What do you think about Microsoft's response? Can I receive the share?
What do you think about Microsoft's response? Can I receive the share?
When Windows 8.1 launched, I shared thoughts on both the Windows Facebook page and Google+ (the latter no longer exists). Now, reflecting on what the future of Windows might look like with a revamped start menu and improved compatibility, I realize my earlier remarks were inspired by that discussion. Here’s the comment I made on the Windows 8.1 announcement:
"Hello Microsoft, Do you truly understand why you fell short or at least face criticism from many users about Windows 8? I believe your leaders have conducted extensive research and continue to explore reasons behind the mixed reactions to Windows 8. But have your responses been satisfactory? I’d like to highlight key areas of improvement.
Firstly, consider the real needs of users. There are two groups: those who enjoy exploring, experimenting, and playing with new features daily, and those who prefer sticking to familiar routines without change. Many people like me fall into the latter category—preferring comfort over innovation. Windows 8 was a bold idea for touch compatibility, which I appreciate. However, your approach fell short of satisfying this segment, leading to the feedback we see today.
You introduced some interesting features, like animations in the Metro UI, but these seem more decorative than functional. What’s essential is streamlining the experience—reducing unnecessary elements and focusing on core tasks. The traditional start menu was a game-changer for many, offering a familiar way to launch apps. Removing or reviving it could help bridge the gap between innovation and usability.
My suggestions include restoring the classic start menu, enhancing its functionality with extra options, integrating notifications directly into it, and syncing with mobile devices. This would make the interface more intuitive and encourage adoption of Windows 8. I’m confident that addressing these points could improve satisfaction across all user types."
Regarding the future, I hope your updates will better balance creativity with practicality, ensuring Windows remains accessible and enjoyable for everyone."
As for the feedback, I’m sure my words were inspired by this conversation. The screenshot is attached for reference. I’m not taking it personally, but I’m glad to see progress toward a more user-friendly experience."
Beyond that, I believe not all criticism stemmed from unique circumstances—it mainly arose because the design prioritized a touch interface over the majority's preferred methods. While it functioned with a mouse and keyboard, it often took a backseat to the touch-based experience, which remains uncommon today. I'm pleased with the latest updates since they position Windows 8 as the intended operating system from the beginning, offering two solid interfaces for any input style without forcing users to choose one over the other.
Stardock feels quite rough compared to Windows 7. It lacks a polished finish.
Ignoring hate mail is pointless; it only wastes your effort. The opening line is enough for them to immediately delete your post. Even if they read more, they won’t, and acting like a 'Mr. Know it all manager but knows nothing' comes across negatively. Telling someone to do something and then shifting blame makes you seem out of touch. No one took what was presented at BUILD, since it didn’t align with your request.
It might not align, but the idea of combining ph and desktop with the start menu is what I discussed earlier. All notifications appear directly in the start menu. I’m not sure about the caption—just hoping the smiley helps clarify things. I’m really looking forward to seeing what comes next...