F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking What is the ideal operating temperature for the AMD Ryzen 7 2700?

What is the ideal operating temperature for the AMD Ryzen 7 2700?

What is the ideal operating temperature for the AMD Ryzen 7 2700?

B
blackceaser
Member
119
08-31-2018, 05:20 AM
#1
I just increased my Ryzen 2700 CPU speed from 3.2ghz to 4.0ghz at 1.25v with some stability concerns. The temperatures are high during stress tests (around 86°) but lower while gaming (about 70°).
B
blackceaser
08-31-2018, 05:20 AM #1

I just increased my Ryzen 2700 CPU speed from 3.2ghz to 4.0ghz at 1.25v with some stability concerns. The temperatures are high during stress tests (around 86°) but lower while gaming (about 70°).

J
JP_0620
Junior Member
35
08-31-2018, 06:05 AM
#2
Higher temperature is internally managed by XFR to control core frequency and maintain lower temperatures, and it is also applied individually to each core. An offset temperature is displayed externally for monitoring purposes, allowing adjustments to fan speed accordingly. The latest generation captures more data points, including the highest core temperature, die temperature, and chiplet-specific readings. In dual-chiplet configurations such as 39xx, individual chiplet temperatures are shown. Core temperature information is utilized by XFR and PBO, serving both safety and performance metrics. Temperatures above approximately 95°C trigger shutdown to avoid damage during overheating conditions.
J
JP_0620
08-31-2018, 06:05 AM #2

Higher temperature is internally managed by XFR to control core frequency and maintain lower temperatures, and it is also applied individually to each core. An offset temperature is displayed externally for monitoring purposes, allowing adjustments to fan speed accordingly. The latest generation captures more data points, including the highest core temperature, die temperature, and chiplet-specific readings. In dual-chiplet configurations such as 39xx, individual chiplet temperatures are shown. Core temperature information is utilized by XFR and PBO, serving both safety and performance metrics. Temperatures above approximately 95°C trigger shutdown to avoid damage during overheating conditions.

J
JoaolMalk
Junior Member
26
09-11-2018, 01:40 PM
#3
AMD sets 85°C as the upper limit for safe operation of a Ryzen™ 7 2700X. Generally, having a thermal buffer of 20°C to 30°C at the base is recommended before considering overclocking.
J
JoaolMalk
09-11-2018, 01:40 PM #3

AMD sets 85°C as the upper limit for safe operation of a Ryzen™ 7 2700X. Generally, having a thermal buffer of 20°C to 30°C at the base is recommended before considering overclocking.

M
masonburk
Junior Member
28
09-19-2018, 05:33 AM
#4
Certainly, this information applies to the 2700X model. AMD provides a published maximum temperature of 95°C for this processor. It's important to aim for lower temperatures to prevent any further wear, with 85°C serving as a practical target for stable performance during prolonged intensive operations. This specific temperature aligns well with the point where my CPU reaches stable operation under heavy workloads (such as prime95) when all settings are optimized.
M
masonburk
09-19-2018, 05:33 AM #4

Certainly, this information applies to the 2700X model. AMD provides a published maximum temperature of 95°C for this processor. It's important to aim for lower temperatures to prevent any further wear, with 85°C serving as a practical target for stable performance during prolonged intensive operations. This specific temperature aligns well with the point where my CPU reaches stable operation under heavy workloads (such as prime95) when all settings are optimized.

K
Killerwalrus03
Junior Member
4
09-24-2018, 06:16 AM
#5
It's noteworthy that the 2700 and 2700X models show a 10°C variation in maximum operating temperatures. All other eight CPU generations (1000, 2000, and 3000 series) maintain a temperature of 95°C, while the 2700X stands at 85°C. Even the six-core variants remain at 95°C, which raises the question about whether the 2700X data might contain an error.
K
Killerwalrus03
09-24-2018, 06:16 AM #5

It's noteworthy that the 2700 and 2700X models show a 10°C variation in maximum operating temperatures. All other eight CPU generations (1000, 2000, and 3000 series) maintain a temperature of 95°C, while the 2700X stands at 85°C. Even the six-core variants remain at 95°C, which raises the question about whether the 2700X data might contain an error.

L
Luxius55
Junior Member
11
09-28-2018, 05:31 PM
#6
I seriously question whether this was an error left unnoticed for years, repeatedly appearing in every CPU box manual (tiny...use a magnifier) and causing significant financial issues for the company (warranty claims versus market performance). Leaders in marketing and IT would likely be concerned about such a situation.

It seems more related to the 105W TDP of a 2700X, affecting its operational limits. This chip is also well recognized for its strong reaction to PBO adjustments, often delivering impressive sustained speed improvements even under heavy use when properly cooled.
L
Luxius55
09-28-2018, 05:31 PM #6

I seriously question whether this was an error left unnoticed for years, repeatedly appearing in every CPU box manual (tiny...use a magnifier) and causing significant financial issues for the company (warranty claims versus market performance). Leaders in marketing and IT would likely be concerned about such a situation.

It seems more related to the 105W TDP of a 2700X, affecting its operational limits. This chip is also well recognized for its strong reaction to PBO adjustments, often delivering impressive sustained speed improvements even under heavy use when properly cooled.

E
EisTeeKlaus
Senior Member
490
09-30-2018, 08:38 AM
#7
X models feature a 20°C offset, while the second generation Ryzen uses a 10°C offset for internal core temperatures. The most critical parameter remains the CPU (tdie) temperature reading.
E
EisTeeKlaus
09-30-2018, 08:38 AM #7

X models feature a 20°C offset, while the second generation Ryzen uses a 10°C offset for internal core temperatures. The most critical parameter remains the CPU (tdie) temperature reading.

A
arc9819
Member
219
10-02-2018, 09:23 AM
#8
"It's quite the complicated situation we create when we start trying to mislead."
-Walter Scott, Marmion
Whenever the strange 'offset' appears in these discussions, it's the initial thought that comes to mind.
A
arc9819
10-02-2018, 09:23 AM #8

"It's quite the complicated situation we create when we start trying to mislead."
-Walter Scott, Marmion
Whenever the strange 'offset' appears in these discussions, it's the initial thought that comes to mind.

X
xAPPLExPIEx
Senior Member
657
10-02-2018, 10:42 PM
#9
Higher temperature is internally managed by XFR to control core frequency and maintain lower temperatures, while also applied individually to each core. An offset temperature is displayed externally for monitoring and used to adjust fan speed accordingly. The latest generation captures more data points, including the highest core temperature, chiplet status, and even per-chiplet readings. In dual-chiplet configurations such as 39xx, individual chiplet temperatures are shown. Core temperature information is utilized by XFR and PBO. These values serve both safety and performance purposes. A cutoff point around 95°C triggers shutdown to avoid damage; above 62-65°C the core's boost is reduced to preserve integrity, ensuring performance remains stable.
X
xAPPLExPIEx
10-02-2018, 10:42 PM #9

Higher temperature is internally managed by XFR to control core frequency and maintain lower temperatures, while also applied individually to each core. An offset temperature is displayed externally for monitoring and used to adjust fan speed accordingly. The latest generation captures more data points, including the highest core temperature, chiplet status, and even per-chiplet readings. In dual-chiplet configurations such as 39xx, individual chiplet temperatures are shown. Core temperature information is utilized by XFR and PBO. These values serve both safety and performance purposes. A cutoff point around 95°C triggers shutdown to avoid damage; above 62-65°C the core's boost is reduced to preserve integrity, ensuring performance remains stable.