F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Why is PC so slow?

Why is PC so slow?

Why is PC so slow?

_
_Plup_
Junior Member
21
10-13-2016, 04:08 PM
#1
I own an Intel i7-5960x CPU with water cooling, overclocked to 1.3 core voltage and active core multiplier at 46, paired with two GTX-980 SC graphics, 32Gb DDR4 RAM (2800), all running on an MSI X99A Godlike Gaming motherboard. I also have a 1350W 80 Plus Silver power supply. Despite these specs, I'm only reaching 3.7 GHz instead of the expected 4.6 GHz. What's going on?
_
_Plup_
10-13-2016, 04:08 PM #1

I own an Intel i7-5960x CPU with water cooling, overclocked to 1.3 core voltage and active core multiplier at 46, paired with two GTX-980 SC graphics, 32Gb DDR4 RAM (2800), all running on an MSI X99A Godlike Gaming motherboard. I also have a 1350W 80 Plus Silver power supply. Despite these specs, I'm only reaching 3.7 GHz instead of the expected 4.6 GHz. What's going on?

T
TitooL
Member
117
10-25-2016, 02:53 AM
#2
Have you adjusted the settings through the BIOS? Is the display showing a speed of 3.7ghz?
T
TitooL
10-25-2016, 02:53 AM #2

Have you adjusted the settings through the BIOS? Is the display showing a speed of 3.7ghz?

I
183
11-02-2016, 12:09 AM
#3
It seems your 46 multiplier wasn't activated across every core. Would you like me to confirm that?
I
itz_Jesper2016
11-02-2016, 12:09 AM #3

It seems your 46 multiplier wasn't activated across every core. Would you like me to confirm that?

O
okagaca
Member
52
11-03-2016, 07:00 AM
#4
In BIOS it displays my clock speed and I am attempting to OC using Intel's latest XTU program. I've tried OC in my BIOS as well. Is there something in BIOS I need to "unlock/disable/turn off" to make these settings work? I'm focusing on core 1 so far.
O
okagaca
11-03-2016, 07:00 AM #4

In BIOS it displays my clock speed and I am attempting to OC using Intel's latest XTU program. I've tried OC in my BIOS as well. Is there something in BIOS I need to "unlock/disable/turn off" to make these settings work? I'm focusing on core 1 so far.

S
shadowgtr
Member
222
11-04-2016, 05:39 AM
#5
There are various multipliers depending on the number of loaded cores. I encountered a problem while recently updating my 3570K; even with a single thread running on Prime95, it appears Windows is splitting the workload across more than one core. This makes it difficult to properly test a single-core multiplier. It would be better to start with an all-core multiplier first, then adjust if you need a slight performance boost.
S
shadowgtr
11-04-2016, 05:39 AM #5

There are various multipliers depending on the number of loaded cores. I encountered a problem while recently updating my 3570K; even with a single thread running on Prime95, it appears Windows is splitting the workload across more than one core. This makes it difficult to properly test a single-core multiplier. It would be better to start with an all-core multiplier first, then adjust if you need a slight performance boost.

K
kcristan
Senior Member
514
11-11-2016, 09:48 PM
#6
Good suggestion. I adjusted all cores to 44, then increased the multiplier to 45 and 46, maintaining a voltage of 1.3v. Still no improvement. I've viewed various u-tube tutorials and read numerous articles about my i7-5960x and MSI X99A Godlike Gaming board. I'm still struggling to reach over 3.7GHz.
K
kcristan
11-11-2016, 09:48 PM #6

Good suggestion. I adjusted all cores to 44, then increased the multiplier to 45 and 46, maintaining a voltage of 1.3v. Still no improvement. I've viewed various u-tube tutorials and read numerous articles about my i7-5960x and MSI X99A Godlike Gaming board. I'm still struggling to reach over 3.7GHz.