F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Which overclocking setup works best for the i7-6700k with H100i?

Which overclocking setup works best for the i7-6700k with H100i?

Which overclocking setup works best for the i7-6700k with H100i?

D
Deneth_
Member
175
07-13-2016, 09:15 PM
#1
I was interested in understanding the boundaries of my overclocking for the i7-6700k. Usually I keep it at around 4.6ghz, but I want to find out how much higher I can push it. Here are my system details:
D
Deneth_
07-13-2016, 09:15 PM #1

I was interested in understanding the boundaries of my overclocking for the i7-6700k. Usually I keep it at around 4.6ghz, but I want to find out how much higher I can push it. Here are my system details:

P
PowerMaxx
Member
221
07-13-2016, 09:54 PM
#2
I've reached a stable 4.8Ghz, though it came with a high voltage that I don't want to use often. The cooler performs well for overclocking, maintaining my CPU temperature as effectively as any other cooler except a custom loop. I've set it to 4.6Ghz @1.29V and during full load, I've stayed under 55°C after more than three hours of gaming or benchmarking.
P
PowerMaxx
07-13-2016, 09:54 PM #2

I've reached a stable 4.8Ghz, though it came with a high voltage that I don't want to use often. The cooler performs well for overclocking, maintaining my CPU temperature as effectively as any other cooler except a custom loop. I've set it to 4.6Ghz @1.29V and during full load, I've stayed under 55°C after more than three hours of gaming or benchmarking.

T
Turquose
Member
198
07-24-2016, 11:52 PM
#3
Refer to the instructions provided in the article about Intel Skylake i7-6700K overclocking.
T
Turquose
07-24-2016, 11:52 PM #3

Refer to the instructions provided in the article about Intel Skylake i7-6700K overclocking.

T
TimdR152
Junior Member
6
07-25-2016, 07:01 AM
#4
I've reached a stable 4.8Ghz, though it came with a high voltage that I don't want to use often. The cooler performs well for overclocking, maintaining my CPU temperature as effectively as any other cooler except a custom loop. I've set it to 4.6Ghz @1.29V and during full load, I've stayed under 55°C after more than three hours of gaming or benchmarking.
T
TimdR152
07-25-2016, 07:01 AM #4

I've reached a stable 4.8Ghz, though it came with a high voltage that I don't want to use often. The cooler performs well for overclocking, maintaining my CPU temperature as effectively as any other cooler except a custom loop. I've set it to 4.6Ghz @1.29V and during full load, I've stayed under 55°C after more than three hours of gaming or benchmarking.

K
kaaskotskikker
Posting Freak
795
07-27-2016, 06:31 AM
#5
I've reached a stable 4.8Ghz, but it required high voltage that I don't want to use often. The cooler works well for overclocking and keeps my CPU cool like any other good cooler except a custom loop. I'm set at 4.6Ghz @1.29V and during full load and more than 3 hours of gaming/benefiting tests, I never exceed 55°C. I think I got a decent bin pick since the firefight benchmark didn't crash and only drew 1.248V—other programs besides Prime95 (which I'm avoiding due to recent problems) could I try for stability testing?
K
kaaskotskikker
07-27-2016, 06:31 AM #5

I've reached a stable 4.8Ghz, but it required high voltage that I don't want to use often. The cooler works well for overclocking and keeps my CPU cool like any other good cooler except a custom loop. I'm set at 4.6Ghz @1.29V and during full load and more than 3 hours of gaming/benefiting tests, I never exceed 55°C. I think I got a decent bin pick since the firefight benchmark didn't crash and only drew 1.248V—other programs besides Prime95 (which I'm avoiding due to recent problems) could I try for stability testing?

J
jwjamesking
Junior Member
11
07-28-2016, 02:15 PM
#6
Avoid using Firestrike for CPU benchmarking—it's a GPU-focused tool. I rely on Realbench, keeping it active for roughly 30 minutes each session. Firestrike performs CPU physics tests, but it doesn't provide the same level of genuine CPU stress testing.
J
jwjamesking
07-28-2016, 02:15 PM #6

Avoid using Firestrike for CPU benchmarking—it's a GPU-focused tool. I rely on Realbench, keeping it active for roughly 30 minutes each session. Firestrike performs CPU physics tests, but it doesn't provide the same level of genuine CPU stress testing.

Y
youginger
Junior Member
38
07-28-2016, 02:41 PM
#7
Gamer1985 :
Don't rely on Firestrike for CPU benchmarking—it's better suited for GPU testing. I prefer Realbench and let it run for around 30 minutes each session. Firestrike focuses on GPU performance rather than simulating a true CPU stress test.

Yeah, Firestrike is ideal for GPU benchmarks, not for putting the CPU under real stress. You might want to try Intel Burn Test instead:
http://www.majorgeeks.com/files/details/...ntest.html
Y
youginger
07-28-2016, 02:41 PM #7

Gamer1985 :
Don't rely on Firestrike for CPU benchmarking—it's better suited for GPU testing. I prefer Realbench and let it run for around 30 minutes each session. Firestrike focuses on GPU performance rather than simulating a true CPU stress test.

Yeah, Firestrike is ideal for GPU benchmarks, not for putting the CPU under real stress. You might want to try Intel Burn Test instead:
http://www.majorgeeks.com/files/details/...ntest.html