F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking When operating below temperature limits, there isn't necessarily a need to push overclocking to its maximum.

When operating below temperature limits, there isn't necessarily a need to push overclocking to its maximum.

When operating below temperature limits, there isn't necessarily a need to push overclocking to its maximum.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
B
bulbasaurb6
Junior Member
48
02-28-2016, 08:10 PM
#1
About me: I'm 45 years old, a professional who hasn't delved deeply into computer internals. When I started learning out of curiosity, I focused on DOS and floppy drives. By chance, I decided to try overclocking and had a lot of fun figuring it out. But I have a question...
B
bulbasaurb6
02-28-2016, 08:10 PM #1

About me: I'm 45 years old, a professional who hasn't delved deeply into computer internals. When I started learning out of curiosity, I focused on DOS and floppy drives. By chance, I decided to try overclocking and had a lot of fun figuring it out. But I have a question...

L
Lorddoom139
Posting Freak
956
03-09-2016, 05:41 PM
#2
No, you shouldn't. I'm really surprised you managed to get what you did on that motherboard. It doesn't even have heatsinks on the VRMs, and while your CPU might be within spec, your VRM temperature is likely right at 100%—probably the main reason for your instability.

This board isn't very high quality, whether it's new or worn out. If you're planning to overclock, which I completely understand, even though you probably won't gain much from it, I'd recommend looking for a better one.
L
Lorddoom139
03-09-2016, 05:41 PM #2

No, you shouldn't. I'm really surprised you managed to get what you did on that motherboard. It doesn't even have heatsinks on the VRMs, and while your CPU might be within spec, your VRM temperature is likely right at 100%—probably the main reason for your instability.

This board isn't very high quality, whether it's new or worn out. If you're planning to overclock, which I completely understand, even though you probably won't gain much from it, I'd recommend looking for a better one.

R
RoyalShine
Member
143
03-18-2016, 03:44 AM
#3
I don't recall damaging the voltage on the bulldozer, but eventually it could begin affecting the chip.
R
RoyalShine
03-18-2016, 03:44 AM #3

I don't recall damaging the voltage on the bulldozer, but eventually it could begin affecting the chip.

P
Pionse
Junior Member
15
04-08-2016, 07:57 AM
#4
No, you shouldn't. I'm really taken aback by how you managed to get what you have on that motherboard. This board lacks heatsinks on the VRMs, and even though your CPU temperature might be within limits, your VRM temperature is likely right at the maximum allowed, which is probably where your instability originates.

This isn't a top-tier build, either when it was new or now with some time passed. If you're planning to overclock—which I completely understand—I’d rather look for a better board.

Make sure you check that any models you consider have chipsets 990fx, 990, or 970. For instance, the Z170 Extreme6 won't work with your FX processor, so you should aim for the 990/990fx Extreme6 instead.
P
Pionse
04-08-2016, 07:57 AM #4

No, you shouldn't. I'm really taken aback by how you managed to get what you have on that motherboard. This board lacks heatsinks on the VRMs, and even though your CPU temperature might be within limits, your VRM temperature is likely right at the maximum allowed, which is probably where your instability originates.

This isn't a top-tier build, either when it was new or now with some time passed. If you're planning to overclock—which I completely understand—I’d rather look for a better board.

Make sure you check that any models you consider have chipsets 990fx, 990, or 970. For instance, the Z170 Extreme6 won't work with your FX processor, so you should aim for the 990/990fx Extreme6 instead.

C
163
04-08-2016, 07:12 PM
#5
I don't recall any voltage issues on the bulldozer, but at some point the voltage began damaging the chip.
FX-6300 is a Piledriver, not a Bulldozer.
C
Cookie0verDose
04-08-2016, 07:12 PM #5

I don't recall any voltage issues on the bulldozer, but at some point the voltage began damaging the chip.
FX-6300 is a Piledriver, not a Bulldozer.

A
Aurorax_
Member
63
04-08-2016, 08:22 PM
#6
Yeah, sure they had the same safe voltage. It's been a while since I've had an am3 and I'm not as familiar with it anymore.
A
Aurorax_
04-08-2016, 08:22 PM #6

Yeah, sure they had the same safe voltage. It's been a while since I've had an am3 and I'm not as familiar with it anymore.

E
Ender_kat22
Member
171
04-09-2016, 12:50 PM
#7
That's not stable.
E
Ender_kat22
04-09-2016, 12:50 PM #7

That's not stable.

