F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Why are the games becoming increasingly challenging while graphics remain unchanged?

Why are the games becoming increasingly challenging while graphics remain unchanged?

Why are the games becoming increasingly challenging while graphics remain unchanged?

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
B
beichner
Senior Member
447
01-06-2025, 01:30 PM
#1
the games are becoming increasingly challenging while graphical enhancements remain stagnant.
B
beichner
01-06-2025, 01:30 PM #1

the games are becoming increasingly challenging while graphical enhancements remain stagnant.

W
wumbo_cow
Junior Member
27
01-06-2025, 02:29 PM
#2
Which games and in relation to what?
W
wumbo_cow
01-06-2025, 02:29 PM #2

Which games and in relation to what?

H
216
01-06-2025, 04:25 PM
#3
The comparison between Assassins Creed Odyssey and Ac Mirrage Graphics appears identical.
H
HauntingShadow
01-06-2025, 04:25 PM #3

The comparison between Assassins Creed Odyssey and Ac Mirrage Graphics appears identical.

Z
Zerpenn
Member
63
01-06-2025, 06:12 PM
#4
They're alike thematically and in art direction, but Mirage offers greater detail (geometry and textures), a more sophisticated rendering system, increased world density, and higher minimum specs for Odyssey at 720P/30 compared to Mirage's 1080P/30 (about two and a half times more pixels).
Z
Zerpenn
01-06-2025, 06:12 PM #4

They're alike thematically and in art direction, but Mirage offers greater detail (geometry and textures), a more sophisticated rendering system, increased world density, and higher minimum specs for Odyssey at 720P/30 compared to Mirage's 1080P/30 (about two and a half times more pixels).

H
Hannibal_2004
Member
59
01-08-2025, 05:20 PM
#5
Those would be valid points if the game wasn’t very dull in terms of its environments. It’s something that has been mentioned in reviews, and after watching some footage, I have to agree. The story and characters are also pretty uninteresting. The only aspect that seemed appealing was the combat moves, but that isn’t enough to make a game engaging.

AC has been overused. Currently, Avatar Frontiers of Pandora and the upcoming Star Wars Outlaws, both from Massive Entertainment, seem to be Ubisoft’s top offerings. I’d rather they hadn’t stopped Splinter Cell, but at least they’re releasing some decent content. They should also revive Watch Dogs with a more serious approach and tackle the lighter elements.
H
Hannibal_2004
01-08-2025, 05:20 PM #5

Those would be valid points if the game wasn’t very dull in terms of its environments. It’s something that has been mentioned in reviews, and after watching some footage, I have to agree. The story and characters are also pretty uninteresting. The only aspect that seemed appealing was the combat moves, but that isn’t enough to make a game engaging.

AC has been overused. Currently, Avatar Frontiers of Pandora and the upcoming Star Wars Outlaws, both from Massive Entertainment, seem to be Ubisoft’s top offerings. I’d rather they hadn’t stopped Splinter Cell, but at least they’re releasing some decent content. They should also revive Watch Dogs with a more serious approach and tackle the lighter elements.

E
EduPllayson
Junior Member
40
01-10-2025, 03:12 AM
#6
It's similar to claiming the Blu-ray edition of High School Musical 3 is superior to the DVD version simply because it's a sequel to a poor film; both formats could be unappealing, but in terms of visual quality, the former still stands out objectively better. The question about system requirements for Mirage versus Odyssey arose when they appeared identical, and I noted that while they seem alike on the surface, Mirage actually offers several measurable technical advantages. I made it clear that neither version was particularly engaging or well-made, which is a different matter entirely.
E
EduPllayson
01-10-2025, 03:12 AM #6

It's similar to claiming the Blu-ray edition of High School Musical 3 is superior to the DVD version simply because it's a sequel to a poor film; both formats could be unappealing, but in terms of visual quality, the former still stands out objectively better. The question about system requirements for Mirage versus Odyssey arose when they appeared identical, and I noted that while they seem alike on the surface, Mirage actually offers several measurable technical advantages. I made it clear that neither version was particularly engaging or well-made, which is a different matter entirely.

