F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Upgrades!

Upgrades!

Upgrades!

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
C
Celticale59
Junior Member
5
06-15-2016, 10:17 AM
#1
Hello everyone, I'm considering upgrading my i5-6600K to an i5-9600F. I'm curious if my motherboard can support that change. It has a 1151 socket and I already have a dedicated GPU for graphics, but I'm not sure about the chipset. How can I identify the chipset and would this upgrade be worthwhile? Since I mainly play games, it makes sense. I've noticed many videos suggesting limited gains from moving to 10th generation, and it seems like a different motherboard might be needed.
C
Celticale59
06-15-2016, 10:17 AM #1

Hello everyone, I'm considering upgrading my i5-6600K to an i5-9600F. I'm curious if my motherboard can support that change. It has a 1151 socket and I already have a dedicated GPU for graphics, but I'm not sure about the chipset. How can I identify the chipset and would this upgrade be worthwhile? Since I mainly play games, it makes sense. I've noticed many videos suggesting limited gains from moving to 10th generation, and it seems like a different motherboard might be needed.

_
_NeoBl0X_
Senior Member
635
06-19-2016, 04:31 PM
#2
You don't require a motherboard with a 1151 (300) socket
_
_NeoBl0X_
06-19-2016, 04:31 PM #2

You don't require a motherboard with a 1151 (300) socket

U
undeadred15
Junior Member
32
06-19-2016, 10:28 PM
#3
You'll require a 300 series chipset to run the i5 9600F.
U
undeadred15
06-19-2016, 10:28 PM #3

You'll require a 300 series chipset to run the i5 9600F.

B
Brandon_En
Member
246
06-19-2016, 10:52 PM
#4
Maybe yes, I need to upgrade my motherboard.
B
Brandon_En
06-19-2016, 10:52 PM #4

Maybe yes, I need to upgrade my motherboard.

N
53
06-20-2016, 12:25 AM
#5
Yes
N
ninjagamer2004
06-20-2016, 12:25 AM #5

Yes

K
kcaz56
Senior Member
664
06-20-2016, 02:15 AM
#6
K
kcaz56
06-20-2016, 02:15 AM #6

D
Dragoonyan
Member
61
06-21-2016, 01:48 PM
#7
All the videos I've watched indicate AMD typically delivers fewer frames per second compared to Intel.
D
Dragoonyan
06-21-2016, 01:48 PM #7

All the videos I've watched indicate AMD typically delivers fewer frames per second compared to Intel.

S
sosobub123
Member
80
06-21-2016, 02:02 PM
#8
They also provide a more affordable option.
S
sosobub123
06-21-2016, 02:02 PM #8

They also provide a more affordable option.

H
hannah663
Member
169
06-23-2016, 02:42 PM
#9
The focus is on getting the best return on investment. Intel remains dominant in gaming, though not overwhelmingly so, while AMD excels in offering strong value. You're essentially paying around $500 for 100 frames per second or $400 for 95 FPS. Your money matters now, but currently, AMD is outperforming Intel at the high-end level. Even if your Intel graphics card is cheaper, it's outdated and lacks future potential.
H
hannah663
06-23-2016, 02:42 PM #9

The focus is on getting the best return on investment. Intel remains dominant in gaming, though not overwhelmingly so, while AMD excels in offering strong value. You're essentially paying around $500 for 100 frames per second or $400 for 95 FPS. Your money matters now, but currently, AMD is outperforming Intel at the high-end level. Even if your Intel graphics card is cheaper, it's outdated and lacks future potential.

G
gr4tix
Member
70
06-28-2016, 08:13 AM
#10
They are significantly cheaper, with FPS typically only about 5% lower than others, and the difference is usually minor. They also offer better performance across multiple cores, though Intel leads in gaming specifically, while AMD matches Intel well for multi-core tasks.
G
gr4tix
06-28-2016, 08:13 AM #10

They are significantly cheaper, with FPS typically only about 5% lower than others, and the difference is usually minor. They also offer better performance across multiple cores, though Intel leads in gaming specifically, while AMD matches Intel well for multi-core tasks.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next