X299 AORUS Gaming 7 CPU...
X299 AORUS Gaming 7 CPU...
i believe i found an X299 AORUS Gaming 7 MB on eBay. The listing mentions a GIGABYTE X299X AORUS MASTER, but the picture shows an X299 AORUS Gaming 7. I’m looking for a CPU that’s affordable for now and easier to upgrade later when prices drop. Would it be okay to use an i7-7800X QS or similar models? Other options not listed could work too. Updated May 31, 2022 by thrasher_565
What’s included in the QS? The list shows prices for several processors and their respective models.
Certainly, it's important to consider whether it's a newer or older ES. Avoid earlier models with CPUs that aren't in the latest line, but later ones work well and are mostly the same as retail chips.
The page is from eBay Canada. It was last updated on May 31, 2022 by thrasher_565.
Specific boards are compatible with ES chips most of the time, like ASRock or ASUS WS models, though you'd need to search extensively. QS chips work too, as they're a prototype version of retail CPUs. I recommend the 7920X since ES chips have uncertain support, and the QS is a 7800X which isn't great for gaming—especially with its limited 28 PCIe lanes, making it hard to use all slots if you plan to add many cards.
It seems like this setup has two 2.2 monitors, but it's unclear how many Lanes it uses. A 16GB RAM likely won't be enough for one GPU, probably never will. I doubt the RAM supports multiple lanes. For gaming, 16GB should suffice for Diablo 2 and Minecraft. This is more of a preference than necessity, and I’m planning to finalize my build this summer. I have a 6600K and a GTX 1080, which are sufficient for my needs. However, I’ll still keep the 6600K for general use and stick with the GTX 1080 for gaming. With newer operating systems, Steam becomes challenging, so I might need to create an offline build. I’m not sure yet, but I hope to get everything ready soon.
For gaming purposes only, it's perfectly acceptable. NVMe SSDs offer four PCIe lanes, which together with the GPU provides a total of 24 lanes. The chipset typically uses four lanes, bringing the overall bandwidth to around 28. RAM performance is also distinct; these chips support quad channel configurations, and using four sticks in the right slots can significantly boost speed—especially for large data transfers without affecting latency. The 1080p performance remains solid, matching the capabilities of my 2060 Super, and it handles 1440p or even 4K at times with some adjustments. I believe these components would likely outperform the 6600K, especially if you have a higher-end model like the 6700K or 7700K. The mesh architecture on X299 chips affects latency more than bandwidth, making them less ideal for competitive gaming compared to ringbus-based Intel processors.
Here’s a clearer version of your thoughts:
You’re considering the i9-7900X $221 for the build, thinking it might be useful if needed. You’ll likely need four RAM sticks. Should I go with the more expensive RAM module or look for cheaper options and use water cooling heat spreaders instead? The spreaders could save you money later by allowing future upgrades. You’re aiming for a 3080 or 3090, but trying to find a good deal with an active back plate. I doubt AMD offers a GPU with an active back plate—those seem inefficient since they put VRAM on the back. Still, it looks great and is a stylish setup. Hopefully this helps!
Non-ES should be fine. Standard speeds around 3200 or 3600MHz work well without needing extra RAM. Watercooling RAM adds complexity—expensive fittings, more connectors, longer tubing runs—but it can look nice. If you're just going for style, check out block options like Bitspower, Alphacool, or Watercool. These brands often offer compatible RAM with heatsinks that fit the block. Make sure the RAM matches your GPU’s specifications. AMD doesn’t use GDDR6X, so Nvidia cards need an active backplate. Many VRAM chips sit on the back of the PCB, making GDDR6X very power-hungry and hot.