Windows Server 2012
Windows Server 2012
Server versions of Windows resemble standard Windows without the features consumers typically use (hard to imagine right now...). Adding server functionalities such as DNS Server capabilities would be similar. The consumer features I mentioned, like Windows Media Player, aren’t necessary on a server but are present in regular operating systems. You can add all these components and also install other Windows 8 applications, though I’m not sure how effective that would be.
Server 2012 and R2 are kept minimal (no unnecessary features, just essential services). Security is tightened (strict defaults, mandatory passwords, etc.) and drivers for Server 2012 must be signed specifically for that version—unless you turn off driver signing. If you intend to use it, ensure your hardware matches; otherwise, expect a lot of troubleshooting and frustration. Server 2012 is highly reliable and well-organized (some licenses available through my university), but it leans heavily toward functionality over aesthetics. If you're undecided, consider Windows 8—it might be pricier, but it’s simpler for non-admin users and avoids the hassle. Don’t waste effort on a hammer when you need a drill. Compare options carefully.
I aim to create a setup for your friend without overspending, and I could share a PC component guide if you're interested.
If your friend doesn’t have admin skills or deep knowledge of Server OS, consider the extra cost. Server 2012 works best in a narrow use case. Opting for it just because it’s cheaper than a desktop isn’t wise.
Server 2012 Essential offers the best value for small businesses since it includes a set number of devices and user licenses. Prices are lower when bundled, unlike the Standard version which requires separate purchase. You can find more details at the provided links.