F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Various results PBO versus all core OC

Various results PBO versus all core OC

Various results PBO versus all core OC

S
swatkid10
Junior Member
5
08-30-2016, 08:13 AM
#1
Hello! It seems you're curious about how different settings affect your gaming performance. The results you're seeing—higher scores with default PBO and lower scores when manually tuning cores—can be influenced by several factors. It's not unusual for performance to vary based on hardware configuration and settings. Let me know if you'd like more details!
S
swatkid10
08-30-2016, 08:13 AM #1

Hello! It seems you're curious about how different settings affect your gaming performance. The results you're seeing—higher scores with default PBO and lower scores when manually tuning cores—can be influenced by several factors. It's not unusual for performance to vary based on hardware configuration and settings. Let me know if you'd like more details!

B
BloozerMan
Junior Member
14
08-31-2016, 07:16 AM
#2
In certain cases, all core OCs can outperform PBO occasionally, though I'd question a 20% improvement.
B
BloozerMan
08-31-2016, 07:16 AM #2

In certain cases, all core OCs can outperform PBO occasionally, though I'd question a 20% improvement.

D
DingbatPlayzMC
Senior Member
425
08-31-2016, 03:48 PM
#3
Cinebench is designed to test multiple cores effectively, though the single-core mode still applies. It offers noticeable gains with full-core optimization, making it ideal for tasks like Precision Boost and PBO that provide quick improvements. These benchmarks are crafted to challenge cores individually, rather than demanding all cores simultaneously for long durations. The performance boost comes from completing numerous short tasks efficiently, which is more representative of real-world usage than sustained all-core runs. Ultimately, the best approach depends on your system's workload—often letting the CPU handle everything is preferable, especially on AMD platforms.
D
DingbatPlayzMC
08-31-2016, 03:48 PM #3

Cinebench is designed to test multiple cores effectively, though the single-core mode still applies. It offers noticeable gains with full-core optimization, making it ideal for tasks like Precision Boost and PBO that provide quick improvements. These benchmarks are crafted to challenge cores individually, rather than demanding all cores simultaneously for long durations. The performance boost comes from completing numerous short tasks efficiently, which is more representative of real-world usage than sustained all-core runs. Ultimately, the best approach depends on your system's workload—often letting the CPU handle everything is preferable, especially on AMD platforms.

I
Ipod984
Senior Member
707
08-31-2016, 07:56 PM
#4
3900 looks significantly off compared to expectations for a 3700X. It should hover near 4800–4900 at stock value, roughly a hundred points higher with PBO and even more with a high all-core OC. It seems the game is either throttling or stuck at a lower clock speed than usual, which explains the poor score.
I
Ipod984
08-31-2016, 07:56 PM #4

3900 looks significantly off compared to expectations for a 3700X. It should hover near 4800–4900 at stock value, roughly a hundred points higher with PBO and even more with a high all-core OC. It seems the game is either throttling or stuck at a lower clock speed than usual, which explains the poor score.

1
1CraftyGirl
Member
100
09-07-2016, 12:50 AM
#5
The PBO configuration isn't reliable.
1
1CraftyGirl
09-07-2016, 12:50 AM #5

The PBO configuration isn't reliable.