A
AllMightyPeco
Junior Member
23
04-09-2016, 04:20 PM
#8
Thank you for the details. For others facing similar issues, I've chosen 4.1 Mhz and 1.272v, which has operated stably for nearly three hours at a peak of 52°C. I plan to continue for another hour or two to confirm.
@darkbreeze: I'm not familiar with VRM. If the HWMonitor doesn't mention it, I don't know. At 4.1Mhz, CPU: Max 53c, Mainboard 34c, AMD FX-6300 Package:44c, Assembly, Air flow, and SSD airflow: 38c, GPU:41c. Appreciate your assistance and advice.
A
AllMightyPeco
04-09-2016, 04:20 PM #8

Thank you for the details. For others facing similar issues, I've chosen 4.1 Mhz and 1.272v, which has operated stably for nearly three hours at a peak of 52°C. I plan to continue for another hour or two to confirm.
@darkbreeze: I'm not familiar with VRM. If the HWMonitor doesn't mention it, I don't know. At 4.1Mhz, CPU: Max 53c, Mainboard 34c, AMD FX-6300 Package:44c, Assembly, Air flow, and SSD airflow: 38c, GPU:41c. Appreciate your assistance and advice.

D
demstur
Junior Member
35
04-09-2016, 04:44 PM
#9
There are no sensors on the vrms; they provide the power for the cpu socket. Many am3 boards, particularly those with 8*** chips, tend to overheat and reduce cpu performance to prevent damage. If you push too hard with that OC setting, you might encounter issues, but it seems you've reached 4.1 already.
D
demstur
04-09-2016, 04:44 PM #9

There are no sensors on the vrms; they provide the power for the cpu socket. Many am3 boards, particularly those with 8*** chips, tend to overheat and reduce cpu performance to prevent damage. If you push too hard with that OC setting, you might encounter issues, but it seems you've reached 4.1 already.

D
Doctor_Pi
Member
214
04-15-2016, 11:59 AM
#10
VRMs:
https://www.gamersnexus.net/guides/1229-...?showall=1
Actually, a LOT of boards DO have some kind of thermal monitoring for the VRMs if you use HWinfo and look at some of the motherboard thermal sensors. I can't tell you for that board specifically if it will or not, and it probably doesn't matter because with ANY overclock above the maximum stock turbo speed it's likely to be a problem anyhow.
As for the stability, USAFRet is 100% correct. That's not even, nor is 3 hours, anywhere NEAR to establishing stability and you're probably not running the correct software to validate stability anyhow. Here is the quick and dirty version:
Quick and dirty overview of overclocking validation procedure.
Set CPU multiplier and voltage at desired settings in BIOS. Do not use presets or automatic utilities. These will overcompensate on core and other voltages. It is much better to configure most core settings manually, and leave anything left over on auto until a later point in time if wish to come back and tweak settings such as cache (Uncore) frequency, System agent voltage, VCCIO (Internal memory controller) and memory speeds or timings (RAM) AFTER the CPU overclock is fully stable.
Save bios settings (As a new BIOS profile if your bios supports multiple profiles) and exit bios.
Boot into the Windows desktop environment. Download and install Prime95 version 26.6.
Download and install either HWinfo or CoreTemp.
Open HWinfo and run "Sensors only" or open CoreTemp.
Run Prime95 (ONLY version 26.6) and choose the "Small FFT test option". Run this for 15 minutes while monitoring your core/package temperatures to verify that you do not exceed the thermal specifications of your CPU.
(This should be considered to be 80°C for most generations of Intel processor and for current Ryzen CPUs. For older AMD FX and Phenom series, you should use a thermal monitor that has options for "Distance to TJmax" and you want to NOT see distance to TJmax drop below 10°C distance to TJmax. Anything that is MORE than 10°C distance to TJmax is within the allowed thermal envelope.)
If your CPU passes the thermal compliance test, move on to stability.
Download and install Realbench. Run Realbench and choose the Stress test option. Choose a value from the available memory (RAM) options that is equal to approximately half of your installed memory capacity. If you have 16GB, choose 8GB. If you have 8GB, choose 4GB, etc. Click start and allow the stability test to run for 8 hours. Do not plan to use the system for ANYTHING else while it is running. It will run realistic AVX and handbrake workloads and if it passes 8 hours of testing it is probably about as stable as you can reasonably expect.
If you wish to check stability further you can run 12-24 hours of Prime95 Blend mode or Small FFT.
You do not need to simultaneously run HWinfo or CoreTemp while running Realbench as you should have already performed the thermal compliance test PLUS Realbench will show current CPU temperatures while it is running.
If you run the additional stability test using Prime95 Blend/Small FFT modes for 12-24 hours, you will WANT to also run HWinfo alongside it. Monitor HWinfo periodically to verify that no cores/threads are showing less than 100% usage. If it is, then that worker has errored out and the test should be stopped.
If you find there are errors on ANY of the stability tests including Realbench or Prime95, or any other stress testing utility, you need to make a change in the bios. This could be either dropping the multiplier to a lower factor or increasing the voltage while leaving the multiplier the same. If you change voltage or multiplier at ANY time, you need to start over again at the beginning and verify thermal compliance again.
A more in depth but general guide that is still intended for beginners or those who have had a small amount of experience overclocking can be found here:
*CPU overclocking guide for beginners
D
Doctor_Pi
04-15-2016, 11:59 AM #10

