F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Ubuntu Unity is no longer in use. We plan to revert to GNOME by 2018.

Ubuntu Unity is no longer in use. We plan to revert to GNOME by 2018.

Ubuntu Unity is no longer in use. We plan to revert to GNOME by 2018.

T
tomtiger99
Member
111
03-20-2016, 05:58 AM
#1
After years of developing their own version of the gnome shell, Canonical has officially retired Unity. They mentioned issues with fragmentation and lack of progress on merging phone and tablet experiences, so they’re returning to GNOME. The last time Ubuntu used GNOME as its default was in 2010. I personally enjoyed using Ubuntu back then—my first install was 8.04 in 2008—but eventually moved to other Linux distros after Unity became the standard and their priorities shifted. It looks like they’re now aiming to bring more unity to the Linux world again. Honestly, I’m really excited about this move!
T
tomtiger99
03-20-2016, 05:58 AM #1

After years of developing their own version of the gnome shell, Canonical has officially retired Unity. They mentioned issues with fragmentation and lack of progress on merging phone and tablet experiences, so they’re returning to GNOME. The last time Ubuntu used GNOME as its default was in 2010. I personally enjoyed using Ubuntu back then—my first install was 8.04 in 2008—but eventually moved to other Linux distros after Unity became the standard and their priorities shifted. It looks like they’re now aiming to bring more unity to the Linux world again. Honestly, I’m really excited about this move!

K
KimmyD93
Junior Member
23
03-20-2016, 05:48 PM
#2
Lubuntu isn't really a new take on Ubuntu—it's just another name for the same lightweight version. Don’t worry, you’re not completely lost; it’s still Linux, but with a different branding.
K
KimmyD93
03-20-2016, 05:48 PM #2

Lubuntu isn't really a new take on Ubuntu—it's just another name for the same lightweight version. Don’t worry, you’re not completely lost; it’s still Linux, but with a different branding.

H
Hyper_B0Y
Member
215
03-28-2016, 01:02 AM
#3
Gnome remains demanding in terms of resources while LXDE stays straightforward. For those moving from Windows to Ubuntu refugees, Lubuntu may transition to LXQt, though not using 17.04.
H
Hyper_B0Y
03-28-2016, 01:02 AM #3

Gnome remains demanding in terms of resources while LXDE stays straightforward. For those moving from Windows to Ubuntu refugees, Lubuntu may transition to LXQt, though not using 17.04.

K
Kaden4y
Member
191
03-28-2016, 02:36 AM
#4
Lubuntu gained official status within the Ubuntu lineage in May 2011, following version 11.04, operating under LXDE instead of Unity and GNOME. Earlier, in October 2008, LXDE became available for Ubuntu starting with 8.10, though between 8.10 and 9.10 users still needed to install it after Ubuntu replaced GNOME.
K
Kaden4y
03-28-2016, 02:36 AM #4

Lubuntu gained official status within the Ubuntu lineage in May 2011, following version 11.04, operating under LXDE instead of Unity and GNOME. Earlier, in October 2008, LXDE became available for Ubuntu starting with 8.10, though between 8.10 and 9.10 users still needed to install it after Ubuntu replaced GNOME.

Z
zeroxpalace
Member
116
03-28-2016, 05:50 AM
#5
Suggesting a switch from one environment to another in such a broken system doesn’t really make sense...
Z
zeroxpalace
03-28-2016, 05:50 AM #5

Suggesting a switch from one environment to another in such a broken system doesn’t really make sense...

W
WinterBoom
Junior Member
11
04-04-2016, 05:21 PM
#6
They are releasing a shell they crafted (Unity) and reverting to the previous setup (GNOME) for building it...
W
WinterBoom
04-04-2016, 05:21 PM #6

They are releasing a shell they crafted (Unity) and reverting to the previous setup (GNOME) for building it...

I
ItzKanekii
Junior Member
34
04-04-2016, 06:47 PM
#7
GNOME leads in development compared to Unity because it's widely adopted in other distributions like Debian and Fedora. Instead of creating separate projects, they aim to support the broader Linux community. This approach isn't flawless, but I appreciate it. The emphasis on GNOME should foster better collaboration among developers over time.
I
ItzKanekii
04-04-2016, 06:47 PM #7

GNOME leads in development compared to Unity because it's widely adopted in other distributions like Debian and Fedora. Instead of creating separate projects, they aim to support the broader Linux community. This approach isn't flawless, but I appreciate it. The emphasis on GNOME should foster better collaboration among developers over time.

A
Aragone
Member
224
04-04-2016, 07:24 PM
#8
That means they saved money by removing an unwanted feature that users disliked, returning to a more functional approach. It wasn't a strong step toward making the Linux desktop platform more consistent.
A
Aragone
04-04-2016, 07:24 PM #8

That means they saved money by removing an unwanted feature that users disliked, returning to a more functional approach. It wasn't a strong step toward making the Linux desktop platform more consistent.

D
Darkbandit92
Posting Freak
839
04-20-2016, 10:40 AM
#9
I found Unity GNOME to be acceptable but preferred Unity itself. It seems unlikely I’d want to stick with Ubuntu after 18.04, even though I don’t use it now. It’s nice that there are other choices, though they all use GNOME. I’ve experimented with Cinnamon in Debian before, which was fine. Anyway, I enjoyed Unity and found it a solid desktop experience.
D
Darkbandit92
04-20-2016, 10:40 AM #9

I found Unity GNOME to be acceptable but preferred Unity itself. It seems unlikely I’d want to stick with Ubuntu after 18.04, even though I don’t use it now. It’s nice that there are other choices, though they all use GNOME. I’ve experimented with Cinnamon in Debian before, which was fine. Anyway, I enjoyed Unity and found it a solid desktop experience.

X
xPumma
Member
186
04-21-2016, 11:36 PM
#10
Some found it enjoyable, others found it slightly more complicated. GNOME represents a balanced mix of different desktop environments. It’s not bad overall. For newcomers, it might feel a bit tougher due to its unique setup. I favor Unity over GNOME, though neither is flawless. Ubuntu and Unity pair well together; technically you can install Unity on most systems, but Ubuntu remains the primary platform where Unity was originally developed by the same team. What sets Ubuntu apart is its package management and standardization. Still, I’m not entirely convinced by the shift. The main issue for many Linux enthusiasts who stick closely to it is their perception of rigidity.
X
xPumma
04-21-2016, 11:36 PM #10

Some found it enjoyable, others found it slightly more complicated. GNOME represents a balanced mix of different desktop environments. It’s not bad overall. For newcomers, it might feel a bit tougher due to its unique setup. I favor Unity over GNOME, though neither is flawless. Ubuntu and Unity pair well together; technically you can install Unity on most systems, but Ubuntu remains the primary platform where Unity was originally developed by the same team. What sets Ubuntu apart is its package management and standardization. Still, I’m not entirely convinced by the shift. The main issue for many Linux enthusiasts who stick closely to it is their perception of rigidity.