Updated version with 3080
Updated version with 3080
Hello, you're thinking about your first PC build in a few years and are considering a used 3080. You're weighing between a 13600K with DDR4 and a R5 7600 with DDR5, both at 32GB. In New Zealand, these options are roughly similar in price, with the 7600 being about $25 cheaper. You mentioned the 13600K edges ahead of the 7600 in performance, but you're curious if it's worth skipping DDR5 and the AM5 upgrade path. The 7700 is another choice, but it's around $125 more than the 13600K here, though your budget allows some flexibility. You'd likely see solid gains from the 13600K over the 7600, especially at this price point, and you might have enough time to enjoy its benefits before needing an upgrade. Let me know if you need more details!
The 13600K offers roughly a 15% boost in gaming performance on average, but the precise gain varies based on how CPU-intensive the game is. For titles like Civ VI, you’d likely see close to that percentage. With games such as Doom Eternal, the difference would be minimal. The advantage comes more from multicore tasks than raw single-core speed. Expect solid results for a while, though future CPUs and game demands make long-term predictions uncertain. Performance will shift quickly as processors advance, so current expectations are just an estimate. Both sides have valid points, but I tend to favor the 13600K due to practical upgrade considerations.