F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Why no love for strategy gamers

Why no love for strategy gamers

Why no love for strategy gamers

N
Nicocraft666
Member
194
10-30-2023, 01:13 PM
#1
Every release focuses on FPS players because those audiences drive the most revenue, while niche titles like Stellaris often lack the support needed to run smoothly at high difficulty levels.
N
Nicocraft666
10-30-2023, 01:13 PM #1

Every release focuses on FPS players because those audiences drive the most revenue, while niche titles like Stellaris often lack the support needed to run smoothly at high difficulty levels.

D
dubdub112
Member
202
10-30-2023, 01:31 PM
#2
This occurred recently; prior to that, most build guides covered a wide range of genres, from RPGs to FPS titles, alongside graphically demanding games. Strategy titles were particularly reliant on CPU power, which raises the question of why such systems would be designed for only one type of game. It doesn't seem logical. Build guides generally aim to optimize CPU and GPU usage within a specific budget.
D
dubdub112
10-30-2023, 01:31 PM #2

This occurred recently; prior to that, most build guides covered a wide range of genres, from RPGs to FPS titles, alongside graphically demanding games. Strategy titles were particularly reliant on CPU power, which raises the question of why such systems would be designed for only one type of game. It doesn't seem logical. Build guides generally aim to optimize CPU and GPU usage within a specific budget.

D
161
10-30-2023, 03:10 PM
#3
They can't try every game available. They tend to favor matches where they can replicate the exact same performance consistently, without any randomness involved.
D
Deathangel2005
10-30-2023, 03:10 PM #3

They can't try every game available. They tend to favor matches where they can replicate the exact same performance consistently, without any randomness involved.

Z
ZelowS
Member
206
11-01-2023, 07:51 AM
#4
AAA games often feature a mix of shooters and action-adventure titles, with the latter being the most popular and demanding in terms of graphics. This makes them highly engaging for audiences. These games are consistently evaluated based on performance, such as how a PC running a powerful CPU would handle them versus a mid or high-end GPU. I think it would be beneficial if strategy games received more attention, though this doesn’t match the current balance of gameplay types. The choice to focus on AAA titles stems from both popularity and the impact they have on system performance. I’ve built my setup around Cities Skylines, Skyrim, Kerbal Space Program, Football Manager, plus Civ, Terraria, CSGO, and Rocket League. I no longer play AAA games regularly.
Z
ZelowS
11-01-2023, 07:51 AM #4

AAA games often feature a mix of shooters and action-adventure titles, with the latter being the most popular and demanding in terms of graphics. This makes them highly engaging for audiences. These games are consistently evaluated based on performance, such as how a PC running a powerful CPU would handle them versus a mid or high-end GPU. I think it would be beneficial if strategy games received more attention, though this doesn’t match the current balance of gameplay types. The choice to focus on AAA titles stems from both popularity and the impact they have on system performance. I’ve built my setup around Cities Skylines, Skyrim, Kerbal Space Program, Football Manager, plus Civ, Terraria, CSGO, and Rocket League. I no longer play AAA games regularly.

L
libby360
Junior Member
18
11-01-2023, 01:06 PM
#5
Many classic strategy titles struggle with scalability, focusing mainly on raw clock speed rather than broader performance. CIv can help, but options like SC2 or SPFA are quite restricted. I don’t have a specific hardware preference, but I can suggest a range of games and chips that generally perform well. A 3600/3600x chip is often ideal for value, while a high-clocked 3300x might work in older titles with just 2-3 cores. A 3700x is also still a solid choice.
L
libby360
11-01-2023, 01:06 PM #5

Many classic strategy titles struggle with scalability, focusing mainly on raw clock speed rather than broader performance. CIv can help, but options like SC2 or SPFA are quite restricted. I don’t have a specific hardware preference, but I can suggest a range of games and chips that generally perform well. A 3600/3600x chip is often ideal for value, while a high-clocked 3300x might work in older titles with just 2-3 cores. A 3700x is also still a solid choice.

S
Skylaire
Member
104
11-02-2023, 12:14 PM
#6
RTS games are nearly nonexistent except for StarCraft. You can enjoy StarCraft even on a modest CPU and built-in graphics. You don’t have to own an i9 or RTX card.
S
Skylaire
11-02-2023, 12:14 PM #6

RTS games are nearly nonexistent except for StarCraft. You can enjoy StarCraft even on a modest CPU and built-in graphics. You don’t have to own an i9 or RTX card.

E
Eneruu
Member
178
11-02-2023, 04:54 PM
#7
Moved to PC Gaming *** Anno 1800 works well for most benchmarks I've noticed. Strategy titles mostly rely on CPU and RAM for decision-making. Because they're not highly optimized, adding a workstation CPU won't significantly improve performance.
E
Eneruu
11-02-2023, 04:54 PM #7

Moved to PC Gaming *** Anno 1800 works well for most benchmarks I've noticed. Strategy titles mostly rely on CPU and RAM for decision-making. Because they're not highly optimized, adding a workstation CPU won't significantly improve performance.