F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Windows To Go experiences delays during startup.

Windows To Go experiences delays during startup.

Windows To Go experiences delays during startup.

S
squareder
Member
133
08-02-2025, 04:18 AM
#1
Hi, your Windows To Go USB is taking a long time to boot, even though you've tested it on a VM. This could be due to the speed of the flash drive you're using. Flash drives often have slower read and write speeds compared to traditional storage devices. It might help to try a different USB drive or ensure the drive is properly seated. Let me know if you need more details! Thanks!
S
squareder
08-02-2025, 04:18 AM #1

Hi, your Windows To Go USB is taking a long time to boot, even though you've tested it on a VM. This could be due to the speed of the flash drive you're using. Flash drives often have slower read and write speeds compared to traditional storage devices. It might help to try a different USB drive or ensure the drive is properly seated. Let me know if you need more details! Thanks!

H
65
08-10-2025, 01:30 AM
#2
Affordable options tend to be slower, but even the cheapest flash drives shouldn’t require an hour to load. It might mean the device is faulty or the operating system image is corrupted.
H
hungry_hippo10
08-10-2025, 01:30 AM #2

Affordable options tend to be slower, but even the cheapest flash drives shouldn’t require an hour to load. It might mean the device is faulty or the operating system image is corrupted.

I
iTz_NightWolf
Member
70
08-10-2025, 02:30 AM
#3
Begin with Windows not launching smoothly from a flash drive. At least rely on an external hard drive, ideally an SSD. It must have started up already, even if speed is poor. Have you used WinToUSB?
I
iTz_NightWolf
08-10-2025, 02:30 AM #3

Begin with Windows not launching smoothly from a flash drive. At least rely on an external hard drive, ideally an SSD. It must have started up already, even if speed is poor. Have you used WinToUSB?

G
211
08-10-2025, 08:39 AM
#4
I attempted WinToUSB initially, but later read recommendations suggesting Rufus as a more dependable option.
G
george_griveas
08-10-2025, 08:39 AM #4

I attempted WinToUSB initially, but later read recommendations suggesting Rufus as a more dependable option.

C
ChloeET
Senior Member
736
08-10-2025, 05:20 PM
#5
USB3 flash drives lag behind USB3 external SSDs. I haven’t tested running Windows, but starting Linux from a USB took around 30 minutes.
C
ChloeET
08-10-2025, 05:20 PM #5

USB3 flash drives lag behind USB3 external SSDs. I haven’t tested running Windows, but starting Linux from a USB took around 30 minutes.

F
Fufuit
Member
174
08-10-2025, 08:00 PM
#6
Did you unintentionally connect it to a potato or just use faulty USB drives? I’ve made Linux persistent storage sticks before using Rufus and they functioned okay. Windows might be an issue since it isn’t built for it, but Linux is often used in read-only live installers and is actually meant to work well from a USB drive.
F
Fufuit
08-10-2025, 08:00 PM #6

Did you unintentionally connect it to a potato or just use faulty USB drives? I’ve made Linux persistent storage sticks before using Rufus and they functioned okay. Windows might be an issue since it isn’t built for it, but Linux is often used in read-only live installers and is actually meant to work well from a USB drive.

F
FanvonLOGO
Member
61
08-28-2025, 09:28 PM
#7
Linux functioned perfectly on the storage device, and the laptop connected to it boasted around 12 GB of memory along with an i5 chip.
F
FanvonLOGO
08-28-2025, 09:28 PM #7

Linux functioned perfectly on the storage device, and the laptop connected to it boasted around 12 GB of memory along with an i5 chip.

S
Samu02
Member
184
08-29-2025, 12:51 AM
#8
The USB came from SanDisk.
S
Samu02
08-29-2025, 12:51 AM #8

The USB came from SanDisk.

S
SoulzReaped
Member
217
09-02-2025, 01:56 PM
#9
I've dealt with a USB 3 flash drive that doesn't match its advertised speed. It feels like they're using a basic chip for a USB 2.0 budget device, yet the controller claims high performance. Personally, I think it's a company trying to mimic a hybrid by having a lead-acid battery, or something similar to ASRock—where they made a motherboard that says it supports 65W+ TDP CPU, but in reality, it can't deliver full power because the power delivery circuit is limited. Maybe ASRock hired the same marketing team. Still, run a speed test on your drive and don't rely only on read speeds or connector type—remember those phones with USB Type-C that tricked people into thinking they were USB 3?
S
SoulzReaped
09-02-2025, 01:56 PM #9

I've dealt with a USB 3 flash drive that doesn't match its advertised speed. It feels like they're using a basic chip for a USB 2.0 budget device, yet the controller claims high performance. Personally, I think it's a company trying to mimic a hybrid by having a lead-acid battery, or something similar to ASRock—where they made a motherboard that says it supports 65W+ TDP CPU, but in reality, it can't deliver full power because the power delivery circuit is limited. Maybe ASRock hired the same marketing team. Still, run a speed test on your drive and don't rely only on read speeds or connector type—remember those phones with USB Type-C that tricked people into thinking they were USB 3?