M
Megalopool
Junior Member
10
01-10-2025, 06:14 AM
#7
Decreasing benefits.
The updated version demands more from rendering, yet the visual enhancements are minor and hardly perceptible.
The boost in resolution alone will significantly raise the needs. The question of whether it appears improved remains unclear.
M
Megalopool
01-10-2025, 06:14 AM #7

Decreasing benefits.
The updated version demands more from rendering, yet the visual enhancements are minor and hardly perceptible.
The boost in resolution alone will significantly raise the needs. The question of whether it appears improved remains unclear.

B
Bibble_Ele
Senior Member
447
01-16-2025, 10:53 PM
#8
Yeah, sorry, I think we veered off the subject, and you're correct. What I was trying to say is that those graphical enhancements are mostly wasted on a game that looks quite plain. Avatar Frontiers of Pandora, however, demonstrates how well the high-tech graphics are utilized. Mirage, by contrast, feels very similar to Revelations, another game with a rather generic appearance. Ubi has made several poor choices with their titles, but Massive's recent releases seem to finally align more closely with what players expect. So my comment wasn't about Ubi's efforts to improve, given the limitations of Mirage's design.
B
Bibble_Ele
01-16-2025, 10:53 PM #8

Yeah, sorry, I think we veered off the subject, and you're correct. What I was trying to say is that those graphical enhancements are mostly wasted on a game that looks quite plain. Avatar Frontiers of Pandora, however, demonstrates how well the high-tech graphics are utilized. Mirage, by contrast, feels very similar to Revelations, another game with a rather generic appearance. Ubi has made several poor choices with their titles, but Massive's recent releases seem to finally align more closely with what players expect. So my comment wasn't about Ubi's efforts to improve, given the limitations of Mirage's design.

S
Sashle
Junior Member
45
01-18-2025, 08:13 AM
#9
Although many games have similar environments, this overlooks significant costly enhancements made behind the scenes that heavily strain GPU power. For instance, techniques such as light diffusion provide only slight visual gains in most cases, yet require immense processing. Consequently, there’s almost no noticeable boost in overall quality, even though the effort continues when the feature is activated.
S
Sashle
01-18-2025, 08:13 AM #9

Although many games have similar environments, this overlooks significant costly enhancements made behind the scenes that heavily strain GPU power. For instance, techniques such as light diffusion provide only slight visual gains in most cases, yet require immense processing. Consequently, there’s almost no noticeable boost in overall quality, even though the effort continues when the feature is activated.

S
SuperTigresss
Posting Freak
768
01-22-2025, 02:12 AM
#10
I understand the concept of diminishing returns. Achieving a quality that resembles photo realism at 90% is progressively more challenging, demanding increasingly complex path tracing and full physics simulations for accurate outcomes. This is why Nvidia invests heavily in ray tracing—it truly offers the most straightforward route to enhancing realism.

I find myself frequently drawn away by games that aim for visual appeal but fall short. I favor stylized visuals over strict realism, as I feel less immersed when expectations aren't met. That's why realistic facial animations matter a lot to me; anything that seems forced or off-putting disrupts the experience.

The relentless push for higher visual fidelity can actually harm the gaming sector. Developers often allocate vast time and resources to creating high-poly models and textures, or to hiring celebrities for face capture, alongside costly microtransactions. Gameplay is frequently sidelined in favor of these visual priorities.
S
SuperTigresss
01-22-2025, 02:12 AM #10

I understand the concept of diminishing returns. Achieving a quality that resembles photo realism at 90% is progressively more challenging, demanding increasingly complex path tracing and full physics simulations for accurate outcomes. This is why Nvidia invests heavily in ray tracing—it truly offers the most straightforward route to enhancing realism.

I find myself frequently drawn away by games that aim for visual appeal but fall short. I favor stylized visuals over strict realism, as I feel less immersed when expectations aren't met. That's why realistic facial animations matter a lot to me; anything that seems forced or off-putting disrupts the experience.

The relentless push for higher visual fidelity can actually harm the gaming sector. Developers often allocate vast time and resources to creating high-poly models and textures, or to hiring celebrities for face capture, alongside costly microtransactions. Gameplay is frequently sidelined in favor of these visual priorities.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next