F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Tri channel ram config

Tri channel ram config

Tri channel ram config

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
X
xanderzone317
Posting Freak
957
06-10-2016, 02:08 AM
#11
Running at high core speeds to prevent instability is a common approach. After completing the imc, you can install a Samsung Rev D 2Gbit for extra performance without increasing the clock speed. In India, W series XEons generally offer better binning compared to X series XEons.
X
xanderzone317
06-10-2016, 02:08 AM #11

Running at high core speeds to prevent instability is a common approach. After completing the imc, you can install a Samsung Rev D 2Gbit for extra performance without increasing the clock speed. In India, W series XEons generally offer better binning compared to X series XEons.

H
Hecchicero
Member
171
06-11-2016, 03:22 PM
#12
I’m not sure... for me it looks like a better CPU mainly due to the dividers. X series aren’t bad, but tighter spacing is better since you can’t handle very fast sticks.
H
Hecchicero
06-11-2016, 03:22 PM #12

I’m not sure... for me it looks like a better CPU mainly due to the dividers. X series aren’t bad, but tighter spacing is better since you can’t handle very fast sticks.

D
donner_2
Member
60
06-17-2016, 08:26 AM
#13
The w series offer improved IMC? Could higher voltage levels assist? I’m open to reaching up to 1.55V daily if required.
D
donner_2
06-17-2016, 08:26 AM #13

The w series offer improved IMC? Could higher voltage levels assist? I’m open to reaching up to 1.55V daily if required.

E
ESplatinum
Junior Member
13
06-19-2016, 12:05 AM
#14
My X5690 managed over 200 bclk, which is impressive. You can find dividers similar to those in Gulftown, which I find interesting since I have a good memory for it. Most users prefer X series models. I was drawn to them because they offered high core speeds, but I also felt stuck due to limitations. Before the X5690 ES, I had a 970, and experimenting with it was more enjoyable even if I didn’t reach the same top speeds.
E
ESplatinum
06-19-2016, 12:05 AM #14

My X5690 managed over 200 bclk, which is impressive. You can find dividers similar to those in Gulftown, which I find interesting since I have a good memory for it. Most users prefer X series models. I was drawn to them because they offered high core speeds, but I also felt stuck due to limitations. Before the X5690 ES, I had a 970, and experimenting with it was more enjoyable even if I didn’t reach the same top speeds.

J
juaminolo
Junior Member
28
06-19-2016, 12:54 AM
#15
DDR3 might work better with a higher voltage of 2.1v. Make sure the cooling is solid. The PWM frequency isn’t helping much, so focusing on stability is key. You’re aiming for maximum performance from the core.
J
juaminolo
06-19-2016, 12:54 AM #15

DDR3 might work better with a higher voltage of 2.1v. Make sure the cooling is solid. The PWM frequency isn’t helping much, so focusing on stability is key. You’re aiming for maximum performance from the core.

S
sniperboy650
Senior Member
735
06-25-2016, 09:24 PM
#16
Running above 1.5V causes issues due to overheating, so I can't safely hit 4.4g on the CPU without risking damage. With spare 120mm fans, 2.1V is the safe limit for DDR3. The exact voltage at which it starts to fail isn’t clear from here.
S
sniperboy650
06-25-2016, 09:24 PM #16

Running above 1.5V causes issues due to overheating, so I can't safely hit 4.4g on the CPU without risking damage. With spare 120mm fans, 2.1V is the safe limit for DDR3. The exact voltage at which it starts to fail isn’t clear from here.

A
ariel_8888
Member
214
06-27-2016, 01:29 AM
#17
Likely to start degrading around 2.1v. That was the target I was aiming for. The CPU is important. Memory controllers are selective, especially with F. My 980X doesn’t handle high-frequency 2200mhz unless I run cas 10, which pushes the uncore up to 4000mhz—this chip reaches 4300mhz. Cas 6 at 2000mhz is the sweet spot. I’m not near a rig, but boost PCH and PLL voltages. I don’t have precise figures right now. Need more coffee.
A
ariel_8888
06-27-2016, 01:29 AM #17

Likely to start degrading around 2.1v. That was the target I was aiming for. The CPU is important. Memory controllers are selective, especially with F. My 980X doesn’t handle high-frequency 2200mhz unless I run cas 10, which pushes the uncore up to 4000mhz—this chip reaches 4300mhz. Cas 6 at 2000mhz is the sweet spot. I’m not near a rig, but boost PCH and PLL voltages. I don’t have precise figures right now. Need more coffee.

N
nickydebreker
Junior Member
43
07-18-2016, 11:58 PM
#18
Great job! I appreciate your patience. It's been quite some time since I used it, so I can give you a more detailed update if needed.
N
nickydebreker
07-18-2016, 11:58 PM #18

Great job! I appreciate your patience. It's been quite some time since I used it, so I can give you a more detailed update if needed.

M
mr_creeper72
Junior Member
5
07-20-2016, 01:11 PM
#19
Your BCLK setting is acceptable for your clocking, but you may want to adjust it slightly for RAM performance. Most users stick around 1.9V, though the extra benefit isn't always clear.
M
mr_creeper72
07-20-2016, 01:11 PM #19

Your BCLK setting is acceptable for your clocking, but you may want to adjust it slightly for RAM performance. Most users stick around 1.9V, though the extra benefit isn't always clear.

F
Flack
Junior Member
38
07-23-2016, 12:14 AM
#20
Difficult to put into words. My 980 vs 980x are vastly different overclockers, even though they're similar chips. My 920 and 930 perform significantly worse. I haven't worked much with Xeon; there are many memory dividers missing, so you need a perfect 1:1 core-to-core setup for stability.
F
Flack
07-23-2016, 12:14 AM #20

Difficult to put into words. My 980 vs 980x are vastly different overclockers, even though they're similar chips. My 920 and 930 perform significantly worse. I haven't worked much with Xeon; there are many memory dividers missing, so you need a perfect 1:1 core-to-core setup for stability.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next