F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking What is a suitable voltage for continuous overclocking?

What is a suitable voltage for continuous overclocking?

What is a suitable voltage for continuous overclocking?

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
C
Cupcake_Rose
Posting Freak
844
12-29-2017, 01:40 AM
#1
Hello, I'm a beginner in overclocking and seeking advice on a safe constant voltage for my Ryzen 5 1600. I'm currently at 3.9ghz with 1.425 volts, needing stability while typing. I'm concerned about potential crashes after using Cinebench. Should I try a more stable 4ghz target at 1.45 volts or maintain my current 3.8 overclock below 1.4 volts? My motherboard is an MSI B350 Tomahawk, and I plan to upgrade to an H100i cooler later.
C
Cupcake_Rose
12-29-2017, 01:40 AM #1

Hello, I'm a beginner in overclocking and seeking advice on a safe constant voltage for my Ryzen 5 1600. I'm currently at 3.9ghz with 1.425 volts, needing stability while typing. I'm concerned about potential crashes after using Cinebench. Should I try a more stable 4ghz target at 1.45 volts or maintain my current 3.8 overclock below 1.4 volts? My motherboard is an MSI B350 Tomahawk, and I plan to upgrade to an H100i cooler later.

Z
zProPlayer
Member
123
12-29-2017, 05:31 PM
#2
I think 1.45V is the commonly recognized upper limit for Ryzen processors, provided adequate cooling is available.
I recall seeing a suggestion from AMD about a range around 1.35V, but it's hard to find that now.
For myself, I prefer a clock speed of 3.8GHz at below 1.4V, though it wouldn't hurt to test stability at 3.9GHz with 1.45V.
Z
zProPlayer
12-29-2017, 05:31 PM #2

I think 1.45V is the commonly recognized upper limit for Ryzen processors, provided adequate cooling is available.
I recall seeing a suggestion from AMD about a range around 1.35V, but it's hard to find that now.
For myself, I prefer a clock speed of 3.8GHz at below 1.4V, though it wouldn't hurt to test stability at 3.9GHz with 1.45V.

K
Kimplaze
Member
216
12-29-2017, 05:37 PM
#3
I think 1.45V is the commonly recognized upper limit for Ryzen processors, provided adequate cooling is available.
I recall seeing a suggestion from AMD about a range around 1.35V, but it’s hard to find that now.
For myself, I’d prefer a clock speed of 3.8GHz at below 1.4V, though it wouldn’t hurt to test stability at 3.9GHz with 1.45V.
K
Kimplaze
12-29-2017, 05:37 PM #3

I think 1.45V is the commonly recognized upper limit for Ryzen processors, provided adequate cooling is available.
I recall seeing a suggestion from AMD about a range around 1.35V, but it’s hard to find that now.
For myself, I’d prefer a clock speed of 3.8GHz at below 1.4V, though it wouldn’t hurt to test stability at 3.9GHz with 1.45V.

S
sjgames
Junior Member
8
12-30-2017, 09:29 PM
#4
Well, 3.9 crashed at 1.45, so I don't think I can go higher. 3.9 got my hopes up, it waited till the end of the cinebench test to crash
🙁 I also noticed I've been keeping my CPU at 1.45 volts all the time because I had gome boost on
🙁
S
sjgames
12-30-2017, 09:29 PM #4

Well, 3.9 crashed at 1.45, so I don't think I can go higher. 3.9 got my hopes up, it waited till the end of the cinebench test to crash
🙁 I also noticed I've been keeping my CPU at 1.45 volts all the time because I had gome boost on
🙁

3
333LegenD333
Junior Member
46
12-31-2017, 08:30 AM
#5
1.45V probably won't damage your CPU, but it seems like you're experiencing unusually high temperatures with that setting on the stock cooler. The cooler usually handles around 1.3V well, which typically gives you stable performance at 3.7-3.8GHz. It might indicate a faulty chip or possibly a problem with the board.
3
333LegenD333
12-31-2017, 08:30 AM #5

1.45V probably won't damage your CPU, but it seems like you're experiencing unusually high temperatures with that setting on the stock cooler. The cooler usually handles around 1.3V well, which typically gives you stable performance at 3.7-3.8GHz. It might indicate a faulty chip or possibly a problem with the board.

M
Marxs00
Junior Member
38
12-31-2017, 09:59 AM
#6
Sure, I'm happy to help with that. Just to confirm, you're considering a 3.8ghz processor with a clock speed of 1.375 and wondering if 55 degrees during idle is acceptable.
M
Marxs00
12-31-2017, 09:59 AM #6

Sure, I'm happy to help with that. Just to confirm, you're considering a 3.8ghz processor with a clock speed of 1.375 and wondering if 55 degrees during idle is acceptable.

S
snuttisnutti
Member
206
12-31-2017, 11:53 AM
#7
Also, Cinebench isn't the best way to confirm stability, you should try Aida64 for a longer time (different people have varying views – personally I aim for at least an hour).
55'C Idle might be a bit high, but it makes sense considering the voltage and cooling.
Idle isn't critical, what's important is how the load temperatures behave.
After a good stress test, what temperatures are you observing?
S
snuttisnutti
12-31-2017, 11:53 AM #7

Also, Cinebench isn't the best way to confirm stability, you should try Aida64 for a longer time (different people have varying views – personally I aim for at least an hour).
55'C Idle might be a bit high, but it makes sense considering the voltage and cooling.
Idle isn't critical, what's important is how the load temperatures behave.
After a good stress test, what temperatures are you observing?

P
Paddy2p
Member
138
12-31-2017, 08:18 PM
#8
Raised to 96, yet it's presently near 80 in Aida 64.
P
Paddy2p
12-31-2017, 08:18 PM #8

Raised to 96, yet it's presently near 80 in Aida 64.

Y
YoungVerzide
Member
180
01-01-2018, 08:52 PM
#9
In under 10 minutes?
Y
YoungVerzide
01-01-2018, 08:52 PM #9

In under 10 minutes?

A
Amtrak10
Senior Member
639
01-01-2018, 10:29 PM
#10
I'll keep it running for an hour and check if the temperatures shift.
A
Amtrak10
01-01-2018, 10:29 PM #10

I'll keep it running for an hour and check if the temperatures shift.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next