F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Which combination would perform better?

Which combination would perform better?

Which combination would perform better?

G
Galinaceo
Junior Member
4
11-28-2025, 01:48 AM
#1
I mentioned in an earlier post that I work as a content creator and use my PC for personal projects too. I don’t always need a top-tier setup, but a solid CPU and RAM are really important for my rendering/video software. Still, I’m also a gamer and will be playing games at 1440p/2k. Today I found some better deals, so here are the options. Basically, I’m looking for which option offers the best value and performance, especially since the combos differ by around a hundred dollars. For reference, I can get these combos:

1) 9950x3d + 9070 xt $2649
2) 14900kf + 5070 ti $2499

Which one should I choose? My thought is the first combo seems more suitable for my needs at 2k/1440p. Please share your thoughts and don’t forget to vote, thanks in advance.
G
Galinaceo
11-28-2025, 01:48 AM #1

I mentioned in an earlier post that I work as a content creator and use my PC for personal projects too. I don’t always need a top-tier setup, but a solid CPU and RAM are really important for my rendering/video software. Still, I’m also a gamer and will be playing games at 1440p/2k. Today I found some better deals, so here are the options. Basically, I’m looking for which option offers the best value and performance, especially since the combos differ by around a hundred dollars. For reference, I can get these combos:

1) 9950x3d + 9070 xt $2649
2) 14900kf + 5070 ti $2499

Which one should I choose? My thought is the first combo seems more suitable for my needs at 2k/1440p. Please share your thoughts and don’t forget to vote, thanks in advance.

P
Pronightwolve
Junior Member
15
11-28-2025, 04:36 AM
#2
The AMD option offers better value for the performance received.
P
Pronightwolve
11-28-2025, 04:36 AM #2

The AMD option offers better value for the performance received.

M
MooMoo2011
Senior Member
690
11-28-2025, 05:50 AM
#3
Even with an additional $150, it would still make a difference.
M
MooMoo2011
11-28-2025, 05:50 AM #3

Even with an additional $150, it would still make a difference.

K
KARLEISHAK
Member
197
11-28-2025, 06:11 AM
#4
I support the i9-14900K + 5070ti choice.
For gaming tasks, X3D processors perform well. However, for multithreaded applications the 14900k offers better performance.
The 5070ti could also be more capable, especially for higher resolutions.
Additionally, this combination provides better value.
Check the reviews of ultra 265/285 processors for more insights.
K
KARLEISHAK
11-28-2025, 06:11 AM #4

I support the i9-14900K + 5070ti choice.
For gaming tasks, X3D processors perform well. However, for multithreaded applications the 14900k offers better performance.
The 5070ti could also be more capable, especially for higher resolutions.
Additionally, this combination provides better value.
Check the reviews of ultra 265/285 processors for more insights.

Q
quadlaser
Member
95
11-28-2025, 11:29 AM
#5
Sure, I reviewed other possibilities and decided to use a pre-built system with a solid warranty. For now, I'll handle most of my video editing and rendering on this PC, balancing it with gaming through a 2k/1440p display.
Q
quadlaser
11-28-2025, 11:29 AM #5

Sure, I reviewed other possibilities and decided to use a pre-built system with a solid warranty. For now, I'll handle most of my video editing and rendering on this PC, balancing it with gaming through a 2k/1440p display.

D
Disco_Master
Member
163
11-28-2025, 12:10 PM
#6
14900k get beaten by 9950x3d. Even 14900ks without enabling Intel Default Setting can only get 40000-41000 without overclocking, but 9950x3d can easily get 42000, only consuming 220watts.
After an auto-undervolting it can reach 46000 in safe mode of Windows, while nobody dare to overclock an 13/14th CPU due to its former instability issue. After enabling Intel Default Setting, it can only get 38000, 10% behind 9950x.
285k should be in trash bin due to its price(even higher than 9950x), but 265k is extremely wonderful, as it's only 1999$ in my area, while 9950x is 3999$ and 285k is 4399$. I don't know if 265k's price has been reduced by 35% in other regions, if so, it's a great deal.
D
Disco_Master
11-28-2025, 12:10 PM #6

14900k get beaten by 9950x3d. Even 14900ks without enabling Intel Default Setting can only get 40000-41000 without overclocking, but 9950x3d can easily get 42000, only consuming 220watts.
After an auto-undervolting it can reach 46000 in safe mode of Windows, while nobody dare to overclock an 13/14th CPU due to its former instability issue. After enabling Intel Default Setting, it can only get 38000, 10% behind 9950x.
285k should be in trash bin due to its price(even higher than 9950x), but 265k is extremely wonderful, as it's only 1999$ in my area, while 9950x is 3999$ and 285k is 4399$. I don't know if 265k's price has been reduced by 35% in other regions, if so, it's a great deal.