Ubisoft asserts that including female assassins is financially excessive.
Ubisoft asserts that including female assassins is financially excessive.
Consider this perspective: Does the sheer number of people—6 billion—make your existence irrelevant? In the grand scheme, you’re probably just another face in the crowd, could be hit by a bus tomorrow and nobody would care. Yet you’d still matter, wouldn’t you? When it comes to conflict, politics, or employment, maybe those things seem less significant compared to others, but they don’t erase your value. The same applies to entertainment—movies, books, music, games—if they’re not the biggest players, it doesn’t diminish their worth. Saying issues aren’t important is unfair and shows a limited way of thinking.
Just focus on the present, okay? Don't worry about what's to come.
I understand, though another point was overlooked. People often suggest adding female characters and noting that male players opting for female roles may be expressing homosexual fantasies. This argument has been raised against games such as WoW, and it clearly isn't a favorable outcome.
Basically, aside from that super thin justification, if they don’t want female sins, you won’t get them. They can shape their game however they like. Yes, it’s just a game with an incredibly made-up story. There’s nothing in the laws of the universe that requires female characters to exist.