F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Top router for 10G internet offers high-speed connectivity and robust performance.

Top router for 10G internet offers high-speed connectivity and robust performance.

Top router for 10G internet offers high-speed connectivity and robust performance.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3
B
blueyonder3
Junior Member
12
03-21-2016, 09:12 AM
#21
You don't require Cat7 cable; Cat6 works well up to 55 meters and Cat6a extends to 100 meters. For distances under 30 meters (I suggest 10-15 meters at most), RJ45 - SFP+ transceivers are suitable, converting a standard 10g RJ45 into SFP+... they cost between $10 and $30 each. Apart from this, I don’t have any information about the best router for your needs.
B
blueyonder3
03-21-2016, 09:12 AM #21

You don't require Cat7 cable; Cat6 works well up to 55 meters and Cat6a extends to 100 meters. For distances under 30 meters (I suggest 10-15 meters at most), RJ45 - SFP+ transceivers are suitable, converting a standard 10g RJ45 into SFP+... they cost between $10 and $30 each. Apart from this, I don’t have any information about the best router for your needs.

G
GewoonJob_
Member
53
03-21-2016, 11:11 AM
#22
To fully leverage your 10G connection, I'm considering VyOS or TNSR with fast-current x86 hardware. My focus is on solutions based around Xeon processors. I'll use Intel NICs from the X540 series and a PHY layer that fits your requirements—SFP+ would be the most convenient option.
G
GewoonJob_
03-21-2016, 11:11 AM #22

To fully leverage your 10G connection, I'm considering VyOS or TNSR with fast-current x86 hardware. My focus is on solutions based around Xeon processors. I'll use Intel NICs from the X540 series and a PHY layer that fits your requirements—SFP+ would be the most convenient option.

S
112
03-21-2016, 07:43 PM
#23
We don't require "fast-current, x86 hardware" for 10G speeds at the router level. It's not essential to invest heavily in a new CPU. My personal setup uses an Intel Core i7 4790 and manages four 10G interfaces just fine. The main focus is ensuring sufficient PCI-E bandwidth. A dual-port 10G NIC needs an x8 slot, which is generally manageable on systems with an integrated graphics card.
S
superdavideito
03-21-2016, 07:43 PM #23

We don't require "fast-current, x86 hardware" for 10G speeds at the router level. It's not essential to invest heavily in a new CPU. My personal setup uses an Intel Core i7 4790 and manages four 10G interfaces just fine. The main focus is ensuring sufficient PCI-E bandwidth. A dual-port 10G NIC needs an x8 slot, which is generally manageable on systems with an integrated graphics card.

C
camh08
Junior Member
16
03-22-2016, 04:55 AM
#24
I understand it doesn't quite meet the Ethernet specs, but the Ubiquiti Dream Machine Pro looks promising. It includes SPF+ WAN and LAN ports plus an 8-port gigabit switch. It's reasonably priced, though I can't confirm the exact region. Pair it with a 10G Ethernet switch that has at least one SFP+ port—what you found is a solid choice, likely cheaper than similar models. Cat7 offers higher bandwidth than Cat6a, but real-world performance depends on EMI. Cat5e might handle 10G in theory, but interference over long distances can limit it. I’ve faced this issue with longer runs and switched to multimode fiber. In short, Cat6a works well for short distances.
C
camh08
03-22-2016, 04:55 AM #24

I understand it doesn't quite meet the Ethernet specs, but the Ubiquiti Dream Machine Pro looks promising. It includes SPF+ WAN and LAN ports plus an 8-port gigabit switch. It's reasonably priced, though I can't confirm the exact region. Pair it with a 10G Ethernet switch that has at least one SFP+ port—what you found is a solid choice, likely cheaper than similar models. Cat7 offers higher bandwidth than Cat6a, but real-world performance depends on EMI. Cat5e might handle 10G in theory, but interference over long distances can limit it. I’ve faced this issue with longer runs and switched to multimode fiber. In short, Cat6a works well for short distances.

L
luukieluke21
Member
180
03-22-2016, 05:34 AM
#25
Create a tailored TNSR setup now – available free for personal or non-commercial projects. This initiative by the pfSense team complements the main project, employing VPP and DPDK to optimize traffic handling and reduce CPU load. These Linux-based improvements boost packet processing per core from about 1Gb/s to up to 10Gb/s. https://www.tnsr.com/ https://www.tnsr.com/tnsr-vs-pfsense-software Achieving 10G is straightforward; I’d likely use Intel 10G, Mellanox Connect-X or SolarFlare cards. These are affordable options and I’m currently using a SolarFlare SFN5121 in my colo/test chassis running TNSR. No graphical interface, but it offers REST API and console access, making setup for regular internet use simple and potentially educational.
L
luukieluke21
03-22-2016, 05:34 AM #25

Create a tailored TNSR setup now – available free for personal or non-commercial projects. This initiative by the pfSense team complements the main project, employing VPP and DPDK to optimize traffic handling and reduce CPU load. These Linux-based improvements boost packet processing per core from about 1Gb/s to up to 10Gb/s. https://www.tnsr.com/ https://www.tnsr.com/tnsr-vs-pfsense-software Achieving 10G is straightforward; I’d likely use Intel 10G, Mellanox Connect-X or SolarFlare cards. These are affordable options and I’m currently using a SolarFlare SFN5121 in my colo/test chassis running TNSR. No graphical interface, but it offers REST API and console access, making setup for regular internet use simple and potentially educational.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3