F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks WiFi extender device for improving network coverage

WiFi extender device for improving network coverage

WiFi extender device for improving network coverage

G
GirlySoCute_
Junior Member
6
07-17-2016, 02:07 PM
#1
Hi everyone, I just moved into a new house and now have a spot with no Wi-Fi signal. We’re using Fibre1000 with the standard “ultrahub” router from our ISP. From there, I run a network cable to my office in this dead zone where I’ve set up a TP link switch for my PCs. I’m checking out plug-in range extenders that work in OR Ap mode, but I want a solution that doesn’t require switching networks based on location. Should I go with a plug-in device connected to the switch all the time, or should I try a more affordable AC6 router and disable DCHP so it acts like an extension? I’m leaning toward the AC6 but would really appreciate advice from someone experienced.
G
GirlySoCute_
07-17-2016, 02:07 PM #1

Hi everyone, I just moved into a new house and now have a spot with no Wi-Fi signal. We’re using Fibre1000 with the standard “ultrahub” router from our ISP. From there, I run a network cable to my office in this dead zone where I’ve set up a TP link switch for my PCs. I’m checking out plug-in range extenders that work in OR Ap mode, but I want a solution that doesn’t require switching networks based on location. Should I go with a plug-in device connected to the switch all the time, or should I try a more affordable AC6 router and disable DCHP so it acts like an extension? I’m leaning toward the AC6 but would really appreciate advice from someone experienced.

M
MC_Blue_ALERT
Junior Member
18
07-25-2016, 04:11 AM
#2
Router operating in AP mode or without DHCP enabled, or a dedicated Access Point. This setup works well when you only require a few connected devices, as it can fully replace the switch, conserving a port and power source. An Access Point is ideal for small business models, allowing ceiling mounting for maximum coverage. I prefer not to use plug-in units because they can't be moved for better signal strength, and their antennas often provide less gain. I suspect the power supply unit inside may cause interference. To avoid naming conflicts, keep the SSID identical on both devices; once reception drops, they'll switch to each other. This might leave your device tied to the weaker signal as you move away, though a mesh network designed for this scenario would be helpful. Generally, it's wise to assign different names to 2.4GHz and 5GHz channels for the same reason—devices favor 2.4GHz for its stronger signal, even though 5GHz with weaker coverage can sometimes be faster and more dependable.
M
MC_Blue_ALERT
07-25-2016, 04:11 AM #2

Router operating in AP mode or without DHCP enabled, or a dedicated Access Point. This setup works well when you only require a few connected devices, as it can fully replace the switch, conserving a port and power source. An Access Point is ideal for small business models, allowing ceiling mounting for maximum coverage. I prefer not to use plug-in units because they can't be moved for better signal strength, and their antennas often provide less gain. I suspect the power supply unit inside may cause interference. To avoid naming conflicts, keep the SSID identical on both devices; once reception drops, they'll switch to each other. This might leave your device tied to the weaker signal as you move away, though a mesh network designed for this scenario would be helpful. Generally, it's wise to assign different names to 2.4GHz and 5GHz channels for the same reason—devices favor 2.4GHz for its stronger signal, even though 5GHz with weaker coverage can sometimes be faster and more dependable.