40
01-22-2017, 04:39 AM
#11
Typical daily charging is about 1.45V. Some sources mention 1.6V as a safe upper limit.
B
BTorres_Gamer
01-22-2017, 04:39 AM #11

Typical daily charging is about 1.45V. Some sources mention 1.6V as a safe upper limit.

C
Creepermillion
Junior Member
41
01-22-2017, 04:39 AM
#12
I wasn’t talking about a regular schedule, that’s why I mentioned winter breaks. But I’m fine with around 1.55 each day—just as long as it stays cool.
C
Creepermillion
01-22-2017, 04:39 AM #12

I wasn’t talking about a regular schedule, that’s why I mentioned winter breaks. But I’m fine with around 1.55 each day—just as long as it stays cool.

X
xBryanG_
Member
52
01-22-2017, 04:39 AM
#13
This spec is closer to 22nm with a rating around 1.55v, though it’s not just 1.4v anymore. That voltage was typical back then when the X58 was still costly and demand wasn’t high. In about an hour after powering up, it already started functioning on 5G. From what I understand, the actual tolerance is similar to C2D specs, usually between 1.6v and 1.7v. The highest standard voltage listed for regular Intel chips is often near that range. For C2D, it can even reach up to 1.7v without issues, and the Vcore isn’t a major concern on older boards because they handle heat well. Cooling remains the main bottleneck here. Even a single car radiator might not be enough to fully unlock the X58’s potential. The P6 is decent but still falls short compared to the X58’s capabilities. As long as the board can support 5G, I won’t be overly concerned about voltage limits—just aim for something around 1.4v or higher if possible.
X
xBryanG_
01-22-2017, 04:39 AM #13

This spec is closer to 22nm with a rating around 1.55v, though it’s not just 1.4v anymore. That voltage was typical back then when the X58 was still costly and demand wasn’t high. In about an hour after powering up, it already started functioning on 5G. From what I understand, the actual tolerance is similar to C2D specs, usually between 1.6v and 1.7v. The highest standard voltage listed for regular Intel chips is often near that range. For C2D, it can even reach up to 1.7v without issues, and the Vcore isn’t a major concern on older boards because they handle heat well. Cooling remains the main bottleneck here. Even a single car radiator might not be enough to fully unlock the X58’s potential. The P6 is decent but still falls short compared to the X58’s capabilities. As long as the board can support 5G, I won’t be overly concerned about voltage limits—just aim for something around 1.4v or higher if possible.

H
Hatefulness
Member
145
01-22-2017, 04:39 AM
#14
32nm and 22nm were designed for 1.55, I believe. My 3770K didn’t handle 1.525 at all. It was just one step short of the OVP when it was turned on—it only managed 4900 because of that.
H
Hatefulness
01-22-2017, 04:39 AM #14

32nm and 22nm were designed for 1.55, I believe. My 3770K didn’t handle 1.525 at all. It was just one step short of the OVP when it was turned on—it only managed 4900 because of that.

F
FanEnsemble
Member
237
01-22-2017, 04:39 AM
#15
Well spec is a bit cautious in this generation, only changing by 0.1v. The 1.45v setting seems too strict, making it better than that. Isn't it something you can turn off using tools like elmor evc2? Because evc2 should support features such as disabling protections and handling voltage changes automatically, eliminating the need for a voltmod. If I get a proper bench board that's not just a low-end ASUS board, maybe I'll skip voltmod to get finer control over voltage adjustments, potentially allowing even more precise tuning than what's available in BIOS.
F
FanEnsemble
01-22-2017, 04:39 AM #15

Well spec is a bit cautious in this generation, only changing by 0.1v. The 1.45v setting seems too strict, making it better than that. Isn't it something you can turn off using tools like elmor evc2? Because evc2 should support features such as disabling protections and handling voltage changes automatically, eliminating the need for a voltmod. If I get a proper bench board that's not just a low-end ASUS board, maybe I'll skip voltmod to get finer control over voltage adjustments, potentially allowing even more precise tuning than what's available in BIOS.

T
theTomBomb2
Member
117
01-22-2017, 04:39 AM
#16
The guide is available directly within the system settings. It’s worth revisiting if you decide to choose an Asus model—opt for the premium option for the best performance.
T
theTomBomb2
01-22-2017, 04:39 AM #16

The guide is available directly within the system settings. It’s worth revisiting if you decide to choose an Asus model—opt for the premium option for the best performance.

