F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Verify Wi-Fi standards and compatibility.

Verify Wi-Fi standards and compatibility.

Verify Wi-Fi standards and compatibility.

R
Ryugoo
Member
93
01-05-2019, 12:34 PM
#1
Hi, I'm thinking about replacing my wifi.bluetooth chip because I'm having problems with the one I have (refer to my previous post on audio issues). I came across this one: https://www.ldlc.com/fiche/PB00487856.html What worries me is that only Wi-Fi 6 is mentioned as supported, while my router still runs Wi-Fi 5. From what I've read online, this shouldn't be a big problem, but the fact that Wi-Fi 6 isn't listed makes me a bit concerned. Even if it does work, I'm unsure if this chip is reliable since it uses a Mediabarc card, which seems questionable to me.
R
Ryugoo
01-05-2019, 12:34 PM #1

Hi, I'm thinking about replacing my wifi.bluetooth chip because I'm having problems with the one I have (refer to my previous post on audio issues). I came across this one: https://www.ldlc.com/fiche/PB00487856.html What worries me is that only Wi-Fi 6 is mentioned as supported, while my router still runs Wi-Fi 5. From what I've read online, this shouldn't be a big problem, but the fact that Wi-Fi 6 isn't listed makes me a bit concerned. Even if it does work, I'm unsure if this chip is reliable since it uses a Mediabarc card, which seems questionable to me.

S
samy1002
Member
186
01-05-2019, 02:16 PM
#2
It's backward compatible, so not an issue. I tend to go with Intel-based wireless/BT adapters for peace of mind. There's no significant difference in cost. If the adapter you mentioned is what you have easiest access to, then go ahead. It's an Asus adapter, so should work as intended.
S
samy1002
01-05-2019, 02:16 PM #2

It's backward compatible, so not an issue. I tend to go with Intel-based wireless/BT adapters for peace of mind. There's no significant difference in cost. If the adapter you mentioned is what you have easiest access to, then go ahead. It's an Asus adapter, so should work as intended.

S
shadeslayer202
Junior Member
39
01-22-2019, 08:24 PM
#3
Sure, happy to help! You can ask about the reasons behind it, and yes, Intel chips are often considered more reliable.
S
shadeslayer202
01-22-2019, 08:24 PM #3

Sure, happy to help! You can ask about the reasons behind it, and yes, Intel chips are often considered more reliable.

M
monkey_farz
Member
153
01-27-2019, 01:45 PM
#4
As a general rule yes. Less likely to hit weird compatibility issues. I've also found the AX210 based cards achieve a faster speed on WiFi 5 than the AX200 ones. This may be down to the radio amplifier needing to more efficient at the higher 5Ghz range due to needing to support 6Ghz too.
M
monkey_farz
01-27-2019, 01:45 PM #4

As a general rule yes. Less likely to hit weird compatibility issues. I've also found the AX210 based cards achieve a faster speed on WiFi 5 than the AX200 ones. This may be down to the radio amplifier needing to more efficient at the higher 5Ghz range due to needing to support 6Ghz too.