Windows 10 LTSC or Windows 11 Pro RTM
Windows 10 LTSC or Windows 11 Pro RTM
I chose to reinstall Windows on my work laptop—a Asus TUF FX505DT equipped with Ryzen 3550H, 16GB RAM, and GTX1650M. Because Windows 10 22H2 is no longer supported, I didn’t install it. Now I’m unsure whether to go with Windows 10 LTSC or upgrade to Windows 11 25H2. The laptop won’t be used for gaming; instead, I’ll mainly rely on Microsoft Office and photo editing with PS CS6, with occasional video streaming. Between the two options, which one fits better? Also, how much does the LTSC version differ from the Pro channel?
Win 10 RTM has been unavailable for a long time. Win 10 22H2 is no longer supported, yet you can receive one year of extra security patches by joining ESU. Regarding your question about a work-issued device, clarify with IT what they need installed. Otherwise, I’d prefer Windows 11 at that stage. LTSC will get even more updates in the future, but it isn’t something a typical user can legally buy.
Windows 10 LTSC IoT offers strong support through 2032. It’s not illegal, though it sits in a somewhat ambiguous zone with IoT licensing—purchasing options are available via platforms like TechYesCity YouTube links. The main issue is the absence of a Windows Store for this version, but alternatives exist if you need integration with Microsoft Office. For those prioritizing stability and performance, Windows 10 provides a more familiar experience compared to Windows 11, with less bloat and better productivity. Linux could be worth considering too, especially if you’re open to exploring options like PS CS6 or open-source office tools. The situation remains somewhat unclear, as licensing and store availability are still debated.
It needs a Microsoft account for registration. ESU is complimentary within the EU; elsewhere it costs $30. Otherwise, it remains unclear. Microsoft doesn't directly market these VLKs to consumers. The source of these items by key resellers is uncertain.
My argument remains valid regardless of whether they sell directly to consumers; it's still a significant step to label it as illegal.
It was just understood they needed to provide it at no cost to individuals within the EU for a specific reason.
The licensing conditions restrict unauthorized distribution and use. Just because Microsoft isn’t pursuing legal action doesn’t confirm compliance. It’s unlikely they view extra licenses as profitable to sell. The seller receives $15, while the buyer perceives a $140 product for that amount. The developer receives nothing. This situation raises questions about fairness—especially if you’re concerned about hidden costs in software purchases. Morally, it mirrors buying the keys at face value, though legally it’s still questionable. I’m not endorsing bypassing payment entirely, but it’s worth questioning why intermediaries aren’t removed. The $15 fee is simply a transaction for access, not a fair exchange.