F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Why people choose Intel?

Why people choose Intel?

Why people choose Intel?

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next
C
Charliemc909
Posting Freak
898
01-17-2023, 02:10 PM
#1
Many buyers still choose Intel when AMD offers processors with double the threads at the same price as Intel. Some claim Intel chips are more energy-efficient, though 10/20W isn't a huge concern. In games, Intel tends to edge out AMD, but in other areas it's the opposite. I don’t like overclocking, so it doesn’t interest me much. Are there any other aspects I’m missing? Is this about durability or reliability? I’m not a tech expert and locally no one can give a clear answer. Everyone just says Intel is better than AMD. Why do they say that? Please let me know. Thank you.
C
Charliemc909
01-17-2023, 02:10 PM #1

Many buyers still choose Intel when AMD offers processors with double the threads at the same price as Intel. Some claim Intel chips are more energy-efficient, though 10/20W isn't a huge concern. In games, Intel tends to edge out AMD, but in other areas it's the opposite. I don’t like overclocking, so it doesn’t interest me much. Are there any other aspects I’m missing? Is this about durability or reliability? I’m not a tech expert and locally no one can give a clear answer. Everyone just says Intel is better than AMD. Why do they say that? Please let me know. Thank you.

M
MonicaMiner
Junior Member
14
01-24-2023, 10:23 PM
#2
They typically achieve around 20 extra frames per second in most AAA titles. Certain games, such as ARMA 3, may run poorly on Ryzen processors and end up with significantly lower frame rates. Personally, I favor Ryzen for its better performance relative to cost.
M
MonicaMiner
01-24-2023, 10:23 PM #2

They typically achieve around 20 extra frames per second in most AAA titles. Certain games, such as ARMA 3, may run poorly on Ryzen processors and end up with significantly lower frame rates. Personally, I favor Ryzen for its better performance relative to cost.

G
garto123
Member
53
01-26-2023, 09:54 AM
#3
Because old habits persist. About five years back AMD chips were problematic, generating a lot of heat, whereas Intel i7s ran cooler and performed better. If you reflect on it, AMD Ryzen launched just a year ago, so many people still overlook its advantages. In their minds, AMD is still tied to overheating and poor performance. Yet the new Intel i7 8700K actually delivers slightly higher frame rates in games compared to Ryzen models—what a surprise!
G
garto123
01-26-2023, 09:54 AM #3

Because old habits persist. About five years back AMD chips were problematic, generating a lot of heat, whereas Intel i7s ran cooler and performed better. If you reflect on it, AMD Ryzen launched just a year ago, so many people still overlook its advantages. In their minds, AMD is still tied to overheating and poor performance. Yet the new Intel i7 8700K actually delivers slightly higher frame rates in games compared to Ryzen models—what a surprise!

D
dianarose32129
Senior Member
570
01-26-2023, 11:20 AM
#4
Last time only: Adding more cores or threads doesn’t always boost performance. For a gaming setup, the i7 8700K remains the top choice.
D
dianarose32129
01-26-2023, 11:20 AM #4

Last time only: Adding more cores or threads doesn’t always boost performance. For a gaming setup, the i7 8700K remains the top choice.

R
ratelslang3
Member
167
01-26-2023, 06:35 PM
#5
I haven’t purchased a CPU in several years, yet from what I understand, old routines tend to persist. Many have been using Intel CPUs for a long time and prefer sticking with what they know. Intel has dominated the market, and it will likely take some time for AMD to regain its footing, though they appear to be performing well. Another point I’ve thought about is that when Ryzen launched, there were challenges with RAM compatibility—you needed to match specific types. I assume this issue is mostly resolved now (I haven’t heard much about it recently, but I haven’t investigated deeply), but if I were thinking about buying a new CPU without doing extensive research, I’d likely avoid it.
R
ratelslang3
01-26-2023, 06:35 PM #5

I haven’t purchased a CPU in several years, yet from what I understand, old routines tend to persist. Many have been using Intel CPUs for a long time and prefer sticking with what they know. Intel has dominated the market, and it will likely take some time for AMD to regain its footing, though they appear to be performing well. Another point I’ve thought about is that when Ryzen launched, there were challenges with RAM compatibility—you needed to match specific types. I assume this issue is mostly resolved now (I haven’t heard much about it recently, but I haven’t investigated deeply), but if I were thinking about buying a new CPU without doing extensive research, I’d likely avoid it.

X
XXLucasGameXX
Junior Member
20
01-27-2023, 01:50 AM
#6
Intel remains a stronger option for you because Ryzen requires both CPU and RAM overclocking to achieve comparable performance to Intel. Zen chips provide performance that is either similar or better while offering a better cost efficiency. Intel generally delivers superior overall performance, except possibly in server CPUs—though I recall Epyc being linked with Xeon.
X
XXLucasGameXX
01-27-2023, 01:50 AM #6

Intel remains a stronger option for you because Ryzen requires both CPU and RAM overclocking to achieve comparable performance to Intel. Zen chips provide performance that is either similar or better while offering a better cost efficiency. Intel generally delivers superior overall performance, except possibly in server CPUs—though I recall Epyc being linked with Xeon.

R
Rosen05
Member
152
01-27-2023, 02:44 AM
#7
The large share of CPU sales comes from ready-made options. Manufacturers making these pre-built units have little incentive to switch to Intel. Changes could occur with the Ryzen 3000/4000 lineup, but updates to the environment setup happen gradually.
R
Rosen05
01-27-2023, 02:44 AM #7

The large share of CPU sales comes from ready-made options. Manufacturers making these pre-built units have little incentive to switch to Intel. Changes could occur with the Ryzen 3000/4000 lineup, but updates to the environment setup happen gradually.

L
Lycan2134
Junior Member
6
01-27-2023, 04:28 AM
#8
New Ryzen+ chips and the Ryzen 2000 series don’t really require overclocking because the single-core turbo speed is already higher than what you’d achieve with an overclock. The earlier models had notably slower clock speeds. Epic Games is performing well.
L
Lycan2134
01-27-2023, 04:28 AM #8

New Ryzen+ chips and the Ryzen 2000 series don’t really require overclocking because the single-core turbo speed is already higher than what you’d achieve with an overclock. The earlier models had notably slower clock speeds. Epic Games is performing well.

M
Micel002
Member
153
01-27-2023, 06:06 AM
#9
You can achieve strong gaming performance while saving costs by using the R5 2600 without needing a large 240mm AIO or risking damage. Some setups can work around the limitations through boost override, though it demands higher voltage.
M
Micel002
01-27-2023, 06:06 AM #9

You can achieve strong gaming performance while saving costs by using the R5 2600 without needing a large 240mm AIO or risking damage. Some setups can work around the limitations through boost override, though it demands higher voltage.

W
Waverabbit
Senior Member
643
01-27-2023, 10:31 AM
#10
That clearly conveys your point.
W
Waverabbit
01-27-2023, 10:31 AM #10

That clearly conveys your point.

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next