F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Will my computer be able to play these games, Black Flag and Rogue?

Will my computer be able to play these games, Black Flag and Rogue?

Will my computer be able to play these games, Black Flag and Rogue?

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
S
SGgamingDK
Member
222
07-04-2016, 05:52 PM
#1
With a 2.2 GHz processor, Core 2 Duo core, and 6 GB of RAM (3 GB accessible), would I be able to run AC Black Flag?
S
SGgamingDK
07-04-2016, 05:52 PM #1

With a 2.2 GHz processor, Core 2 Duo core, and 6 GB of RAM (3 GB accessible), would I be able to run AC Black Flag?

K
kladdis1
Junior Member
39
07-04-2016, 08:43 PM
#2
For Rogue, a minimum processor is a Q6600 and for Black Flag, a Q8400 is recommended. Consequently, you might experience slowdowns or inconsistent gameplay. I personally utilized an i3-550 with 8GB of RAM and a GTX 460 for both games, which operated satisfactorily.
K
kladdis1
07-04-2016, 08:43 PM #2

For Rogue, a minimum processor is a Q6600 and for Black Flag, a Q8400 is recommended. Consequently, you might experience slowdowns or inconsistent gameplay. I personally utilized an i3-550 with 8GB of RAM and a GTX 460 for both games, which operated satisfactorily.

J
Jack80156
Member
60
07-05-2016, 10:03 PM
#3
A 2.2 GHz Core2Duo processor won't perform well with contemporary games, regardless of the graphics card you have paired with those specifications.
J
Jack80156
07-05-2016, 10:03 PM #3

A 2.2 GHz Core2Duo processor won't perform well with contemporary games, regardless of the graphics card you have paired with those specifications.

A
Ac1dicBlitzz
Member
206
07-06-2016, 01:42 AM
#4
AC IV can run on an E4500 (2.2 GHz C2D), but it performs noticeably sluggishly even at 720p resolution. Numerous videos online show AC IV running on an E4500 with a 9600GT. This runs at all Normal graphics settings. It’s crucial to disable PhysX, as it malfunctions within this game and leads to significant stuttering. You'll likely experience the most lag during ship invasions and naval combat against fortifications, particularly when facing larger ships and defensive structures. You may also want to disable Volumetric Fog and God Rays, and set Environment Quality to Low for smoother gameplay. Considering this, purchasing the game through Steam is advisable if you haven’t already, allowing for a potential return within Steam's standard 2-hour window. However, please verify the refund policy details on their website as it may have been updated recently.

Steam Refunds
store.steampowered.com
https://www.geforce.com/whats-new/g...-i...ance-guide
A
Ac1dicBlitzz
07-06-2016, 01:42 AM #4

AC IV can run on an E4500 (2.2 GHz C2D), but it performs noticeably sluggishly even at 720p resolution. Numerous videos online show AC IV running on an E4500 with a 9600GT. This runs at all Normal graphics settings. It’s crucial to disable PhysX, as it malfunctions within this game and leads to significant stuttering. You'll likely experience the most lag during ship invasions and naval combat against fortifications, particularly when facing larger ships and defensive structures. You may also want to disable Volumetric Fog and God Rays, and set Environment Quality to Low for smoother gameplay. Considering this, purchasing the game through Steam is advisable if you haven’t already, allowing for a potential return within Steam's standard 2-hour window. However, please verify the refund policy details on their website as it may have been updated recently.

Steam Refunds
store.steampowered.com
https://www.geforce.com/whats-new/g...-i...ance-guide

A
AaronKeefe_
Junior Member
11
07-07-2016, 07:03 AM
#5
Many clocks are beneficial.

A majority can achieve a 3 GHz speed with relative ease, and I personally maintain an E4500 that has consistently operated at 3 GHz since its initial setup, appreciating those C2Ds.
A
AaronKeefe_
07-07-2016, 07:03 AM #5

Many clocks are beneficial.

A majority can achieve a 3 GHz speed with relative ease, and I personally maintain an E4500 that has consistently operated at 3 GHz since its initial setup, appreciating those C2Ds.

S
SpicyItem
Junior Member
12
07-09-2016, 04:05 PM
#6
YouTube's representation of gameplay performance on specific hardware configurations may not be entirely precise. Providing a more targeted example illustrating this discrepancy would be beneficial, rather than offering generalized criticisms that could appear unproductive.
S
SpicyItem
07-09-2016, 04:05 PM #6

YouTube's representation of gameplay performance on specific hardware configurations may not be entirely precise. Providing a more targeted example illustrating this discrepancy would be beneficial, rather than offering generalized criticisms that could appear unproductive.

G
195
07-09-2016, 09:25 PM
#7
Let’s postpone discussing the details and observe first if the original poster responds, and then determine their graphics card specifications – that will be crucial in making a decision.
G
GetShrekedN00B
07-09-2016, 09:25 PM #7

Let’s postpone discussing the details and observe first if the original poster responds, and then determine their graphics card specifications – that will be crucial in making a decision.

B
burak123123
Member
224
07-17-2016, 02:58 AM
#8
Certainly, but it’s also worth considering that minimum processor requirements can occasionally be deceptive. The E4500 achieved approximately 48% of the performance rating of the Q8400 on Passmark, even though a modest graphics card at that era could run most of the game at a frame rate likely suitable for many gamers on a limited budget. The lack of clarity from the original poster and other commenters adds to this point; this can render a potentially helpful discussion unproductive.
B
burak123123
07-17-2016, 02:58 AM #8

Certainly, but it’s also worth considering that minimum processor requirements can occasionally be deceptive. The E4500 achieved approximately 48% of the performance rating of the Q8400 on Passmark, even though a modest graphics card at that era could run most of the game at a frame rate likely suitable for many gamers on a limited budget. The lack of clarity from the original poster and other commenters adds to this point; this can render a potentially helpful discussion unproductive.

D
DreaMaker20
Member
124
08-06-2016, 01:59 PM
#9
The video was captured with a processor running at 2.6 gigahertz, not the 2.2 gigahertz that was not readily visible during viewing. My statement referencing "E4500 Core 2 Duo OC'd to 2.6Ghz" was based on specifications provided in the YouTube description, which I assumed would be clear. I apologize for any misunderstanding this may have caused.
D
DreaMaker20
08-06-2016, 01:59 PM #9

The video was captured with a processor running at 2.6 gigahertz, not the 2.2 gigahertz that was not readily visible during viewing. My statement referencing "E4500 Core 2 Duo OC'd to 2.6Ghz" was based on specifications provided in the YouTube description, which I assumed would be clear. I apologize for any misunderstanding this may have caused.

I
IFoskuruR3KT
Member
62
08-06-2016, 07:14 PM
#10
If I keep insisting on uttering just one more thing, even when requested to remain silent, I’ll feel deeply wounded.
I
IFoskuruR3KT
08-06-2016, 07:14 PM #10

If I keep insisting on uttering just one more thing, even when requested to remain silent, I’ll feel deeply wounded.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next