F
FrancisDragon
Member
213
01-22-2017, 04:39 AM
#17
And boards below the best or close to it are essentially useless since the ASUS BIOS often causes problems and doesn’t support settings. Honestly, I prefer Giga over ASUS now because of the consistently terrible performance of ASUS BIOS (no settings, frequent crashes, etc.).
F
FrancisDragon
01-22-2017, 04:39 AM #17

And boards below the best or close to it are essentially useless since the ASUS BIOS often causes problems and doesn’t support settings. Honestly, I prefer Giga over ASUS now because of the consistently terrible performance of ASUS BIOS (no settings, frequent crashes, etc.).

K
KawiianMili
Posting Freak
786
01-22-2017, 04:39 AM
#18
I hear you, buddy! I don't go for cheap boards, learned that the hard way. I prefer their ROG models. They used to build solid mid-range gear, and some of my older 775 boards are still working fine—just not with me anymore. My current setup is a Rampage Formula DDR2, which handled 550fps daily stability and was limited to 600fps due to my G.Skill 1066 specs. I still earned a top spot in Forum Warz that year, thanks to the Overclocker subscription I won for about five years. I also had a X58 UD5 board, but it had poor voltage control and would drop under load—really disappointing. It looked good, felt decent, but the BIOS was terrible and the voltage regulation was bad. When I got my R3F, I never regretted it. My friend still runs it today, proving it's built to last.
K
KawiianMili
01-22-2017, 04:39 AM #18

I hear you, buddy! I don't go for cheap boards, learned that the hard way. I prefer their ROG models. They used to build solid mid-range gear, and some of my older 775 boards are still working fine—just not with me anymore. My current setup is a Rampage Formula DDR2, which handled 550fps daily stability and was limited to 600fps due to my G.Skill 1066 specs. I still earned a top spot in Forum Warz that year, thanks to the Overclocker subscription I won for about five years. I also had a X58 UD5 board, but it had poor voltage control and would drop under load—really disappointing. It looked good, felt decent, but the BIOS was terrible and the voltage regulation was bad. When I got my R3F, I never regretted it. My friend still runs it today, proving it's built to last.

J
JokerFame
Senior Member
670
01-22-2017, 04:39 AM
#19
If they kept running for 12 years, it probably wasn't misleading advertising. Vdroop seems pretty bad but at least there are different LLC options compared to ASUS where it's just on or off (p6x58d bios). I own an EP45 DS4P, but it doesn’t even have an LLC feature which I don’t mind since Vdroop is around 0.04-0.06v. My P5Q, on the other hand, has Vdroop ranging from 0.04 to 0.08v.
J
JokerFame
01-22-2017, 04:39 AM #19

If they kept running for 12 years, it probably wasn't misleading advertising. Vdroop seems pretty bad but at least there are different LLC options compared to ASUS where it's just on or off (p6x58d bios). I own an EP45 DS4P, but it doesn’t even have an LLC feature which I don’t mind since Vdroop is around 0.04-0.06v. My P5Q, on the other hand, has Vdroop ranging from 0.04 to 0.08v.

L
Llabros
Senior Member
740
01-22-2017, 04:39 AM
#20
I've been experimenting with OC and trying to locate a reliable one, but no matter the settings it won't run smoothly—4.4GHz even at 1.4V. I'm pretty sure this chip isn't worth it. During stability tests with minimal FFTs, I confirmed stability under lower clock speeds, so if it fails then it's likely a poor choice. I noticed fluctuations in multi and clocks during higher load tests, which might point to thermal throttling. I can't confirm it, but I'll check real temperatures and throttle data for accuracy. Maybe adding water cooling would help with this overheating issue.
L
Llabros
01-22-2017, 04:39 AM #20

I've been experimenting with OC and trying to locate a reliable one, but no matter the settings it won't run smoothly—4.4GHz even at 1.4V. I'm pretty sure this chip isn't worth it. During stability tests with minimal FFTs, I confirmed stability under lower clock speeds, so if it fails then it's likely a poor choice. I noticed fluctuations in multi and clocks during higher load tests, which might point to thermal throttling. I can't confirm it, but I'll check real temperatures and throttle data for accuracy. Maybe adding water cooling would help with this overheating issue.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2