F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming What’s causing the performance issues with Battlefield 1 running on my computer?

What’s causing the performance issues with Battlefield 1 running on my computer?

What’s causing the performance issues with Battlefield 1 running on my computer?

W
WSWdog
Member
65
10-17-2016, 12:22 AM
#1
Based on the suggested hardware details, everything except the memory is satisfactory. The specifications call for 16 gigabytes of RAM, without specifying a particular type like DDR3 or DDR4. I currently possess 8 gigabytes of DDR3 memory, and I'm questioning whether this is contributing to the problem. A colleague can smoothly play Battlefield 1 at a frame rate of 144 with my identical graphics card and a significantly more powerful processor (possibly another factor as well), while I struggle to reach 60 frames per second during intense combat scenes on low settings. Do you have any suggestions? Here are my system details:
AMD FX-8350
MSI GTX 970 4gb OC
8gb ddr3 unspecified RAM (manufacturer unknown)
I have space for improvements, and I’m seeking guidance on whether to add an additional 8 gigabytes of DDR3 memory or replace the motherboard completely with a newer Intel processor and 16 gigabytes of DDR4 RAM. Thank you!
W
WSWdog
10-17-2016, 12:22 AM #1

Based on the suggested hardware details, everything except the memory is satisfactory. The specifications call for 16 gigabytes of RAM, without specifying a particular type like DDR3 or DDR4. I currently possess 8 gigabytes of DDR3 memory, and I'm questioning whether this is contributing to the problem. A colleague can smoothly play Battlefield 1 at a frame rate of 144 with my identical graphics card and a significantly more powerful processor (possibly another factor as well), while I struggle to reach 60 frames per second during intense combat scenes on low settings. Do you have any suggestions? Here are my system details:
AMD FX-8350
MSI GTX 970 4gb OC
8gb ddr3 unspecified RAM (manufacturer unknown)
I have space for improvements, and I’m seeking guidance on whether to add an additional 8 gigabytes of DDR3 memory or replace the motherboard completely with a newer Intel processor and 16 gigabytes of DDR4 RAM. Thank you!

K
Kirsten_KitKat
Junior Member
17
10-17-2016, 02:17 AM
#2
Modern combat video games demand a significant amount of processing power, and this will likely be the primary challenge. While 8GB of memory isn’t ideal, it won't be a major limitation.
K
Kirsten_KitKat
10-17-2016, 02:17 AM #2

Modern combat video games demand a significant amount of processing power, and this will likely be the primary challenge. While 8GB of memory isn’t ideal, it won't be a major limitation.

B
baconandfries
Member
215
10-17-2016, 05:20 AM
#3
Modern combat video games place significant strain on your computer’s processor, and this will likely be the most critical limitation. While 8 gigabytes of memory aren’t ideal, it won't be as detrimental as the processing power.
B
baconandfries
10-17-2016, 05:20 AM #3

Modern combat video games place significant strain on your computer’s processor, and this will likely be the most critical limitation. While 8 gigabytes of memory aren’t ideal, it won't be as detrimental as the processing power.

X
xXRAXERXx
Posting Freak
817
10-19-2016, 10:03 AM
#4
Battlefield 1 demands a significant amount of processing power, and an older processor with an FX architecture is exacerbating the problem.
However, keep an eye on your system's performance while playing. Check how your processor, random access memory, and graphics card are performing within the game itself.
If your computer’s memory is consistently reaching 100%, that’s undoubtedly the limiting factor… though, realistically, a weaker processor would likely be the primary issue given only 8GB of RAM.
X
xXRAXERXx
10-19-2016, 10:03 AM #4

Battlefield 1 demands a significant amount of processing power, and an older processor with an FX architecture is exacerbating the problem.
However, keep an eye on your system's performance while playing. Check how your processor, random access memory, and graphics card are performing within the game itself.
If your computer’s memory is consistently reaching 100%, that’s undoubtedly the limiting factor… though, realistically, a weaker processor would likely be the primary issue given only 8GB of RAM.

B
Baren_
Junior Member
12
10-24-2016, 07:53 AM
#5
Thank you all! I’ll need to spend some funds on an upgrade, and I accept that.
B
Baren_
10-24-2016, 07:53 AM #5

Thank you all! I’ll need to spend some funds on an upgrade, and I accept that.

O
OTGDoesGaming
Junior Member
14
10-25-2016, 03:30 PM
#6
With a frame rate of 144, and using a 970 graphics card, you can typically achieve approximately 100 frames per second at maximum settings. The FX-8350 has proven capable in games like this, especially when all its cores are utilized; the website indicates an average performance of 78 frames per second. If the testing was performed within the “campaign” mode, specifically in the 64-player conquest mode, it would likely result in a noticeably lower average due to increased CPU strain. However, the performance should still remain adequate.
You should examine your system for signs of overheating using software like MSI Afterburner to monitor temperatures and display them on screen. Addressing any potential thermal issues is a straightforward and cost-effective solution.
O
OTGDoesGaming
10-25-2016, 03:30 PM #6

With a frame rate of 144, and using a 970 graphics card, you can typically achieve approximately 100 frames per second at maximum settings. The FX-8350 has proven capable in games like this, especially when all its cores are utilized; the website indicates an average performance of 78 frames per second. If the testing was performed within the “campaign” mode, specifically in the 64-player conquest mode, it would likely result in a noticeably lower average due to increased CPU strain. However, the performance should still remain adequate.
You should examine your system for signs of overheating using software like MSI Afterburner to monitor temperatures and display them on screen. Addressing any potential thermal issues is a straightforward and cost-effective solution.