F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming What FPS games work on a Pentium 4 2.4 GHz with an ATI Radeon Sapphire HD 3650 AGP?

What FPS games work on a Pentium 4 2.4 GHz with an ATI Radeon Sapphire HD 3650 AGP?

What FPS games work on a Pentium 4 2.4 GHz with an ATI Radeon Sapphire HD 3650 AGP?

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
X
xxteddymanxx
Junior Member
13
12-17-2025, 12:15 AM
#11
It was the initial crisis, and a Pentium would struggle significantly with that game. The GPU would also face challenges because much of the game's weight comes from graphics.
X
xxteddymanxx
12-17-2025, 12:15 AM #11

It was the initial crisis, and a Pentium would struggle significantly with that game. The GPU would also face challenges because much of the game's weight comes from graphics.

B
63
12-17-2025, 01:04 PM
#12
Crysis 1 could function reasonably well at lower resolutions. The difficulty in running it for extended periods stemmed from the engine being designed around single-core chips, which didn't align with Intel's original goal of 10Ghz. Multicore processors offered little improvement. The graphics engine was also developed to incorporate advanced features, allowing it to perform more effectively.
B
bunnywithabowl
12-17-2025, 01:04 PM #12

Crysis 1 could function reasonably well at lower resolutions. The difficulty in running it for extended periods stemmed from the engine being designed around single-core chips, which didn't align with Intel's original goal of 10Ghz. Multicore processors offered little improvement. The graphics engine was also developed to incorporate advanced features, allowing it to perform more effectively.

F
facianoir
Junior Member
41
12-21-2025, 04:47 AM
#13
YIKES!
F
facianoir
12-21-2025, 04:47 AM #13

YIKES!

E
epicusmagnus
Junior Member
11
12-21-2025, 01:29 PM
#14
It was a typical choice back then. I believe I used it at 1280x1024 with an 8800 GTS, around 40 frames per second. However, my card was a basic blower from the era, so it warmed up fast and I avoided playing that game out of concern it might fail. It wasn't really my style, and it hasn't been for me yet.
E
epicusmagnus
12-21-2025, 01:29 PM #14

It was a typical choice back then. I believe I used it at 1280x1024 with an 8800 GTS, around 40 frames per second. However, my card was a basic blower from the era, so it warmed up fast and I avoided playing that game out of concern it might fail. It wasn't really my style, and it hasn't been for me yet.

C
CapivaraManca
Member
152
12-22-2025, 03:46 PM
#15
The CPU inside is now a Northwood. The motherboard features an Intel 865PE chipset, though I can't pinpoint the precise model—it was included with the system from 2003.
C
CapivaraManca
12-22-2025, 03:46 PM #15

The CPU inside is now a Northwood. The motherboard features an Intel 865PE chipset, though I can't pinpoint the precise model—it was included with the system from 2003.

U
Unmigrate
Senior Member
644
12-23-2025, 06:48 PM
#16
CPU compatibility depends on the BIOS version, so you should verify the specific support. However, this chipset typically works well in general.
U
Unmigrate
12-23-2025, 06:48 PM #16

CPU compatibility depends on the BIOS version, so you should verify the specific support. However, this chipset typically works well in general.

H
HellaDapper
Member
225
01-08-2026, 03:38 AM
#17
i865 represented the most adaptable P4 chipset line, and i865g supports Asrock 775i65G even with Core 2 Quads (including DDR1 and AGP) when boosted to the standard 1066FSB. However, using a Pentium E5800 based on Core 2 architecture proved more common, since its stock 800FSB didn’t face long startup delays.

This approach isn’t ideal for unknown mystery socket 478 boards, though, because it demands BIOS microcode for Core 2 support. While adapters exist to fit S478 chips into LGA775 sockets, there were no solutions for the reverse. The LGA775 design included additional pins to handle higher power delivery for the anticipated 7-10GHz Pentium 5 Tejas processors.

If you have an overclockable board with voltage regulation, a 3.06HT would be a good choice—it offers a lower stock 533FSB and a higher multiplier, typically running around 3.45GHz. In the past, this setup achieved approximately 40fps in F.E.A.R. with the internal benchmark and X850XT, with soft shadows turned off. I also upgraded all my Pentium 4 laptops to 3.06HT from 800FSB HT models, as they performed more stably and cooled better, especially compared to the Prescotts. Those who chose those in laptops clearly made a mistake.
H
HellaDapper
01-08-2026, 03:38 AM #17

i865 represented the most adaptable P4 chipset line, and i865g supports Asrock 775i65G even with Core 2 Quads (including DDR1 and AGP) when boosted to the standard 1066FSB. However, using a Pentium E5800 based on Core 2 architecture proved more common, since its stock 800FSB didn’t face long startup delays.

This approach isn’t ideal for unknown mystery socket 478 boards, though, because it demands BIOS microcode for Core 2 support. While adapters exist to fit S478 chips into LGA775 sockets, there were no solutions for the reverse. The LGA775 design included additional pins to handle higher power delivery for the anticipated 7-10GHz Pentium 5 Tejas processors.

If you have an overclockable board with voltage regulation, a 3.06HT would be a good choice—it offers a lower stock 533FSB and a higher multiplier, typically running around 3.45GHz. In the past, this setup achieved approximately 40fps in F.E.A.R. with the internal benchmark and X850XT, with soft shadows turned off. I also upgraded all my Pentium 4 laptops to 3.06HT from 800FSB HT models, as they performed more stably and cooled better, especially compared to the Prescotts. Those who chose those in laptops clearly made a mistake.

W
Wvortel
Junior Member
6
01-20-2026, 12:35 AM
#18
The majority of dx8 and dx9 games should function properly.
W
Wvortel
01-20-2026, 12:35 AM #18

The majority of dx8 and dx9 games should function properly.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2