F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Very poor performance metrics at 5950x

Very poor performance metrics at 5950x

Very poor performance metrics at 5950x

K
kika_BR
Member
144
08-22-2021, 01:59 PM
#1
Hey, I'm facing really low scores with my 5950x. I just upgraded the chipset and BIOS to see if that helps. My 3080ti also stopped working, so I switched it to a 2080 while I handle the return or figure things out. I'm using Default for Ryzen Master, A-XMP is turned on to profile 1, Precision Boost Overdrive is active, and Game Boost is off. My Passmark specs are: CAS : LIAN LI PC-O11 Dynamic ATX Mid-Tower Dual chamber Gaming Case with USB 3.1 Type-C, tempered glass front and sides [+38] (Black). The CPU is AMD Ryzen™ 9 5950X at 3.4GHz (up to 4.9GHz turbo), 16 cores/32 threads, 72MB total cache, 105W power. The CPU fan includes 6x 120mm APEVIA fans with hub and remote control. The cooler uses CoolerMaster MASTERLIQUID ML360 Illusion Dual-Chamber pump with copper cold plate. For storage, I have a 240GB WD Green SSD M.2 SATA plus a 1TB SATA III drive combo. There are built-in USB ports depending on the board and case. Memory is 32GB (16GBx2) DDR4/3200MHz dual channel, GSKILL Trident Z RGB. The motherboard is MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS ATX with Realtek LAN, plus various PCIe slots. I have an onboard Gigabit LAN network and Windows 11 Home as the OS. Overclocking isn't enabled. Power supply is a 1000w Platnium rated unit. No wiring needed. Audio/video output is a 7.1 surround sound setup. Overall, it seems like the hardware specs are solid but performance might still be limited by software or other factors.
K
kika_BR
08-22-2021, 01:59 PM #1

Hey, I'm facing really low scores with my 5950x. I just upgraded the chipset and BIOS to see if that helps. My 3080ti also stopped working, so I switched it to a 2080 while I handle the return or figure things out. I'm using Default for Ryzen Master, A-XMP is turned on to profile 1, Precision Boost Overdrive is active, and Game Boost is off. My Passmark specs are: CAS : LIAN LI PC-O11 Dynamic ATX Mid-Tower Dual chamber Gaming Case with USB 3.1 Type-C, tempered glass front and sides [+38] (Black). The CPU is AMD Ryzen™ 9 5950X at 3.4GHz (up to 4.9GHz turbo), 16 cores/32 threads, 72MB total cache, 105W power. The CPU fan includes 6x 120mm APEVIA fans with hub and remote control. The cooler uses CoolerMaster MASTERLIQUID ML360 Illusion Dual-Chamber pump with copper cold plate. For storage, I have a 240GB WD Green SSD M.2 SATA plus a 1TB SATA III drive combo. There are built-in USB ports depending on the board and case. Memory is 32GB (16GBx2) DDR4/3200MHz dual channel, GSKILL Trident Z RGB. The motherboard is MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS ATX with Realtek LAN, plus various PCIe slots. I have an onboard Gigabit LAN network and Windows 11 Home as the OS. Overclocking isn't enabled. Power supply is a 1000w Platnium rated unit. No wiring needed. Audio/video output is a 7.1 surround sound setup. Overall, it seems like the hardware specs are solid but performance might still be limited by software or other factors.

A
awsomename999
Member
103
08-29-2021, 07:00 AM
#2
How warm it becomes is significant; you can verify using HWmonitor. Its performance in cinebench yields a specific rating.
A
awsomename999
08-29-2021, 07:00 AM #2

How warm it becomes is significant; you can verify using HWmonitor. Its performance in cinebench yields a specific rating.

C
Cl0ud_Client
Member
169
09-11-2021, 12:55 AM
#3
Scored 1810 during Cinebench multi test. Idle performance recorded.
C
Cl0ud_Client
09-11-2021, 12:55 AM #3

Scored 1810 during Cinebench multi test. Idle performance recorded.

W
WF_Catt
Posting Freak
761
09-12-2021, 10:41 AM
#4
I discovered that Reddit discussion and adjusted the configurations... right away I checked the 27715 Cinebench and 49262 scores for the Passmark CPUMark test. I’m curious why it performed so poorly previously. Are these default settings really unsuitable for this processor?
W
WF_Catt
09-12-2021, 10:41 AM #4

I discovered that Reddit discussion and adjusted the configurations... right away I checked the 27715 Cinebench and 49262 scores for the Passmark CPUMark test. I’m curious why it performed so poorly previously. Are these default settings really unsuitable for this processor?

X
Xavel12
Junior Member
15
09-23-2021, 01:57 AM
#5
You're right, the message no longer includes that warning. It seems the system has updated its output.
X
Xavel12
09-23-2021, 01:57 AM #5

You're right, the message no longer includes that warning. It seems the system has updated its output.