F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Warning: Numerous ROM options are running simultaneously...

Warning: Numerous ROM options are running simultaneously...

Warning: Numerous ROM options are running simultaneously...

G
GotEide
Member
202
11-20-2016, 02:41 PM
#1
Hello! I’ll try to summarize my setup quickly. I have two SSDs installed: WD Green 240 GB X2 (Raid 0 via native ports, Intel controller) and a Goldenfir SU650 512 GB with ACOS 512 GB (connected to Marvell 6 Gb/s ports). Both are performing well, though the Goldenfir is hitting its speed limit at around 375 MB/s. I attempted to set both as Raid 0 in BIOS, but the system showed an odd message saying it’s poorly written and asking if I should ignore it. I’m worried about losing my current RAID setup or overwriting it when enabling Raid 0 again. The Windows 10 RAID 0 configuration is showing lower speeds than the Goldenfir alone. I don’t want to reinstall anything, so I need advice on whether I can safely proceed despite this warning.
G
GotEide
11-20-2016, 02:41 PM #1

Hello! I’ll try to summarize my setup quickly. I have two SSDs installed: WD Green 240 GB X2 (Raid 0 via native ports, Intel controller) and a Goldenfir SU650 512 GB with ACOS 512 GB (connected to Marvell 6 Gb/s ports). Both are performing well, though the Goldenfir is hitting its speed limit at around 375 MB/s. I attempted to set both as Raid 0 in BIOS, but the system showed an odd message saying it’s poorly written and asking if I should ignore it. I’m worried about losing my current RAID setup or overwriting it when enabling Raid 0 again. The Windows 10 RAID 0 configuration is showing lower speeds than the Goldenfir alone. I don’t want to reinstall anything, so I need advice on whether I can safely proceed despite this warning.

D
DoctorOmar
Member
229
11-21-2016, 07:04 AM
#2
Considering the topic, it would make more sense to place it in the "Storage Devices" section.
D
DoctorOmar
11-21-2016, 07:04 AM #2

Considering the topic, it would make more sense to place it in the "Storage Devices" section.

H
hanniie_
Junior Member
36
11-21-2016, 03:49 PM
#3
I tried to address the same problem later on by linking both SSDs to the original Intel SATA2 ports. Result: Enabling both Intel and Marvell controllers in Raid mode didn’t stress the BIOS ROM. But turning on Marvell 88SE9172’s Raid 0 mode didn’t boost performance over a Windows 10 setup. Both Marvell ports perform marginally better than Intel SATA2, but using them together isn’t effective—they likely share the same I/O path. My motherboard (Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3 Rev. 1.0) is quite outdated now, and back then high-speed SSDs weren’t common. Even with both SSDs on SATA2 ports, speeds stayed around 600 MB/s, indicating the issue lies in the motherboard’s chipset or CPU. Marvell (ACOS 512 GB + Goldenfir SU650 512 GB) and Intel (SATA3 ports) links provided.
H
hanniie_
11-21-2016, 03:49 PM #3

I tried to address the same problem later on by linking both SSDs to the original Intel SATA2 ports. Result: Enabling both Intel and Marvell controllers in Raid mode didn’t stress the BIOS ROM. But turning on Marvell 88SE9172’s Raid 0 mode didn’t boost performance over a Windows 10 setup. Both Marvell ports perform marginally better than Intel SATA2, but using them together isn’t effective—they likely share the same I/O path. My motherboard (Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3 Rev. 1.0) is quite outdated now, and back then high-speed SSDs weren’t common. Even with both SSDs on SATA2 ports, speeds stayed around 600 MB/s, indicating the issue lies in the motherboard’s chipset or CPU. Marvell (ACOS 512 GB + Goldenfir SU650 512 GB) and Intel (SATA3 ports) links provided.