F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Why does everyone dislike Windows 8?

Why does everyone dislike Windows 8?

Why does everyone dislike Windows 8?

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
R
rebelka79
Member
185
02-27-2016, 04:11 AM
#11
I explain why folks resist it—it's because it feels unfamiliar. Remember how Windows stayed largely the same for nearly two decades (from Windows 95 to 7)? That’s 15 years of familiarity. Now suddenly we’re introducing a major shift, and many accustomed users struggle to adapt. Everything in Windows 7 can be done more simply or efficiently in Windows 8. People are used to doing things the old way, so change feels disruptive.
R
rebelka79
02-27-2016, 04:11 AM #11

I explain why folks resist it—it's because it feels unfamiliar. Remember how Windows stayed largely the same for nearly two decades (from Windows 95 to 7)? That’s 15 years of familiarity. Now suddenly we’re introducing a major shift, and many accustomed users struggle to adapt. Everything in Windows 7 can be done more simply or efficiently in Windows 8. People are used to doing things the old way, so change feels disruptive.

I
ItsJeGirlRomy
Member
200
02-27-2016, 04:39 AM
#12
I'm currently on version 8.1, and I believe it won't work. The Microsoft site mentions incompatibility.
I
ItsJeGirlRomy
02-27-2016, 04:39 AM #12

I'm currently on version 8.1, and I believe it won't work. The Microsoft site mentions incompatibility.

T
tiggore
Member
50
02-27-2016, 05:54 PM
#13
I run on Windows 8.1 and I’m glad about it. It works much better for me than Windows 7, though that’s just my view.
T
tiggore
02-27-2016, 05:54 PM #13

I run on Windows 8.1 and I’m glad about it. It works much better for me than Windows 7, though that’s just my view.

D
DoctorRockem
Member
61
02-28-2016, 02:20 AM
#14
Let's simply refer to them as bandwagon critics.
D
DoctorRockem
02-28-2016, 02:20 AM #14

Let's simply refer to them as bandwagon critics.

A
A_Sound
Senior Member
486
03-06-2016, 07:42 AM
#15
I've faced numerous issues with Windows 8 (and still some in 8.1). The update process was problematic, often causing corruption and requiring reinstallation. I'm stuck in a repetitive restart cycle on a factory-setup laptop—how could they design that? Boot failures are frequent, and I rarely get a proper start-up or sleep cycle. My experience was really frustrating. Plus, I dislike the lack of centralized settings; changing the desktop theme or lock screen feels like a completely different menu in Metro. It's not just about Metro, but the overall lack of integration.
A
A_Sound
03-06-2016, 07:42 AM #15

I've faced numerous issues with Windows 8 (and still some in 8.1). The update process was problematic, often causing corruption and requiring reinstallation. I'm stuck in a repetitive restart cycle on a factory-setup laptop—how could they design that? Boot failures are frequent, and I rarely get a proper start-up or sleep cycle. My experience was really frustrating. Plus, I dislike the lack of centralized settings; changing the desktop theme or lock screen feels like a completely different menu in Metro. It's not just about Metro, but the overall lack of integration.

Z
Zam_GM
Member
158
03-18-2016, 02:13 PM
#16
Yeah, you're right about those small things, but they really matter a lot. I just stick everything in black or pink once it's done, so I don't have to worry about those issues much. One thing that bothers me is that Windows 10 feels like a completely different operating system. I get why it needs to be separate from the main line, but if it was just a simple update, it would work fine. Still, it looks like a solid 8.1 with a revamped start menu. Why isn't it fully released yet? It shouldn't be in that beta phase. Also, 10 better stick to free OSX and Linux instead of just Windows. If Microsoft wants to keep making money from Windows, they should offer both workstation and consumer versions—seriously, that would make more sense.
Z
Zam_GM
03-18-2016, 02:13 PM #16

Yeah, you're right about those small things, but they really matter a lot. I just stick everything in black or pink once it's done, so I don't have to worry about those issues much. One thing that bothers me is that Windows 10 feels like a completely different operating system. I get why it needs to be separate from the main line, but if it was just a simple update, it would work fine. Still, it looks like a solid 8.1 with a revamped start menu. Why isn't it fully released yet? It shouldn't be in that beta phase. Also, 10 better stick to free OSX and Linux instead of just Windows. If Microsoft wants to keep making money from Windows, they should offer both workstation and consumer versions—seriously, that would make more sense.

I
iron_finder1
Posting Freak
750
03-24-2016, 01:20 PM
#17
It took me a week or two to get used to it, but I usually stay on the desktop unless I have to look up something, which is fine. The Windows button plus typing your search is actually quicker than using the Start button.
I
iron_finder1
03-24-2016, 01:20 PM #17

It took me a week or two to get used to it, but I usually stay on the desktop unless I have to look up something, which is fine. The Windows button plus typing your search is actually quicker than using the Start button.

2
25daniel
Member
177
03-26-2016, 10:27 AM
#18
On desktop, Metro/Modern UI offers most features but lacks a start button and charms, relying mainly on the Metro design. Touch functionality is absent when using a mouse and keyboard, which would allow quicker interactions. Other aspects such as the detailed task manager, file transfer windows, and overall performance are strong. However, Microsoft's marketing of it as a "mobile" platform was unrealistic, assuming everyone would use touchscreens. Reverting to the classic shell/start menu and removing Metro for a desktop-only experience works well. On mobile devices like laptops or Surface, tapping can be useful when the touchpad is sluggish. Windows 10 should offer more flexible modes so users can choose features that suit them rather than being forced into one size fits all.
2
25daniel
03-26-2016, 10:27 AM #18

On desktop, Metro/Modern UI offers most features but lacks a start button and charms, relying mainly on the Metro design. Touch functionality is absent when using a mouse and keyboard, which would allow quicker interactions. Other aspects such as the detailed task manager, file transfer windows, and overall performance are strong. However, Microsoft's marketing of it as a "mobile" platform was unrealistic, assuming everyone would use touchscreens. Reverting to the classic shell/start menu and removing Metro for a desktop-only experience works well. On mobile devices like laptops or Surface, tapping can be useful when the touchpad is sluggish. Windows 10 should offer more flexible modes so users can choose features that suit them rather than being forced into one size fits all.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2