F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking whats your i7 6700k overclock.

whats your i7 6700k overclock.

whats your i7 6700k overclock.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
M
MrStriker4013
Junior Member
37
11-15-2016, 05:44 PM
#11
The outcomes are recorded in my notes. No sign of an optimized overclock, though. It was mostly just experimenting and turned out fully reliable. I didn’t feel the urge to push it further. What are your BIOS settings then?
M
MrStriker4013
11-15-2016, 05:44 PM #11

The outcomes are recorded in my notes. No sign of an optimized overclock, though. It was mostly just experimenting and turned out fully reliable. I didn’t feel the urge to push it further. What are your BIOS settings then?

I
Ice3Boy
Member
230
11-16-2016, 11:09 AM
#12
LLC remains strong on my Z170X UD5. BIOS voltage is locked at 1.32v, but it stays dynamic. It's consistently stable since I assembled it in February. I ran tests with Prime small FFts and Intel Burn Test simultaneously for eight hours. Temperatures stayed under 70°C on each core, except during both stability programs running together—those are continuous settings, not just a one-time check.

Yes, 1.25v on VCCSA and 1.15v on VCCIO with XMP enabled. Each board will behave differently.
I
Ice3Boy
11-16-2016, 11:09 AM #12

LLC remains strong on my Z170X UD5. BIOS voltage is locked at 1.32v, but it stays dynamic. It's consistently stable since I assembled it in February. I ran tests with Prime small FFts and Intel Burn Test simultaneously for eight hours. Temperatures stayed under 70°C on each core, except during both stability programs running together—those are continuous settings, not just a one-time check.

Yes, 1.25v on VCCSA and 1.15v on VCCIO with XMP enabled. Each board will behave differently.

G
Golpaus
Junior Member
31
11-29-2016, 04:25 PM
#13
Mastergup shared their experience with an i7 6700K and 4.8GHz overclock, noting high temperatures. They compared it to Salazar Studios' setup with a 4.4GHz version at 94°C. They are considering lower temps for better stability.
G
Golpaus
11-29-2016, 04:25 PM #13

Mastergup shared their experience with an i7 6700K and 4.8GHz overclock, noting high temperatures. They compared it to Salazar Studios' setup with a 4.4GHz version at 94°C. They are considering lower temps for better stability.

M
MeGustaElSexo
Member
173
12-06-2016, 08:29 PM
#14
kristoffermilo:
mastergup :
kristoffermilo shared his experience with the i7 6700K and 4.8GHz setup, noting high temperatures around 88-90°C during peak load. He mentioned seeing another build with similar specs running cooler at 94°C but decided to try a lower voltage of 1.34V with 4.5GHz and 65-70°C temps. He clarified his confusion about the temperature drop after improving the thermal paste application.
M
MeGustaElSexo
12-06-2016, 08:29 PM #14

kristoffermilo:
mastergup :
kristoffermilo shared his experience with the i7 6700K and 4.8GHz setup, noting high temperatures around 88-90°C during peak load. He mentioned seeing another build with similar specs running cooler at 94°C but decided to try a lower voltage of 1.34V with 4.5GHz and 65-70°C temps. He clarified his confusion about the temperature drop after improving the thermal paste application.

_
_klearix_
Member
204
12-07-2016, 12:20 AM
#15
When I installed my i7 6700K, I chose the 4.8GHz model regardless of the voltage. I ended up with around 1.41V and temperatures reached between 88-90°C during heavy use. However, I noticed Salazar Studios using an i7 5820K at a 4.4GHz overclock with temperatures at 94°C. Now I’m considering that staying under 90°C is safe.

But after all that,
Mod edit: you too,
I realized I didn’t apply enough thermal paste and used a new one, which has brought my temps down to 65-70°C on a 4.5GHz processor at 1.34V. I’m thinking about going back to the 4.8GHz again, since it should be cooler.

Apologies for the poor grammar in my earlier message...
How can your temperatures be lower when you require more voltage?
I don’t fully grasp what you’re suggesting, sorry.
@mastergup
Kristoffermilo meant his temps would be lower than before because he re-applied thermal paste; he mentioned having too little the first time. Correct! 😀
_
_klearix_
12-07-2016, 12:20 AM #15

When I installed my i7 6700K, I chose the 4.8GHz model regardless of the voltage. I ended up with around 1.41V and temperatures reached between 88-90°C during heavy use. However, I noticed Salazar Studios using an i7 5820K at a 4.4GHz overclock with temperatures at 94°C. Now I’m considering that staying under 90°C is safe.

But after all that,
Mod edit: you too,
I realized I didn’t apply enough thermal paste and used a new one, which has brought my temps down to 65-70°C on a 4.5GHz processor at 1.34V. I’m thinking about going back to the 4.8GHz again, since it should be cooler.

Apologies for the poor grammar in my earlier message...
How can your temperatures be lower when you require more voltage?
I don’t fully grasp what you’re suggesting, sorry.
@mastergup
Kristoffermilo meant his temps would be lower than before because he re-applied thermal paste; he mentioned having too little the first time. Correct! 😀

Pages (2): Previous 1 2