VRMs:
https://www.gamersnexus.net/guides/1229-...?showall=1
Actually, a LOT of boards DO have some kind of thermal monitoring for the VRMs if you use HWinfo and look at some of the motherboard thermal sensors. I can't tell you for that board specifically if it will or not, and it probably doesn't matter because with ANY overclock above the maximum stock turbo speed it's likely to be a problem anyhow.
As for the stability, USAFRet is 100% correct. That's not even, nor is 3 hours, anywhere NEAR to establishing stability and you're probably not running the correct software to validate stability anyhow. Here is the quick and dirty version:
Quick and dirty overview of overclocking validation procedure.
Set CPU multiplier and voltage at desired settings in BIOS. Do not use presets or automatic utilities. These will overcompensate on core and other voltages. It is much better to configure most core settings manually, and leave anything left over on auto until a later point in time if wish to come back and tweak settings such as cache (Uncore) frequency, System agent voltage, VCCIO (Internal memory controller) and memory speeds or timings (RAM) AFTER the CPU overclock is fully stable.
Save bios settings (As a new BIOS profile if your bios supports multiple profiles) and exit bios.
Boot into the Windows desktop environment. Download and install Prime95 version 26.6.
Download and install either HWinfo or CoreTemp.
Open HWinfo and run "Sensors only" or open CoreTemp.
Run Prime95 (ONLY version 26.6) and choose the "Small FFT test option". Run this for 15 minutes while monitoring your core/package temperatures to verify that you do not exceed the thermal specifications of your CPU.
(This should be considered to be 80°C for most generations of Intel processor and for current Ryzen CPUs. For older AMD FX and Phenom series, you should use a thermal monitor that has options for "Distance to TJmax" and you want to NOT see distance to TJmax drop below 10°C distance to TJmax. Anything that is MORE than 10°C distance to TJmax is within the allowed thermal envelope.)
If your CPU passes the thermal compliance test, move on to stability.
Download and install Realbench. Run Realbench and choose the Stress test option. Choose a value from the available memory (RAM) options that is equal to approximately half of your installed memory capacity. If you have 16GB, choose 8GB. If you have 8GB, choose 4GB, etc. Click start and allow the stability test to run for 8 hours. Do not plan to use the system for ANYTHING else while it is running. It will run realistic AVX and handbrake workloads and if it passes 8 hours of testing it is probably about as stable as you can reasonably expect.
If you wish to check stability further you can run 12-24 hours of Prime95 Blend mode or Small FFT.
You do not need to simultaneously run HWinfo or CoreTemp while running Realbench as you should have already performed the thermal compliance test PLUS Realbench will show current CPU temperatures while it is running.
If you run the additional stability test using Prime95 Blend/Small FFT modes for 12-24 hours, you will WANT to also run HWinfo alongside it. Monitor HWinfo periodically to verify that no cores/threads are showing less than 100% usage. If it is, then that worker has errored out and the test should be stopped.
If you find there are errors on ANY of the stability tests including Realbench or Prime95, or any other stress testing utility, you need to make a change in the bios. This could be either dropping the multiplier to a lower factor or increasing the voltage while leaving the multiplier the same. If you change voltage or multiplier at ANY time, you need to start over again at the beginning and verify thermal compliance again.
A more in depth but general guide that is still intended for beginners or those who have had a small amount of experience overclocking can be found here:
*CPU overclocking guide for beginners

Pages (2): 1 2 Next