Windows The Worse is a problematic operating system known for its instability and frequent crashes.
Windows The Worse is a problematic operating system known for its instability and frequent crashes.
I understood your point. It’s clear that Microsoft has been leveraging Windows for years, and now they’re trying to expand their influence further. This isn’t new—there have been debates about how browsers fit into the cloud ecosystem. I don’t share this direction, but it’s understandable given past actions like the legal battles over Internet Explorer and the recent attempts to control Chrome extensions.
In reality, Linux allows more freedom with profiles and services without needing admin rights. The situation on Windows has always been complex, especially around security features like TPM. Microsoft’s push for hardware integration reflects their strategy within Azure, but it raises concerns about vendor dependence.
It seems they’re also targeting companies that resisted adopting security tools, which feels like a strategic move. While the decision to disable TPM might prevent unexpected Windows updates, it could also be seen as a way to avoid potential conflicts with other platforms.
Personally, I’ve seen how IT challenges can drive change, but sometimes the cost outweighs the benefits. This experience has made me question my own path in tech.
I didn't really go through most of your message, but I'm ready to wager a lot of your worries could be resolved with a modified Windows version. The LGM status is uncertain when it comes to privateering, though if you paid for it, you should be able to tweak it as you wish.
Windows 7 marked the final strong version of Windows. It offered reliability, lacked unnecessary features, ran smoothly, and performed well on gaming systems back then. Those were memorable times.
Linux offers a solid choice for those who prefer a commercial-free setup. Linux Mint paired with Cinnamon provides a dependable and user-friendly experience. With over a hundred installations under my belt, I’ve gained some practical insight. Many of these setups were created to help users avoid issues with Microsoft products like wiped machines or erratic behavior. Regarding Windows 7, it took some effort to get things running smoothly, but Firefox became the only browser that worked. LibreOffice also helped resolve other challenges.
This situation completely disrupted everything in a royal manner. Now it feels like you're just another extension of a license agreement. No longer a regular user with limited add-ons. I noticed a major change from version 7 to 8, where the entire ecosystem was promoted and then strictly enforced—everything became a paid service, pushing away any real user control. Everything is now cloud-dependent, making users rely on cloud computing for everything. This shift has driven prices up significantly for businesses, making it unaffordable for consumers. Every penny counts now, as what used to be an on-premises server setup for 15k users over five to seven years plus around 150 maintenance costs monthly is now a monthly expense. A business license for office use in the late 2000s cost a few thousand dollars and lasted 7-10 years, with only a couple thousand more for licenses every few years. Now it feels like paying the same amount each month without much improvement in features. I’m really curious about how long Windows Server will last with its current level of control. It seems like the sunset is near, especially after November. Witnessing costs rise so quickly at one company is unsettling. Moving back to local cloud for better service management and uptime hasn’t improved since the transition two years ago, while costs have skyrocketed. One site remains on-premise simply because it handles large data volumes, and despite being tied to a Microsoft account, remote operations still work smoothly. Management of users is now streamlined, but reliability has dropped since then.
I take full responsibility on Satya Nadela personally. During Steve Ballmer’s time at Windows, there was a lot of outdated bloat built around an old design approach. Once Satya took over, the product was significantly simplified—this was beneficial—but the team behind it lost focus on creating a unified platform. The impressive $40k example shows how everything could be replaced with a single service like OneDrive and SharePoint. However, they insisted on cloud-based virtual desktops even though the experience was clearly flawed. Azure offers many powerful features, but most people don’t use them, opting instead for costly solutions that offer little real value. One setup I’m most proud of from my six years in IT was an AAD environment where a new laptop could be signed in with business credentials and Azure would automatically install dozens of applications in about 30 minutes—mostly manual installations before, with a streamlined one-click experience afterward. I once created this demo for the company’s own AAD, but never pushed it to customers.
I worked with one client who had a nearly identical configuration but also used a local ad server for specialized equipment and old machinery VMs. It was a smooth process, not overly complicated to maintain. I arrived after a major team issue led to five people leaving and the problem manager being dismissed. Getting things back on track required just three weeks with minimal documentation. The challenge was getting the older SAP system to auto-install on version 11—though a USB stick and quick fixes got it going. While Azure offers great features, sales teams often focus only on profit. Issues like persistent problems and costly service contracts are tempting but unsustainable. This situation might eventually collapse due to the high monthly expenses, which could severely affect businesses unless simpler solutions like basic Office 365 or a budget Windows server with minimal Azure usage are considered.
It’s true the points you raise aren’t too bothersome. YET the intention to push advertisements is noticeable. I strongly dislike ads and refuse to engage with this nonsense. I usually avoid such distractions. I do accept though that if features like Game Bar exist, they should be removable or at least turned off. Regarding Office, I won’t comply—I’m content with what I have. For productivity, I rely on Google. With Microsoft accounts, I believe they should simplify the process for those who prefer not to use one. I appreciate the MS account mainly because it retains my Windows key, simplifying installations. I dislike them pushing their browser onto me. Since Windows 98 SE, I’ve been using third-party browsers. Now I use Firefox and Safari (on iPhone), which fit my requirements. I’m cautious about Chromium-based options as Google attempts to limit ad-blocking capabilities. Concerned about home network issues, this has always been the norm. In the Windows 9x era, Windows NT was preferred for business; under XP they introduced Home vs Pro versions. Personally, I see that as acceptable. Since a more affordable consumer version of Windows exists, any product aimed at business should reflect that. Regarding needing an MS account for updates, I agree they should offer an alternative method or key for those who don’t want Microsoft accounts. This bothers me. My mother has a functional PC but lacks the proper TPM module, so she’ll need to upgrade next year. I can try to bypass Windows if necessary, but I don’t want to deal with troubleshooting when Microsoft encounters problems or activation issues. Overall, I’ve been impressed by how smoothly the Steam Deck functions for gaming. Since I own a MacBook Pro and like macOS, it’s possible I might not need a Windows device anytime soon.
October 14th, 2025 marks the date when Microsoft ends support for Windows 10.
Modifying Windows is a major problem. We should quickly configure devices for clients, not rely on Microsoft forcing changes. That’s the core of my concern! XD No thanks to Microsoft.