Top socket S1 processor.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next

Awibo
Junior Member

11-27-2016, 05:03 AM

I need a compatible S1 CPU for your laptop. For an Athlon 64 TF-20 with 1.6 GHz, look for a high-performance S1 model that supports the required socket and voltage. Recommend checking recent reviews or contacting a tech store for the best options. Thanks!

Awibo

11-27-2016, 05:03 AM #1

shadymod
Junior Member

11-27-2016, 05:51 AM

The quickest mobile chip for socket S1 is the TF-38 at 2.2ghz with 31 watts. The TF-20 uses just 15 watts. Your heat production will more than double.

shadymod

11-27-2016, 05:51 AM #2

The quickest mobile chip for socket S1 is the TF-38 at 2.2ghz with 31 watts. The TF-20 uses just 15 watts. Your heat production will more than double.

Gn0meChild
Member

121

11-29-2016, 07:18 AM

Cost-effective cooling solution!

Gn0meChild

11-29-2016, 07:18 AM #3

Cost-effective cooling solution!

Sh4rKai
Member

11-30-2016, 09:58 AM

Well we could go bigger like a dual core, The TL-68. That's 35w, but realistically closer to 45w under load. Your board supporting it?? No idea. 50% chance.

Sh4rKai

11-30-2016, 09:58 AM #4

Well we could go bigger like a dual core, The TL-68. That's 35w, but realistically closer to 45w under load. Your board supporting it?? No idea. 50% chance.

TuhOwl
Junior Member

11-30-2016, 10:35 AM

Socket S1 presents a challenging situation... typical of AMD design. It has been used across many CPU generations. The top-performing models that physically fit it are the AMD Phenom II X4 X940, a quad-core 2.4 GHz processor delivering 45 watts. However, it's unlikely any other CPU will match its performance while also fitting the same socket revision (S1g1), memory type, and TDP. Still, it appears no single-core Athlon chip outperforms it in this setup. RIP VRM's

TuhOwl

11-30-2016, 10:35 AM #5

derk4321
Senior Member

482

12-03-2016, 04:17 AM

I think these devices are likely Turion 64 models, though I should verify. I’d need to confirm the details before sharing.

derk4321

12-03-2016, 04:17 AM #6

I think these devices are likely Turion 64 models, though I should verify. I’d need to confirm the details before sharing.

Waverabbit
Senior Member

643

12-08-2016, 04:11 AM

I'm connecting right now with a Socket 754 mobile unit. It was designed for the 90nm chips, the older generation. This one is a Turion 64 ML-30.

Waverabbit

12-08-2016, 04:11 AM #7

I'm connecting right now with a Socket 754 mobile unit. It was designed for the 90nm chips, the older generation. This one is a Turion 64 ML-30.

CatsGoMeow123
Member

158

12-15-2016, 09:38 PM

Right, the bad part is I've run myself all these damn platforms also. Not really for daily, but for overclocking. I did find a validation actually I can link here. https://valid.x86.fr/tzhjav I sadly have no socket 754 hardware. Have OCed it plenty though. Even one of the fast chips

CatsGoMeow123

12-15-2016, 09:38 PM #8

iMegaan
Member

162

12-17-2016, 07:26 AM

My setup, I’ve upgraded it myself. Now I don’t have the CPU anymore. (ML-30)

iMegaan

12-17-2016, 07:26 AM #9

My setup, I’ve upgraded it myself. Now I don’t have the CPU anymore. (ML-30)

PhoenixCookie
Member

12-18-2016, 11:05 PM

#10

Wow, that would really drop the charger's power output by itself. The GPU and system are struggling to maintain performance.

PhoenixCookie

12-18-2016, 11:05 PM #10

Wow, that would really drop the charger's power output by itself. The GPU and system are struggling to maintain performance.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next